Hi Pavel.
This diff should be OK (I hope)
--
Ducrot Bruno
http://www.poupinou.org Page profaissionelle
http://toto.tu-me-saoules.com Haume page
Hi!
> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@
> cmpl _0x12345678, %eax
> jne bogus_real_magic
>
> -#if 1
> +#if 0
> lcall _0xc000,_3
> #endif
> #if 0
We should make this runtime configurable...
Anyway disabling this is probably right.
> @@ -69,8 +69,12 @@
>
> movl real_save_cr0 - wakeup_code, %eax
> movl %eax, %cr0
> +
> + # flush the prefetch queue.
> jmp 1f
> +1: jmp 1f
> 1:
Is this really neccessary? One jump should be
ok...
> @@ -160,11 +164,12 @@
> ALIGN
>
>
> -.org 0x2000
> +.org 0x800
> wakeup_stack:
> -.org 0x3000
> +.org 0x900
> ENTRY(wakeup_end)
> -.org 0x4000
> +# .org 0x1000
> + .align 4096
Kill the comment, otherwise ok.
> wakeup_pmode_return:
> movl ___KERNEL_DS, %eax
--
Pavel
Written on sharp zaurus, because my Velo1 broke. If you have Velo you don't need...
It seems you have been trying to correct the acpi_wakeup code (back at 17
Dec). Has that been merged to Linus' tree?
I got 2.5.58 today, acpi_wakeup.S is still dated 16 Dec and that patch
regarding the location of the wakeup asm code (see the '2.5.51: sleep
broken') has not reached me through Linus' patches.
On Tue, Jan 14, 2003 at 07:56:23PM +0200, P. Christeas wrote:
> It seems you have been trying to correct the acpi_wakeup code (back at 17
> Dec). Has that been merged to Linus' tree?
>
> I got 2.5.58 today, acpi_wakeup.S is still dated 16 Dec and that patch
> regarding the location of the wakeup asm code (see the '2.5.51: sleep
> broken') has not reached me through Linus' patches.
For me, this patch is correct. Don't know why it is not merged.
Cheers,
--
Ducrot Bruno
-- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy?
-- Don't know. Don't care.