Dan Kegel <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>How close is TCP_NOPUSH to behaving identically to TCP_CORK now?
They are exactly the same.
>If it does behave identically, it might be time to standardize
>the symbolic name for this option, to make apps more portable
>between the two OS's. (It'd be nice to also standardize the
>numeric value, in the interest of making the ABI's more compatible, too.)
I wonder if it's a bit late for that now...
This reminds me to make sure that FreeBSD's Linux emulation supports
TCP_CORK properly.
Tony.
--
f.a.n.finch [email protected] [email protected]
" ``Well, let's go down and find out who's grave it is.''
``How?'' ``By going down and finding out!'' "