Hi all/Andrew/Martin,
I noticed regression in a few tests,
I deleted the results of tests that don't show differences between the two kernel version.
Hope it helps.
Ciao,
Paolo
2.5.67
2.5.69
creat-clo 10010 86.8132 86813.19 File Creations and Closes/second
creat-clo 10030 22.0339 22033.90 File Creations and Closes/second
^^^^BIG REGRESSION
page_test 10000 110.2 187340.00 System Allocations & Pages/second
page_test 10000 102.9 174930.00 System Allocations & Pages/second
^^^^REGRESSION
brk_test 10010 51.8482 881418.58 System Memory Allocations/second
brk_test 10010 45.0549 765934.07 System Memory Allocations/second
^^^^REGRESSION
jmp_test 10000 4270.1 4270100.00 Non-local gotos/second
jmp_test 10000 4268.9 4268900.00 Non-local gotos/second
signal_test 10010 159.84 159840.16 Signal Traps/second
signal_test 10000 109 109000.00 Signal Traps/second
^^^^REGRESSION
exec_test 10040 12.9482 64.74 Program Loads/second
exec_test 10050 11.7413 58.71 Program Loads/second
^^^^REGRESSION
fork_test 10020 27.3453 2734.53 Task Creations/second
fork_test 10020 23.4531 2345.31 Task Creations/second
^^^^REGRESSION
link_test 10000 146.5 9229.50 Link/Unlink Pairs/second
link_test 10020 55.1896 3476.95 Link/Unlink Pairs/second
^^^^REGRESSION
disk_rr 10020 7.08583 36279.44 Random Disk Reads (K)/second
disk_rr 10020 5.28942 27081.84 Random Disk Reads (K)/second
^^^^REGRESSION
disk_rw 10140 6.41026 32820.51 Random Disk Writes (K)/second
disk_rw 10100 4.85149 24839.60 Random Disk Writes (K)/second
^^^^REGRESSION
disk_rd 10020 38.024 194682.63 Sequential Disk Reads (K)/second
disk_rd 10010 37.7622 193342.66 Sequential Disk Reads (K)/second
disk_wrt 10090 8.72151 44654.11 Sequential Disk Writes (K)/second
disk_wrt 10050 6.16915 31586.07 Sequential Disk Writes (K)/second
^^^^REGRESSION
disk_cp 10070 7.24926 37116.19 Disk Copies (K)/second
disk_cp 10140 5.32544 27266.27 Disk Copies (K)/second
^^^^REGRESSION
sync_disk_rw 14450 0.0692042 177.16 Sync Random Disk Writes (K)/second
sync_disk_rw 14680 0.0681199 174.39 Sync Random Disk Writes (K)/second
sync_disk_wrt 11330 0.0882613 225.95 Sync Sequential Disk Writes (K)/second
sync_disk_wrt 10260 0.0974659 249.51 Sync Sequential Disk Writes (K)/second
sync_disk_cp 11080 0.0902527 231.05 Sync Disk Copies (K)/second
sync_disk_cp 10040 0.0996016 254.98 Sync Disk Copies (K)/second
disk_src 10000 113 8475.00 Directory Searches/second
disk_src 10020 45.2096 3390.72 Directory Searches/second
^^^^BIG REGRESSION
mem_rtns_1 10030 21.4357 643070.79 Dynamic Memory Operations/second
mem_rtns_1 10000 25 750000.00 Dynamic Memory Operations/second
mem_rtns_2 10000 1631.9 163190.00 Block Memory Operations/second
mem_rtns_2 10010 1614.79 161478.52 Block Memory Operations/second
misc_rtns_1 10000 728.2 7282.00 Auxiliary Loops/second
misc_rtns_1 10000 353.1 3531.00 Auxiliary Loops/second
^^^^BIG REGRESSION
shell_rtns_1 10020 23.7525 23.75 Shell Scripts/second
shell_rtns_1 10040 19.9203 19.92 Shell Scripts/second
^^^^ REGRESSION
shell_rtns_2 10040 23.8048 23.80 Shell Scripts/second
shell_rtns_2 10020 19.9601 19.96 Shell Scripts/second
^^^^REGRESSION
shell_rtns_3 10040 23.8048 23.80 Shell Scripts/second
shell_rtns_3 10040 19.9203 19.92 Shell Scripts/second
^^^^REGRESSION
tcp_test 10000 605.8 54522.00 TCP/IP Messages/second
tcp_test 10000 176.9 15921.00 TCP/IP Messages/second
^^^^REGRESSION
udp_test 10000 1091.5 109150.00 UDP/IP DataGrams/second
udp_test 10010 446.853 44685.31 UDP/IP DataGrams/second
^^^^REGRESSION
fifo_test 10000 1045.6 104560.00 FIFO Messages/second
fifo_test 10000 772.1 77210.00 FIFO Messages/second
^^^^REGRESSION
stream_pipe 10000 2228.3 222830.00 Stream Pipe Messages/second
stream_pipe 10000 738 73800.00 Stream Pipe Messages/second
^^^^REGRESSION
dgram_pipe 10000 2204.7 220470.00 DataGram Pipe Messages/second
dgram_pipe 10010 718.581 71858.14 DataGram Pipe Messages/second
^^^^REGRESSION
pipe_cpy 10000 3165.3 316530.00 Pipe Messages/second
pipe_cpy 10000 2787.1 278710.00 Pipe Messages/second
^^^^REGRESSION
--
______________________________________________
http://www.linuxmail.org/
Now with e-mail forwarding for only US$5.95/yr
Powered by Outblaze
"Paolo Ciarrocchi" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi all/Andrew/Martin,
> I noticed regression in a few tests,
> I deleted the results of tests that don't show differences between the two kernel version.
>
> Hope it helps.
>
> Ciao,
> Paolo
>
> 2.5.67
> 2.5.69
>
> creat-clo 10010 86.8132 86813.19 File Creations and Closes/second
> creat-clo 10030 22.0339 22033.90 File Creations and Closes/second
> ^^^^BIG REGRESSION
I cannot repeat any of this. In fact 2.5.69-mm is a bit faster than
2.5.67.
I tested ext2 mainly. But a spot-check of creat-clo on reiserfs showed
no regression either.
From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 00:47:07 -0700
To: "Paolo Ciarrocchi" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [BENCHMARK AIM9] Regressions in 2.5.69
> "Paolo Ciarrocchi" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all/Andrew/Martin,
> > I noticed regression in a few tests,
> > I deleted the results of tests that don't show differences between the two kernel version.
> >
> > Hope it helps.
> >
> > Ciao,
> > Paolo
> >
> > 2.5.67
> > 2.5.69
> >
> > creat-clo 10010 86.8132 86813.19 File Creations and Closes/second
> > creat-clo 10030 22.0339 22033.90 File Creations and Closes/second
> > ^^^^BIG REGRESSION
>
> I cannot repeat any of this. In fact 2.5.69-mm is a bit faster than
> 2.5.67.
>
> I tested ext2 mainly. But a spot-check of creat-clo on reiserfs showed
> no regression either.
Ok, thanks Andrew.
I dunno what happened during the test.
I'll try again to run the test with both the kernel.
I'll back to you if I'm able to reproduce those numbers.
Ciao,
Paolo
--
______________________________________________
http://www.linuxmail.org/
Now with e-mail forwarding for only US$5.95/yr
Powered by Outblaze