From: Peter Huewe <[email protected]>
This patch fixes a build failure[1-2] by adding the missing asm/memory.h
include needed for arch_is_coherent().
Signed-off-by: Peter Huewe <[email protected]>
---
KernelVersion: linux-next-20101215
Used configs: hackkit_defconfig (arm), ep93xx_defconfig (arm)
References:
[1] http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/3651495/
[2] http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/3651425/
Error Message:
In file included from include/linux/list_bl.h:5,
from include/linux/rculist_bl.h:7,
from include/linux/dcache.h:7,
from include/linux/fs.h:381,
from arch/arm/mm/mmap.c:4:
include/linux/bit_spinlock.h: In function 'bit_spin_unlock':
include/linux/bit_spinlock.h:61: error: implicit declaration of function 'arch_is_coherent'
include/linux/bit_spinlock.h | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/bit_spinlock.h b/include/linux/bit_spinlock.h
index e612575..053fad7 100644
--- a/include/linux/bit_spinlock.h
+++ b/include/linux/bit_spinlock.h
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/preempt.h>
#include <asm/atomic.h>
+#include <asm/memory.h>
/*
* bit-based spin_lock()
--
1.7.2.2
Hi Peter,
On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 22:04:18 +0100 Peter Huewe <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> From: Peter Huewe <[email protected]>
>
> This patch fixes a build failure[1-2] by adding the missing asm/memory.h
> include needed for arch_is_coherent().
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Huewe <[email protected]>
> ---
> KernelVersion: linux-next-20101215
> Used configs: hackkit_defconfig (arm), ep93xx_defconfig (arm)
>
> References:
> [1] http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/3651495/
> [2] http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/3651425/
>
> Error Message:
> In file included from include/linux/list_bl.h:5,
> from include/linux/rculist_bl.h:7,
> from include/linux/dcache.h:7,
> from include/linux/fs.h:381,
> from arch/arm/mm/mmap.c:4:
> include/linux/bit_spinlock.h: In function 'bit_spin_unlock':
> include/linux/bit_spinlock.h:61: error: implicit declaration of function 'arch_is_coherent'
All (or most) of the above information should be in the commit message
(so above the "Signed-off-by").
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell [email protected]
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
From: Peter Huewe <[email protected]>
This patch fixes a build failure[1-2] by adding the missing asm/memory.h
include needed for arch_is_coherent().
Error message:
In file included from include/linux/list_bl.h:5,
from include/linux/rculist_bl.h:7,
from include/linux/dcache.h:7,
from include/linux/fs.h:381,
from arch/arm/mm/mmap.c:4:
include/linux/bit_spinlock.h: In function 'bit_spin_unlock':
include/linux/bit_spinlock.h:61: error: implicit declaration of function
'arch_is_coherent'
KernelVersion: linux-next-20101215
Used configs: hackkit_defconfig (arm), ep93xx_defconfig (arm)
References:
[1] http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/3651495/
[2] http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/3651425/
Signed-off-by: Peter Huewe <[email protected]>
---
v2:
moved additional information in the commit message.
include/linux/bit_spinlock.h | 1 +
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/bit_spinlock.h b/include/linux/bit_spinlock.h
index e612575..053fad7 100644
--- a/include/linux/bit_spinlock.h
+++ b/include/linux/bit_spinlock.h
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
#include <linux/kernel.h>
#include <linux/preempt.h>
#include <asm/atomic.h>
+#include <asm/memory.h>
/*
* bit-based spin_lock()
--
1.7.2.2
Hi Peter,
Thanks for this.
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 12:40:54AM +0100, Peter H?we wrote:
> From: Peter Huewe <[email protected]>
>
> This patch fixes a build failure[1-2] by adding the missing asm/memory.h
> include needed for arch_is_coherent().
>
> Error message:
> In file included from include/linux/list_bl.h:5,
> from include/linux/rculist_bl.h:7,
> from include/linux/dcache.h:7,
> from include/linux/fs.h:381,
> from arch/arm/mm/mmap.c:4:
> include/linux/bit_spinlock.h: In function 'bit_spin_unlock':
> include/linux/bit_spinlock.h:61: error: implicit declaration of function
> 'arch_is_coherent'
>
> KernelVersion: linux-next-20101215
> Used configs: hackkit_defconfig (arm), ep93xx_defconfig (arm)
>
> References:
> [1] http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/3651495/
> [2] http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/3651425/
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Huewe <[email protected]>
> ---
> v2:
> moved additional information in the commit message.
>
> include/linux/bit_spinlock.h | 1 +
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/bit_spinlock.h b/include/linux/bit_spinlock.h
> index e612575..053fad7 100644
> --- a/include/linux/bit_spinlock.h
> +++ b/include/linux/bit_spinlock.h
> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> #include <linux/preempt.h>
> #include <asm/atomic.h>
> +#include <asm/memory.h>
>
> /*
> * bit-based spin_lock()
The problem is actually in ARM's asm/atomic.h file -- they declare the
smp_mb__before_clear_bit() etc. without providing the necessary includes
to actually call it. Can you include asm/memory.h in there?
Thanks,
Nick