This probably is not the right lpace, but can't think of where else to ask
Has anyone implemented a /proc device or user program to interrogate the
enviromental attirbutes (temp, voltage etc) that many motherboards provide
via their bios's ?
Please point me in the right direction
Andrew
[Andrew Stubbs]
> Has anyone implemented a /proc device or user program to interrogate
> the enviromental attirbutes (temp, voltage etc) that many
> motherboards provide via their bios's ?
Do a search on 'lm_sensors'.
Peter
Hit http://www.lm-sensors.nu/
Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> Has anyone implemented a /proc device or user program to interrogate the
> enviromental attirbutes (temp, voltage etc) that many motherboards provide
> via their bios's ?
>
> Please point me in the right direction
--
=====================================================================
Mohammad A. Haque http://www.haque.net/
[email protected]
"Alcohol and calculus don't mix. Project Lead
Don't drink and derive." --Unknown http://wm.themes.org/
[email protected]
=====================================================================
Peter Samuelson <[email protected]> writes:
> [Andrew Stubbs]
> > Has anyone implemented a /proc device or user program to interrogate
> > the enviromental attirbutes (temp, voltage etc) that many
> > motherboards provide via their bios's ?
>
> Do a search on 'lm_sensors'.
Does this work with the latest 2.4.0-testxx kernels. It stopped
working for me quite a few kernel tests ago.
> Peter Samuelson <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > [Andrew Stubbs]
> > > Has anyone implemented a /proc device or user program to interrogate
> > > the enviromental attirbutes (temp, voltage etc) that many
> > > motherboards provide via their bios's ?
> >
> > Do a search on 'lm_sensors'.
>
> Does this work with the latest 2.4.0-testxx kernels. It stopped
> working for me quite a few kernel tests ago.
lm_sensors 2.4.5 work fine for my abit bp6
cannot succed to use 2.5.x serie
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
Hello,
I have a patch for lm_sensors to match changes in 2.4.0-testxx. It is
available at:
http://www.lostland.net/~jimbud/patches/lm_sensors-2.5.2-2.4.x.patch.gz
Regards,
Adrian
On 10 Dec 2000, Graham Murray wrote:
> Peter Samuelson <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > [Andrew Stubbs]
> > > Has anyone implemented a /proc device or user program to interrogate
> > > the enviromental attirbutes (temp, voltage etc) that many
> > > motherboards provide via their bios's ?
> >
> > Do a search on 'lm_sensors'.
>
> Does this work with the latest 2.4.0-testxx kernels. It stopped
> working for me quite a few kernel tests ago.
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
"Mohammad A. Haque" wrote:
> Hit http://www.lm-sensors.nu/
does anyone have an IP address for cvs.lm-sensors.nu?
-d
In article <[email protected]>,
Graham Murray <[email protected]> writes:
GM> Peter Samuelson <[email protected]> writes:
GM>
>> [Andrew Stubbs]
>> > Has anyone implemented a /proc device or user program to interrogate
>> > the enviromental attirbutes (temp, voltage etc) that many
>> > motherboards provide via their bios's ?
>>
>> Do a search on 'lm_sensors'.
GM>
GM> Does this work with the latest 2.4.0-testxx kernels. It stopped
GM> working for me quite a few kernel tests ago.
lm_sensors-2.5.4 is working fine here with 2.4.0t12p7 here (MSI mobo, VIA
stuff).
Try this patch against the 2.5.x series. I submitted it to them back
when it broke with test8 but never checked if it made it in.
philippe wrote:
>
> lm_sensors 2.4.5 work fine for my abit bp6
> cannot succed to use 2.5.x serie
--
=====================================================================
Mohammad A. Haque http://www.haque.net/
[email protected]
"Alcohol and calculus don't mix. Project Lead
Don't drink and derive." --Unknown http://wm.themes.org/
[email protected]
=====================================================================
On Sun, Dec 10, 2000 at 04:55:02PM -0000, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> This probably is not the right lpace, but can't think of where else to ask
>
> Has anyone implemented a /proc device or user program to interrogate the
> enviromental attirbutes (temp, voltage etc) that many motherboards provide
> via their bios's ?
>
> Please point me in the right direction
<points at freshmeat.net>
lmsensors
Looks like their dns server is borked. I can't even get to their site.
David Ford wrote:
>
> "Mohammad A. Haque" wrote:
>
> > Hit http://www.lm-sensors.nu/
>
> does anyone have an IP address for cvs.lm-sensors.nu?
>
> -d
--
=====================================================================
Mohammad A. Haque http://www.haque.net/
[email protected]
"Alcohol and calculus don't mix. Project Lead
Don't drink and derive." --Unknown http://wm.themes.org/
[email protected]
=====================================================================
On Sun, 10 Dec 2000, Mohammad A. Haque wrote:
> Hit http://www.lm-sensors.nu/
do these guys /ever/ plan on submitting kernel patches? i used to use
lm_sensors on 2.2 cause it was fairly painless - but just havn't
bothered with 2.4 cause it was a pita when i tried.
i know they talked AC at some point about getting a patch in, but
nothing seems to have come from it.
what a damm damm shame. we've got code that appears to work really
well[1] to drive most of the hardware sensors out there - but the
code is used by only a tiny fraction of linux users cause these guys
/apparently/ would much rather keep themselves and their code
isolated in some god forsaken CVS server rather than submit their
code to Linus.
fscking shame.
--
Paul Jakma [email protected] [email protected]
PGP5 key: http://www.clubi.ie/jakma/publickey.txt
-------------------------------------------
Fortune:
Ten persons who speak make more noise than ten thousand who are silent.
-- Napoleon I
[1]. i only had very slight problems with module ref counts earlier
in its devel cycle.
> do these guys /ever/ plan on submitting kernel patches? i used to use
> lm_sensors on 2.2 cause it was fairly painless - but just havn't
> bothered with 2.4 cause it was a pita when i tried.
Its in 2.4 it wont be in 2.2 I suspect
It's in 2.4? Where?
Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > do these guys /ever/ plan on submitting kernel patches? i used to use
> > lm_sensors on 2.2 cause it was fairly painless - but just havn't
> > bothered with 2.4 cause it was a pita when i tried.
>
> Its in 2.4 it wont be in 2.2 I suspect
--
=====================================================================
Mohammad A. Haque http://www.haque.net/
[email protected]
"Alcohol and calculus don't mix. Project Lead
Don't drink and derive." --Unknown http://wm.themes.org/
[email protected]
=====================================================================
On Tue, 12 Dec 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
> Its in 2.4 it wont be in 2.2 I suspect
it is? i don't see the sensors stuff, so you must mean just the i2c
bits. Any word on whether we'll see sensors code go in to 2.4?
like i said, their code has worked well for me, but they seem intent
on keeping it as obscure as possible... (i remember someone posted to
l-k that they'd started a sensors project, and had code for the LM80.
he wasn't at all aware of lm_sensors!).
regards,
--
Paul Jakma [email protected] [email protected]
PGP5 key: http://www.clubi.ie/jakma/publickey.txt
-------------------------------------------
Fortune:
Some programming languages manage to absorb change, but withstand progress.
-- Epigrams in Programming, ACM SIGPLAN Sept. 1982
> it is? i don't see the sensors stuff, so you must mean just the i2c
> bits. Any word on whether we'll see sensors code go in to 2.4?
The i2c bits
> like i said, their code has worked well for me, but they seem intent
> on keeping it as obscure as possible... (i remember someone posted to
No idea on the sensors stuff
On Tue, 12 Dec 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > like i said, their code has worked well for me, but they seem intent
> > on keeping it as obscure as possible... (i remember someone posted to
> No idea on the sensors stuff
Whats keeping lm78 from being integrated into 2.4?
-Dan
On Tue, 12 Dec 2000, Alan Cox wrote:
> No idea on the sensors stuff
i'll go nag them again. :)
regards,
--
Paul Jakma [email protected] [email protected]
PGP5 key: http://www.clubi.ie/jakma/publickey.txt
-------------------------------------------
Fortune:
You will lose an important disk file.