2014-10-31 17:28:57

by Lennart Sorensen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: drivers: net: cpsw: Fix broken loop condition in switch mode

0d961b3b52f566f823070ce2366511a7f64b928c (drivers: net: cpsw: fix buggy
loop condition) accidentally fixed a loop comparison in too many places
while fixing a real bug.

It was correct to fix the dual_emac mode section since there 'i' is used
as an index into priv->slaves which is a 0 based array.

However the other two changes (which are only used in switch mode)
are wrong since there 'i' is actually the ALE port number, and port 0
is the host port, while port 1 and up are the slave ports.

Putting the loop condition back in the switch mode section fixes it.

A comment has been added to point out the intent clearly to avoid future
confusion. Also a comment is fixed that said the opposite of what was
actually happening.

Signed-off-by: Len Sorensen <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Heiko Schocher <[email protected]>

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
index 952e1e4..4683196 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/cpsw.c
@@ -591,8 +591,8 @@ static void cpsw_set_promiscious(struct net_device *ndev, bool enable)
if (enable) {
unsigned long timeout = jiffies + HZ;

- /* Disable Learn for all ports */
- for (i = 0; i < priv->data.slaves; i++) {
+ /* Disable Learn for all ports (host is port 0 and slaves are port 1 and up */
+ for (i = 0; i <= priv->data.slaves; i++) {
cpsw_ale_control_set(ale, i,
ALE_PORT_NOLEARN, 1);
cpsw_ale_control_set(ale, i,
@@ -616,11 +616,11 @@ static void cpsw_set_promiscious(struct net_device *ndev, bool enable)
cpsw_ale_control_set(ale, 0, ALE_P0_UNI_FLOOD, 1);
dev_dbg(&ndev->dev, "promiscuity enabled\n");
} else {
- /* Flood All Unicast Packets to Host port */
+ /* Don't Flood All Unicast Packets to Host port */
cpsw_ale_control_set(ale, 0, ALE_P0_UNI_FLOOD, 0);

- /* Enable Learn for all ports */
- for (i = 0; i < priv->data.slaves; i++) {
+ /* Enable Learn for all ports (host is port 0 and slaves are port 1 and up */
+ for (i = 0; i <= priv->data.slaves; i++) {
cpsw_ale_control_set(ale, i,
ALE_PORT_NOLEARN, 0);
cpsw_ale_control_set(ale, i,

--
Len Sorensen


2014-10-31 20:17:16

by David Miller

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: drivers: net: cpsw: Fix broken loop condition in switch mode

From: "Lennart Sorensen" <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2014 13:28:54 -0400

> 0d961b3b52f566f823070ce2366511a7f64b928c (drivers: net: cpsw: fix buggy
> loop condition) accidentally fixed a loop comparison in too many places
> while fixing a real bug.
>
> It was correct to fix the dual_emac mode section since there 'i' is used
> as an index into priv->slaves which is a 0 based array.
>
> However the other two changes (which are only used in switch mode)
> are wrong since there 'i' is actually the ALE port number, and port 0
> is the host port, while port 1 and up are the slave ports.
>
> Putting the loop condition back in the switch mode section fixes it.
>
> A comment has been added to point out the intent clearly to avoid future
> confusion. Also a comment is fixed that said the opposite of what was
> actually happening.
>
> Signed-off-by: Len Sorensen <[email protected]>
> Acked-by: Heiko Schocher <[email protected]>

Applied.