2008-06-02 12:34:59

by Yasunori Goto

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 08/14] bootmem: clean up alloc_bootmem_core

Hello.

> + /*
> + * Reserve the area now:
> + */
> + for (i = PFN_DOWN(new_start) + merge; i < PFN_UP(new_end); i++)
> + if (test_and_set_bit(i, bdata->node_bootmem_map))
> + BUG();
> +
> + region = phys_to_virt(bdata->node_boot_start + new_start);
> + memset(region, 0, size);
> + return region;

bdata->last_success doesn't seem to be updated in alloc_bootmem_core(),
it is updated in only __free().
Is it intended? If not, it should be updated, I suppose....

Bye.

--
Yasunori Goto


2008-06-02 13:58:32

by Johannes Weiner

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 08/14] bootmem: clean up alloc_bootmem_core

Hi,

Yasunori Goto <[email protected]> writes:

> Hello.
>
>> + /*
>> + * Reserve the area now:
>> + */
>> + for (i = PFN_DOWN(new_start) + merge; i < PFN_UP(new_end); i++)
>> + if (test_and_set_bit(i, bdata->node_bootmem_map))
>> + BUG();
>> +
>> + region = phys_to_virt(bdata->node_boot_start + new_start);
>> + memset(region, 0, size);
>> + return region;
>
> bdata->last_success doesn't seem to be updated in alloc_bootmem_core(),
> it is updated in only __free().
> Is it intended? If not, it should be updated, I suppose....

Yeah, I forgot that. See my reply to `bootmem: respect goal more
likely'.

Thanks for reviewing!

Hannes

2008-06-02 14:49:32

by Yasunori Goto

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 08/14] bootmem: clean up alloc_bootmem_core

> Hi,
>
> Yasunori Goto <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > Hello.
> >
> >> + /*
> >> + * Reserve the area now:
> >> + */
> >> + for (i = PFN_DOWN(new_start) + merge; i < PFN_UP(new_end); i++)
> >> + if (test_and_set_bit(i, bdata->node_bootmem_map))
> >> + BUG();
> >> +
> >> + region = phys_to_virt(bdata->node_boot_start + new_start);
> >> + memset(region, 0, size);
> >> + return region;
> >
> > bdata->last_success doesn't seem to be updated in alloc_bootmem_core(),
> > it is updated in only __free().
> > Is it intended? If not, it should be updated, I suppose....
>
> Yeah, I forgot that. See my reply to `bootmem: respect goal more
> likely'.
>
> Thanks for reviewing!
>
> Hannes

Oh, I didn't notice it.
Ok. I'll test newer version on my ia64 box.


Bye.


--
Yasunori Goto