From: Niklas Cassel <[email protected]>
>From what I can tell, spin_lock(&priv->lock) is not needed, since the
phy_ethtool_ksettings_set call is not given the priv struct.
phy_start_aneg takes the phydev->lock. Calls to phy_adjust_link
from phy_state_machine also takes the phydev->lock.
[ 13.718319] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/mutex.c:97
[ 13.726717] in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, pid: 1307, name: ethtool
[ 13.742115] Hardware name: Axis ARTPEC-6 Platform
[ 13.746829] [<80110568>] (unwind_backtrace) from [<8010c2bc>] (show_stack+0x18/0x1c)
[ 13.754575] [<8010c2bc>] (show_stack) from [<80433484>] (dump_stack+0x80/0xa0)
[ 13.761801] [<80433484>] (dump_stack) from [<80145428>] (___might_sleep+0x108/0x170)
[ 13.769554] [<80145428>] (___might_sleep) from [<806c9b50>] (mutex_lock+0x24/0x44)
[ 13.777128] [<806c9b50>] (mutex_lock) from [<8050cbc0>] (phy_start_aneg+0x1c/0x13c)
[ 13.784783] [<8050cbc0>] (phy_start_aneg) from [<8050d338>] (phy_ethtool_ksettings_set+0x98/0xd0)
[ 13.793656] [<8050d338>] (phy_ethtool_ksettings_set) from [<80517adc>] (stmmac_ethtool_set_link_ksettings+0xa0/0xb4)
[ 13.804184] [<80517adc>] (stmmac_ethtool_set_link_ksettings) from [<805c5138>] (ethtool_set_settings+0xd4/0x13c)
[ 13.814358] [<805c5138>] (ethtool_set_settings) from [<805c9718>] (dev_ethtool+0x13c4/0x211c)
[ 13.822882] [<805c9718>] (dev_ethtool) from [<805dc7c0>] (dev_ioctl+0x480/0x8e0)
[ 13.830291] [<805dc7c0>] (dev_ioctl) from [<80260e34>] (do_vfs_ioctl+0x94/0xa00)
[ 13.837699] [<80260e34>] (do_vfs_ioctl) from [<802617dc>] (SyS_ioctl+0x3c/0x60)
[ 13.845011] [<802617dc>] (SyS_ioctl) from [<801088bc>] (__sys_trace_return+0x0/0x10)
Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c
index d5a8122b6033..6ab7e2bdcadd 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_ethtool.c
@@ -406,9 +406,7 @@ stmmac_ethtool_set_link_ksettings(struct net_device *dev,
return 0;
}
- spin_lock(&priv->lock);
rc = phy_ethtool_ksettings_set(phy, cmd);
- spin_unlock(&priv->lock);
return rc;
}
--
2.1.4
From: Niklas Cassel <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 14:47:15 +0100
> From: Niklas Cassel <[email protected]>
>
> From what I can tell, spin_lock(&priv->lock) is not needed, since the
> phy_ethtool_ksettings_set call is not given the priv struct.
>
> phy_start_aneg takes the phydev->lock. Calls to phy_adjust_link
> from phy_state_machine also takes the phydev->lock.
...
> Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <[email protected]>
Applied, but please always be explicit about what tree you are targetting
this patch by properly annotating for it in your Subject line.
In this case that would be "Subject: [PATCH net-next] ..."