On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 11:17:07AM +0800, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> We only enable one side interrupt for each stream since over/underrun
> on the opposite stream would be resulted from what we previously did,
> enabling TERE but remaining FRDE disabled, even though the xrun on the
> opposite direction will not break the current stream.
This still doesn't apply against fsl-sai (nor for-next).
On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 01:07:15PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 11:17:07AM +0800, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> > We only enable one side interrupt for each stream since over/underrun
> > on the opposite stream would be resulted from what we previously did,
> > enabling TERE but remaining FRDE disabled, even though the xrun on the
> > opposite direction will not break the current stream.
>
> This still doesn't apply against fsl-sai (nor for-next).
Sir, I just rebased my for-next branch again and found that it's missing
two applied patches: "ASoC: fsl_sai: Add isr to deal with error flag" and
"ASoC: fsl_sai: Improve fsl_sai_isr()", so that's why this PATCH-2 could
not be applied against it as it needs the macro that's included in the
patch "ASoC: fsl_sai: Add isr to deal with error flag".
What should I do now?
Thank you,
Nicolin
On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 09:21:57PM +0800, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> Sir, I just rebased my for-next branch again and found that it's missing
> two applied patches: "ASoC: fsl_sai: Add isr to deal with error flag" and
> "ASoC: fsl_sai: Improve fsl_sai_isr()", so that's why this PATCH-2 could
> not be applied against it as it needs the macro that's included in the
> patch "ASoC: fsl_sai: Add isr to deal with error flag".
Ah, those dropped out of -next due to the merge window. I've applied
your new patch now.
On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 05:42:54PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 01, 2014 at 09:21:57PM +0800, Nicolin Chen wrote:
>
> > Sir, I just rebased my for-next branch again and found that it's missing
> > two applied patches: "ASoC: fsl_sai: Add isr to deal with error flag" and
> > "ASoC: fsl_sai: Improve fsl_sai_isr()", so that's why this PATCH-2 could
> > not be applied against it as it needs the macro that's included in the
> > patch "ASoC: fsl_sai: Add isr to deal with error flag".
>
> Ah, those dropped out of -next due to the merge window. I've applied
> your new patch now.
I can find them on the fsl-sai topic now. Thank you.