2010-06-01 20:03:57

by Mikael Pettersson

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [2.6.35-rc1 regression] tg3 vpd r/w failed

Booting 2.6.35-rc1 on a Sun Blade 2500 Red with builtin tg3 I get:

tg3.c:v3.110 (April 9, 2010)
PCI: Enabling device: (0000:00:03.0), cmd 2
...
tg3 0000:00:03.0: vpd r/w failed. This is likely a firmware bug on this device. Contact the card vendor for a firmware update.
tg3 0000:00:03.0: vpd r/w failed. This is likely a firmware bug on this device. Contact the card vendor for a firmware update.
tg3 0000:00:03.0: vpd r/w failed. This is likely a firmware bug on this device. Contact the card vendor for a firmware update.
tg3 0000:00:03.0: eth0: Tigon3 [partno(none) rev 1002] (PCI:66MHz:64-bit) MAC address ...
tg3 0000:00:03.0: eth0: attached PHY is 5703 (10/100/1000Base-T Ethernet) (WireSpeed[1])
tg3 0000:00:03.0: eth0: RXcsums[1] LinkChgREG[0] MIirq[0] ASF[0] TSOcap[1]
tg3 0000:00:03.0: eth0: dma_rwctrl[763f0000] dma_mask[32-bit]
...
tg3 0000:00:03.0: eth0: No firmware running
tg3 0000:00:03.0: eth0: Link is up at 100 Mbps, full duplex
tg3 0000:00:03.0: eth0: Flow control is on for TX and on for RX

The three 'vpd r/w failed' messages are new and did not occur with 2.6.34
or earlier kernels.

/Mikael


2010-06-01 22:32:01

by David Miller

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [2.6.35-rc1 regression] tg3 vpd r/w failed


Mikael I'm getting tired of continuing to add the proper
mailing list CC: for your sparc bug reports. Please make
sure to add [email protected] to your reports
in the future.

Thanks.

> Booting 2.6.35-rc1 on a Sun Blade 2500 Red with builtin tg3 I get:
>
> tg3.c:v3.110 (April 9, 2010)
> PCI: Enabling device: (0000:00:03.0), cmd 2
> ...
> tg3 0000:00:03.0: vpd r/w failed. This is likely a firmware bug on this device. Contact the card vendor for a firmware update.
> tg3 0000:00:03.0: vpd r/w failed. This is likely a firmware bug on this device. Contact the card vendor for a firmware update.
> tg3 0000:00:03.0: vpd r/w failed. This is likely a firmware bug on this device. Contact the card vendor for a firmware update.
> tg3 0000:00:03.0: eth0: Tigon3 [partno(none) rev 1002] (PCI:66MHz:64-bit) MAC address ...
> tg3 0000:00:03.0: eth0: attached PHY is 5703 (10/100/1000Base-T Ethernet) (WireSpeed[1])
> tg3 0000:00:03.0: eth0: RXcsums[1] LinkChgREG[0] MIirq[0] ASF[0] TSOcap[1]
> tg3 0000:00:03.0: eth0: dma_rwctrl[763f0000] dma_mask[32-bit]
> ...
> tg3 0000:00:03.0: eth0: No firmware running
> tg3 0000:00:03.0: eth0: Link is up at 100 Mbps, full duplex
> tg3 0000:00:03.0: eth0: Flow control is on for TX and on for RX
>
> The three 'vpd r/w failed' messages are new and did not occur with 2.6.34
> or earlier kernels.
>
> /Mikael

2010-06-01 23:29:09

by Matt Carlson

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [2.6.35-rc1 regression] tg3 vpd r/w failed

On Tue, Jun 01, 2010 at 03:32:09PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>
> Mikael I'm getting tired of continuing to add the proper
> mailing list CC: for your sparc bug reports. Please make
> sure to add [email protected] to your reports
> in the future.
>
> Thanks.
>
> > Booting 2.6.35-rc1 on a Sun Blade 2500 Red with builtin tg3 I get:
> >
> > tg3.c:v3.110 (April 9, 2010)
> > PCI: Enabling device: (0000:00:03.0), cmd 2
> > ...
> > tg3 0000:00:03.0: vpd r/w failed. This is likely a firmware bug on this device. Contact the card vendor for a firmware update.
> > tg3 0000:00:03.0: vpd r/w failed. This is likely a firmware bug on this device. Contact the card vendor for a firmware update.
> > tg3 0000:00:03.0: vpd r/w failed. This is likely a firmware bug on this device. Contact the card vendor for a firmware update.
> > tg3 0000:00:03.0: eth0: Tigon3 [partno(none) rev 1002] (PCI:66MHz:64-bit) MAC address ...
> > tg3 0000:00:03.0: eth0: attached PHY is 5703 (10/100/1000Base-T Ethernet) (WireSpeed[1])
> > tg3 0000:00:03.0: eth0: RXcsums[1] LinkChgREG[0] MIirq[0] ASF[0] TSOcap[1]
> > tg3 0000:00:03.0: eth0: dma_rwctrl[763f0000] dma_mask[32-bit]
> > ...
> > tg3 0000:00:03.0: eth0: No firmware running
> > tg3 0000:00:03.0: eth0: Link is up at 100 Mbps, full duplex
> > tg3 0000:00:03.0: eth0: Flow control is on for TX and on for RX
> >
> > The three 'vpd r/w failed' messages are new and did not occur with 2.6.34
> > or earlier kernels.

These messages are originating from the PCI layer. It looks like your
device does not have NVRAM, which is a known issue. I have an idea on
how to reduce the noise, but let me investigate it a little more before
I commit to it.