2015-12-01 23:43:54

by Geyslan G. Bem

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] kvm: remove unused variable 'vcpu_book3s'

The vcpu_book3s struct is assigned but never used. So remove it.

Signed-off-by: Geyslan G. Bem <[email protected]>
---
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu.c
index 774a253..9bf7031 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu.c
@@ -377,15 +377,12 @@ no_seg_found:

static void kvmppc_mmu_book3s_64_slbmte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 rs, u64 rb)
{
- struct kvmppc_vcpu_book3s *vcpu_book3s;
u64 esid, esid_1t;
int slb_nr;
struct kvmppc_slb *slbe;

dprintk("KVM MMU: slbmte(0x%llx, 0x%llx)\n", rs, rb);

- vcpu_book3s = to_book3s(vcpu);
-
esid = GET_ESID(rb);
esid_1t = GET_ESID_1T(rb);
slb_nr = rb & 0xfff;
--
2.6.2


2015-12-02 00:34:39

by Daniel Axtens

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: remove unused variable 'vcpu_book3s'

"Geyslan G. Bem" <[email protected]> writes:

> The vcpu_book3s struct is assigned but never used. So remove it.

Just out of interest, how did you find this? Compiler warning? Static
analysis? Manual inspection?

Thanks in advance!

Regards,
Daniel

>
> Signed-off-by: Geyslan G. Bem <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu.c | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu.c
> index 774a253..9bf7031 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu.c
> @@ -377,15 +377,12 @@ no_seg_found:
>
> static void kvmppc_mmu_book3s_64_slbmte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 rs, u64 rb)
> {
> - struct kvmppc_vcpu_book3s *vcpu_book3s;
> u64 esid, esid_1t;
> int slb_nr;
> struct kvmppc_slb *slbe;
>
> dprintk("KVM MMU: slbmte(0x%llx, 0x%llx)\n", rs, rb);
>
> - vcpu_book3s = to_book3s(vcpu);
> -
> esid = GET_ESID(rb);
> esid_1t = GET_ESID_1T(rb);
> slb_nr = rb & 0xfff;
> --
> 2.6.2
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev


Attachments:
signature.asc (859.00 B)

2015-12-02 01:11:17

by Geyslan G. Bem

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: remove unused variable 'vcpu_book3s'

2015-12-01 21:34 GMT-03:00 Daniel Axtens <[email protected]>:
> "Geyslan G. Bem" <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> The vcpu_book3s struct is assigned but never used. So remove it.
>
> Just out of interest, how did you find this? Compiler warning? Static
> analysis? Manual inspection?

Sorry, I should have done the patch self contained. I caught it
through static analysis (cppcheck).

>
> Thanks in advance!

You're welcome.

>
> Regards,
> Daniel
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Geyslan G. Bem <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu.c | 3 ---
>> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu.c
>> index 774a253..9bf7031 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_mmu.c
>> @@ -377,15 +377,12 @@ no_seg_found:
>>
>> static void kvmppc_mmu_book3s_64_slbmte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 rs, u64 rb)
>> {
>> - struct kvmppc_vcpu_book3s *vcpu_book3s;
>> u64 esid, esid_1t;
>> int slb_nr;
>> struct kvmppc_slb *slbe;
>>
>> dprintk("KVM MMU: slbmte(0x%llx, 0x%llx)\n", rs, rb);
>>
>> - vcpu_book3s = to_book3s(vcpu);
>> -
>> esid = GET_ESID(rb);
>> esid_1t = GET_ESID_1T(rb);
>> slb_nr = rb & 0xfff;
>> --
>> 2.6.2
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Linuxppc-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev



--
Regards,

Geyslan G. Bem
hackingbits.com

2015-12-10 00:40:17

by Paul Mackerras

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: remove unused variable 'vcpu_book3s'

On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 08:42:10PM -0300, Geyslan G. Bem wrote:
> The vcpu_book3s struct is assigned but never used. So remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geyslan G. Bem <[email protected]>

Thanks, applied to my kvm-ppc-next branch.

Paul.