2024-04-25 09:16:36

by Nikolaos Pasaloukos

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v3 2/5] dt-bindings: arm: blaize: Add Blaize BLZP1600 SoC

Add device tree bindings for the Blaize BLZP1600 CB2
development board (carrier board), which uses the
BLZP1600 SoM.

Reviewed-by: James Cowgill <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Matt Redfearn <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Neil Jones <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Nikolaos Pasaloukos <[email protected]>
---
.../devicetree/bindings/arm/blaize.yaml | 40 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 40 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/blaize.yaml

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/blaize.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/blaize.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..8034aeb7a2b4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/blaize.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/arm/blaize.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: Blaize Platforms
+
+maintainers:
+ - James Cowgill <[email protected]>
+ - Matt Redfearn <[email protected]>
+ - Neil Jones <[email protected]>
+ - Nikolaos Pasaloukos <[email protected]>
+
+description: |
+ Blaize Platforms using SoCs designed by Blaize Inc.
+
+ The products currently based on the BLZP1600 SoC:
+
+ - BLZP1600-SoM: SoM module
+ - BLZP1600-CB2: Development board CB2 based on BLZP1600-SoM
+
+ The compatible property should follow the format:
+
+ compatible = "blaize,blzp1600-cb2", "blaize,blzp1600";
+
+properties:
+ $nodename:
+ const: '/'
+ compatible:
+ oneOf:
+ - description: Blaize BLZP1600 based boards
+ items:
+ - enum:
+ - blaize,blzp1600-cb2
+ - const: blaize,blzp1600
+
+additionalProperties: true
+
+...
--
2.34.1



2024-04-25 09:17:51

by Krzysztof Kozlowski

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] dt-bindings: arm: blaize: Add Blaize BLZP1600 SoC

On 25/04/2024 11:15, Niko Pasaloukos wrote:
> Add device tree bindings for the Blaize BLZP1600 CB2
> development board (carrier board), which uses the
> BLZP1600 SoM.
>
> Reviewed-by: James Cowgill <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Matt Redfearn <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Neil Jones <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Nikolaos Pasaloukos <[email protected]>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/blaize.yaml | 40 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/blaize.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/blaize.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/blaize.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..8034aeb7a2b4
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/blaize.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/arm/blaize.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Blaize Platforms
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - James Cowgill <[email protected]>
> + - Matt Redfearn <[email protected]>
> + - Neil Jones <[email protected]>
> + - Nikolaos Pasaloukos <[email protected]>
> +
> +description: |
> + Blaize Platforms using SoCs designed by Blaize Inc.
> +
> + The products currently based on the BLZP1600 SoC:
> +
> + - BLZP1600-SoM: SoM module
> + - BLZP1600-CB2: Development board CB2 based on BLZP1600-SoM
> +
> + The compatible property should follow the format:
> +
> + compatible = "blaize,blzp1600-cb2", "blaize,blzp1600";

This is a friendly reminder during the review process.

It seems my or other reviewer's previous comments were not fully
addressed. Maybe the feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you
just forgot to apply it. Please go back to the previous discussion and
either implement all requested changes or keep discussing them.

Thank you.

Best regards,
Krzysztof


2024-04-25 09:41:03

by Nikolaos Pasaloukos

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] dt-bindings: arm: blaize: Add Blaize BLZP1600 SoC

On 25/04/2024 10:16, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 25/04/2024 11:15, Niko Pasaloukos wrote:
>> Add device tree bindings for the Blaize BLZP1600 CB2
>> development board (carrier board), which uses the
>> BLZP1600 SoM.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: James Cowgill <[email protected]>
>> Reviewed-by: Matt Redfearn <[email protected]>
>> Reviewed-by: Neil Jones <[email protected]>
>> Signed-off-by: Nikolaos Pasaloukos <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> .../devicetree/bindings/arm/blaize.yaml | 40 +++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/blaize.yaml
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/blaize.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/blaize.yaml
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..8034aeb7a2b4
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/blaize.yaml
>> @@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
>> +%YAML 1.2
>> +---
>> +$id: https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://devicetree.org/schemas/arm/blaize.yaml*__;Iw!!FddXBOku!i6XKbnL3gXmoklJKfuksrfCB61MTEFuw8JiIVn9sS0CzEmHpqDhXguC5Me3sUQt1gw4RxA4mo8TAHR8psxBV0Dmrs0veWKlRgo18$
>> +$schema: https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml*__;Iw!!FddXBOku!i6XKbnL3gXmoklJKfuksrfCB61MTEFuw8JiIVn9sS0CzEmHpqDhXguC5Me3sUQt1gw4RxA4mo8TAHR8psxBV0Dmrs0veWEVjMhqf$
>> +
>> +title: Blaize Platforms
>> +
>> +maintainers:
>> + - James Cowgill <[email protected]>
>> + - Matt Redfearn <[email protected]>
>> + - Neil Jones <[email protected]>
>> + - Nikolaos Pasaloukos <[email protected]>
>> +
>> +description: |
>> + Blaize Platforms using SoCs designed by Blaize Inc.
>> +
>> + The products currently based on the BLZP1600 SoC:
>> +
>> + - BLZP1600-SoM: SoM module
>> + - BLZP1600-CB2: Development board CB2 based on BLZP1600-SoM
>> +
>> + The compatible property should follow the format:
>> +
>> + compatible = "blaize,blzp1600-cb2", "blaize,blzp1600";
>
> This is a friendly reminder during the review process.
>
> It seems my or other reviewer's previous comments were not fully
> addressed. Maybe the feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you
> just forgot to apply it. Please go back to the previous discussion and
> either implement all requested changes or keep discussing them.
>
> Thank you.
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>

Apologies, you are right. Now with the threading fixed, I'll be able to gather all the feedback properly.
I'll fix this on V4.

Best regards,
Niko