Cheers,
Kyle Moffett
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCM/CS/IT/U d- s++: a18 C++++>$ UB/L/X/*++++(+)>$ P+++(++++)>$
L++++(+++) E W++(+) N+++(++) o? K? w--- O? M++ V? PS+() PE+(-) Y+
PGP+++ t+(+++) 5 X R? tv-(--) b++++(++) DI+ D+ G e->++++$ h!*()>++$ r
!y?(-)
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
On 005, 01 05, 2005 at 05:52:14PM -0500, Kyle Moffett wrote:
> This removes two simple siig functions that should just be integrated
> into the calling code.
Good idea, wrong patch. You deleted wrapper code, but actual init
functions left not exported for use by parport_serial module.
Even worse, they are left static, so monilithic kernel build will
not work too :/
Did you compiled the kernel with your patch applied ?
Please use attached patch instead.
--
Andrey Panin | Linux and UNIX system administrator
[email protected] | PGP key: wwwkeys.pgp.net
On Jan 14, 2005, at 07:01, Andrey Panin wrote:
> On 005, 01 05, 2005 at 05:52:14PM -0500, Kyle Moffett wrote:
>> This removes two simple siig functions that should just be integrated
>> into the calling code.
>
> Good idea, wrong patch. You deleted wrapper code, but actual init
> functions left not exported for use by parport_serial module.
> Even worse, they are left static, so monilithic kernel build will
> not work too :/
Oops, sorry!
> Did you compiled the kernel with your patch applied ?
Yes, but I think I managed to lose some changes somewhere in the
process of managing my patchset.
> Please use attached patch instead.
Thanks,
Kyle Moffett
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GCM/CS/IT/U d- s++: a18 C++++>$ UB/L/X/*++++(+)>$ P+++(++++)>$
L++++(+++) E W++(+) N+++(++) o? K? w--- O? M++ V? PS+() PE+(-) Y+
PGP+++ t+(+++) 5 X R? tv-(--) b++++(++) DI+ D+ G e->++++$ h!*()>++$ r
!y?(-)
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------