On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Dave Chinner <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 09:36:17PM -0200, Thiago Farina wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Please, take a look.
>>
>> Patch attached.
>
> It's a good start for a cleanup, but there's no point in removing
> the boolean_t from one file and then not removing it from the rest
> of the XFS code. It's only used in a handful of places, so just
> remove it completely.
>
Done.
Please, take another look.
> Also, can you please place patches in line rather than attaching
> them. Attaching them means they cannot be quoted in reply. See
> Documentation/SubmittingPatches and Documentation/email-clients.txt
> for guidelines.
>
Sorry, patch attached.
Thanks,
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:36:47PM -0200, Thiago Farina wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Dave Chinner <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 09:36:17PM -0200, Thiago Farina wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Please, take a look.
> >>
> >> Patch attached.
> >
> > It's a good start for a cleanup, but there's no point in removing
> > the boolean_t from one file and then not removing it from the rest
> > of the XFS code. It's only used in a handful of places, so just
> > remove it completely.
> >
> Done.
>
> Please, take another look.
>
> > Also, can you please place patches in line rather than attaching
> > them. Attaching them means they cannot be quoted in reply. See
> > Documentation/SubmittingPatches and Documentation/email-clients.txt
> > for guidelines.
> >
> Sorry, patch attached.
It's still attached as a base64 encoded attachment, not as inline
text....
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
[email protected]
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 11:53 PM, Dave Chinner <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:36:47PM -0200, Thiago Farina wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Dave Chinner <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 09:36:17PM -0200, Thiago Farina wrote:
>> >> Hi,
>> >>
>> >> Please, take a look.
>> >>
>> >> Patch attached.
>> >
>> > It's a good start for a cleanup, but there's no point in removing
>> > the boolean_t from one file and then not removing it from the rest
>> > of the XFS code. It's only used in a handful of places, so just
>> > remove it completely.
>> >
>> Done.
>>
>> Please, take another look.
>>
>> > Also, can you please place patches in line rather than attaching
>> > them. Attaching them means they cannot be quoted in reply. See
>> > Documentation/SubmittingPatches and Documentation/email-clients.txt
>> > for guidelines.
>> >
>> Sorry, patch attached.
>
> It's still attached as a base64 encoded attachment, not as inline
> text....
>
Yep, sorry about that. Is just a text file from $(git format-patch master);
Hi Thiago,
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:02:14AM -0200, Thiago Farina wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 11:53 PM, Dave Chinner <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:36:47PM -0200, Thiago Farina wrote:
> >> On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 10:24 PM, Dave Chinner <[email protected]> wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 09:36:17PM -0200, Thiago Farina wrote:
> >> >> Hi,
> >> >>
> >> >> Please, take a look.
> >> >>
> >> >> Patch attached.
> >> >
> >> > It's a good start for a cleanup, but there's no point in removing
> >> > the boolean_t from one file and then not removing it from the rest
> >> > of the XFS code. It's only used in a handful of places, so just
> >> > remove it completely.
> >> >
> >> Done.
> >>
> >> Please, take another look.
> >>
> >> > Also, can you please place patches in line rather than attaching
> >> > them. Attaching them means they cannot be quoted in reply. See
> >> > Documentation/SubmittingPatches and Documentation/email-clients.txt
> >> > for guidelines.
> >> >
> >> Sorry, patch attached.
> >
> > It's still attached as a base64 encoded attachment, not as inline
> > text....
> >
> Yep, sorry about that. Is just a text file from $(git format-patch master);
If you don't mind another try... it would be helpful if you could resend the
patch inline. It helps to facilitate a discussion of the patch along with your
text should it be necessary.
You're only touching xfs, so you can drop linux-kernel if you want.
Thanks,
Ben