2017-06-23 13:54:31

by Geetha sowjanya

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [RESEND PATCH v9 3/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add workaround for Cavium ThunderX2 erratum #126

From: Geetha Sowjanya <[email protected]>

Cavium ThunderX2 SMMU doesn't support MSI and also doesn't have unique irq
lines for gerror, eventq and cmdq-sync.

New named irq "combined" is set as a errata workaround, which allows to
share the irq line by register single irq handler for all the interrupts.

Signed-off-by: Geetha sowjanya <[email protected]>
---
Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.txt | 1 +
.../devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu-v3.txt | 6 +
drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 57 ++++++++---
drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 100 ++++++++++++++-----
4 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.txt b/Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.txt
index 4693a32..42422f6 100644
--- a/Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.txt
+++ b/Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.txt
@@ -63,6 +63,7 @@ stable kernels.
| Cavium | ThunderX Core | #27456 | CAVIUM_ERRATUM_27456 |
| Cavium | ThunderX SMMUv2 | #27704 | N/A |
| Cavium | ThunderX2 SMMUv3| #74 | N/A |
+| Cavium | ThunderX2 SMMUv3| #126 | N/A |
| | | | |
| Freescale/NXP | LS2080A/LS1043A | A-008585 | FSL_ERRATUM_A008585 |
| | | | |
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu-v3.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu-v3.txt
index e7855cf..c9abbf3 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu-v3.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu-v3.txt
@@ -26,6 +26,12 @@ the PCIe specification.
* "priq" - PRI Queue not empty
* "cmdq-sync" - CMD_SYNC complete
* "gerror" - Global Error activated
+ * "combined" - The combined interrupt is optional,
+ and should only be provided if the
+ hardware supports just a single,
+ combined interrupt line.
+ If provided, then the combined interrupt
+ will be used in preference to any others.

- #iommu-cells : See the generic IOMMU binding described in
devicetree/bindings/pci/pci-iommu.txt
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
index bd97b7d..21c1ed3 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c
@@ -828,6 +828,18 @@ static int __init arm_smmu_v3_count_resources(struct acpi_iort_node *node)
return num_res;
}

+static bool arm_smmu_v3_is_combined_irq(struct acpi_iort_smmu_v3 *smmu)
+{
+ /*
+ * Cavium ThunderX2 implementation doesn't not support unique
+ * irq line. Use single irq line for all the SMMUv3 interrupts.
+ */
+ if (smmu->model == ACPI_IORT_SMMU_V3_CAVIUM_CN99XX)
+ return true;
+
+ return false;
+}
+
static unsigned long arm_smmu_v3_resource_size(struct acpi_iort_smmu_v3 *smmu)
{
/*
@@ -855,26 +867,39 @@ static void __init arm_smmu_v3_init_resources(struct resource *res,
res[num_res].flags = IORESOURCE_MEM;

num_res++;
+ if (arm_smmu_v3_is_combined_irq(smmu)) {
+ int irq = smmu->event_gsiv;

- if (smmu->event_gsiv)
- acpi_iort_register_irq(smmu->event_gsiv, "eventq",
- ACPI_EDGE_SENSITIVE,
- &res[num_res++]);
-
- if (smmu->pri_gsiv)
- acpi_iort_register_irq(smmu->pri_gsiv, "priq",
- ACPI_EDGE_SENSITIVE,
- &res[num_res++]);
-
- if (smmu->gerr_gsiv)
- acpi_iort_register_irq(smmu->gerr_gsiv, "gerror",
+ if (!(irq == smmu->pri_gsiv && irq == smmu->gerr_gsiv &&
+ irq == smmu->sync_gsiv)) {
+ pr_warn(FW_BUG "Incosistent combined GSIV configuration\n");
+ return;
+ }
+ acpi_iort_register_irq(smmu->event_gsiv, "combined",
ACPI_EDGE_SENSITIVE,
&res[num_res++]);
+ } else {

- if (smmu->sync_gsiv)
- acpi_iort_register_irq(smmu->sync_gsiv, "cmdq-sync",
- ACPI_EDGE_SENSITIVE,
- &res[num_res++]);
+ if (smmu->event_gsiv)
+ acpi_iort_register_irq(smmu->event_gsiv, "eventq",
+ ACPI_EDGE_SENSITIVE,
+ &res[num_res++]);
+
+ if (smmu->pri_gsiv)
+ acpi_iort_register_irq(smmu->pri_gsiv, "priq",
+ ACPI_EDGE_SENSITIVE,
+ &res[num_res++]);
+
+ if (smmu->gerr_gsiv)
+ acpi_iort_register_irq(smmu->gerr_gsiv, "gerror",
+ ACPI_EDGE_SENSITIVE,
+ &res[num_res++]);
+
+ if (smmu->sync_gsiv)
+ acpi_iort_register_irq(smmu->sync_gsiv, "cmdq-sync",
+ ACPI_EDGE_SENSITIVE,
+ &res[num_res++]);
+ }
}

static bool __init arm_smmu_v3_is_coherent(struct acpi_iort_node *node)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
index 2dea4a9..fd5a48c 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
@@ -605,6 +605,7 @@ struct arm_smmu_device {
struct arm_smmu_priq priq;

int gerr_irq;
+ int combined_irq;

unsigned long ias; /* IPA */
unsigned long oas; /* PA */
@@ -1314,6 +1315,24 @@ static irqreturn_t arm_smmu_gerror_handler(int irq, void *dev)
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}

+static irqreturn_t arm_smmu_combined_irq_thread(int irq, void *dev)
+{
+ struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = dev;
+
+ arm_smmu_evtq_thread(irq, dev);
+ if (smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_PRI)
+ arm_smmu_priq_thread(irq, dev);
+
+ return IRQ_HANDLED;
+}
+
+static irqreturn_t arm_smmu_combined_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev)
+{
+ arm_smmu_gerror_handler(irq, dev);
+ arm_smmu_cmdq_sync_handler(irq, dev);
+ return IRQ_WAKE_THREAD;
+}
+
/* IO_PGTABLE API */
static void __arm_smmu_tlb_sync(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
{
@@ -2230,18 +2249,9 @@ static void arm_smmu_setup_msis(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
devm_add_action(dev, arm_smmu_free_msis, dev);
}

-static int arm_smmu_setup_irqs(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
+static void arm_smmu_setup_unique_irqs(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
{
- int ret, irq;
- u32 irqen_flags = IRQ_CTRL_EVTQ_IRQEN | IRQ_CTRL_GERROR_IRQEN;
-
- /* Disable IRQs first */
- ret = arm_smmu_write_reg_sync(smmu, 0, ARM_SMMU_IRQ_CTRL,
- ARM_SMMU_IRQ_CTRLACK);
- if (ret) {
- dev_err(smmu->dev, "failed to disable irqs\n");
- return ret;
- }
+ int irq, ret;

arm_smmu_setup_msis(smmu);

@@ -2284,10 +2294,41 @@ static int arm_smmu_setup_irqs(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
if (ret < 0)
dev_warn(smmu->dev,
"failed to enable priq irq\n");
- else
- irqen_flags |= IRQ_CTRL_PRIQ_IRQEN;
}
}
+}
+
+static int arm_smmu_setup_irqs(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
+{
+ int ret, irq;
+ u32 irqen_flags = IRQ_CTRL_EVTQ_IRQEN | IRQ_CTRL_GERROR_IRQEN;
+
+ /* Disable IRQs first */
+ ret = arm_smmu_write_reg_sync(smmu, 0, ARM_SMMU_IRQ_CTRL,
+ ARM_SMMU_IRQ_CTRLACK);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(smmu->dev, "failed to disable irqs\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ irq = smmu->combined_irq;
+ if (irq) {
+ /*
+ * Cavium ThunderX2 implementation doesn't not support unique
+ * irq lines. Use single irq line for all the SMMUv3 interrupts.
+ */
+ ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(smmu->dev, irq,
+ arm_smmu_combined_irq_handler,
+ arm_smmu_combined_irq_thread,
+ IRQF_ONESHOT,
+ "arm-smmu-v3-combined-irq", smmu);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ dev_warn(smmu->dev, "failed to enable combined irq\n");
+ } else
+ arm_smmu_setup_unique_irqs(smmu);
+
+ if (smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_PRI)
+ irqen_flags |= IRQ_CTRL_PRIQ_IRQEN;

/* Enable interrupt generation on the SMMU */
ret = arm_smmu_write_reg_sync(smmu, irqen_flags,
@@ -2724,22 +2765,27 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return PTR_ERR(smmu->base);

/* Interrupt lines */
- irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "eventq");
- if (irq > 0)
- smmu->evtq.q.irq = irq;

- irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "priq");
+ irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "combined");
if (irq > 0)
- smmu->priq.q.irq = irq;
+ smmu->combined_irq = irq;
+ else {
+ irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "eventq");
+ if (irq > 0)
+ smmu->evtq.q.irq = irq;

- irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "cmdq-sync");
- if (irq > 0)
- smmu->cmdq.q.irq = irq;
+ irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "priq");
+ if (irq > 0)
+ smmu->priq.q.irq = irq;

- irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "gerror");
- if (irq > 0)
- smmu->gerr_irq = irq;
+ irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "cmdq-sync");
+ if (irq > 0)
+ smmu->cmdq.q.irq = irq;

+ irq = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "gerror");
+ if (irq > 0)
+ smmu->gerr_irq = irq;
+ }
/* Probe the h/w */
ret = arm_smmu_device_hw_probe(smmu);
if (ret)
--
1.7.1


2017-06-27 13:56:36

by Richter, Robert

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [Devel] [RESEND PATCH v9 3/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add workaround for Cavium ThunderX2 erratum #126

On 23.06.17 19:04:36, Geetha sowjanya wrote:
> From: Geetha Sowjanya <[email protected]>
>
> Cavium ThunderX2 SMMU doesn't support MSI and also doesn't have unique irq
> lines for gerror, eventq and cmdq-sync.
>
> New named irq "combined" is set as a errata workaround, which allows to
> share the irq line by register single irq handler for all the interrupts.
>
> Signed-off-by: Geetha sowjanya <[email protected]>
> ---
> Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.txt | 1 +
> .../devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu-v3.txt | 6 +
> drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 57 ++++++++---
> drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 100 ++++++++++++++-----
> 4 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)

> +static int arm_smmu_setup_irqs(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> +{
> + int ret, irq;
> + u32 irqen_flags = IRQ_CTRL_EVTQ_IRQEN | IRQ_CTRL_GERROR_IRQEN;
> +
> + /* Disable IRQs first */
> + ret = arm_smmu_write_reg_sync(smmu, 0, ARM_SMMU_IRQ_CTRL,
> + ARM_SMMU_IRQ_CTRLACK);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(smmu->dev, "failed to disable irqs\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + irq = smmu->combined_irq;
> + if (irq) {
> + /*
> + * Cavium ThunderX2 implementation doesn't not support unique
> + * irq lines. Use single irq line for all the SMMUv3 interrupts.
> + */
> + ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(smmu->dev, irq,
> + arm_smmu_combined_irq_handler,
> + arm_smmu_combined_irq_thread,
> + IRQF_ONESHOT,

Without the IRQF_SHARED flag set I see the following on a dual node
system now:

[ 17.403260] arm-smmu-v3 arm-smmu-v3.0.auto: option mask 0x2
[ 17.408853] arm-smmu-v3 arm-smmu-v3.0.auto: ias 44-bit, oas 44-bit (features 0x0000172d)
[ 17.417259] arm-smmu-v3 arm-smmu-v3.1.auto: option mask 0x2
[ 17.422856] arm-smmu-v3 arm-smmu-v3.1.auto: ias 44-bit, oas 44-bit (features 0x0000172d)
[ 17.431193] arm-smmu-v3 arm-smmu-v3.2.auto: option mask 0x2
[ 17.436787] arm-smmu-v3 arm-smmu-v3.2.auto: ias 44-bit, oas 44-bit (features 0x0000172d)
[ 17.445123] arm-smmu-v3 arm-smmu-v3.3.auto: option mask 0x2
[ 17.450697] arm-smmu-v3 arm-smmu-v3.3.auto: ias 44-bit, oas 44-bit (features 0x0000172d)
[ 17.458984] genirq: Flags mismatch irq 5. 00002001 (arm-smmu-v3-combined-irq) vs. 00002001 (arm-smmu-v3-combined-irq)
[ 17.610636] arm-smmu-v3 arm-smmu-v3.3.auto: failed to enable combined irq
[ 17.617491] arm-smmu-v3 arm-smmu-v3.4.auto: option mask 0x2
[ 17.623073] arm-smmu-v3 arm-smmu-v3.4.auto: ias 44-bit, oas 44-bit (features 0x0000172d)
[ 17.631339] genirq: Flags mismatch irq 6. 00002001 (arm-smmu-v3-combined-irq) vs. 00002001 (arm-smmu-v3-combined-irq)
[ 17.782944] arm-smmu-v3 arm-smmu-v3.4.auto: failed to enable combined irq
[ 17.789780] arm-smmu-v3 arm-smmu-v3.5.auto: option mask 0x2
[ 17.795367] arm-smmu-v3 arm-smmu-v3.5.auto: ias 44-bit, oas 44-bit (features 0x0000172d)
[ 17.803640] genirq: Flags mismatch irq 7. 00002001 (arm-smmu-v3-combined-irq) vs. 00002001 (arm-smmu-v3-combined-irq)
[ 17.955248] arm-smmu-v3 arm-smmu-v3.5.auto: failed to enable combined irq

In __setup_irq() in kernel/irq/manage.c there is a check if that flag
is set which causes the error is shown.

-Robert

> + "arm-smmu-v3-combined-irq", smmu);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + dev_warn(smmu->dev, "failed to enable combined irq\n");
> + } else
> + arm_smmu_setup_unique_irqs(smmu);
> +
> + if (smmu->features & ARM_SMMU_FEAT_PRI)
> + irqen_flags |= IRQ_CTRL_PRIQ_IRQEN;
>
> /* Enable interrupt generation on the SMMU */
> ret = arm_smmu_write_reg_sync(smmu, irqen_flags,

2017-06-27 14:06:10

by Will Deacon

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [Devel] [RESEND PATCH v9 3/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add workaround for Cavium ThunderX2 erratum #126

On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 03:56:10PM +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
> On 23.06.17 19:04:36, Geetha sowjanya wrote:
> > From: Geetha Sowjanya <[email protected]>
> >
> > Cavium ThunderX2 SMMU doesn't support MSI and also doesn't have unique irq
> > lines for gerror, eventq and cmdq-sync.
> >
> > New named irq "combined" is set as a errata workaround, which allows to
> > share the irq line by register single irq handler for all the interrupts.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Geetha sowjanya <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.txt | 1 +
> > .../devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu-v3.txt | 6 +
> > drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 57 ++++++++---
> > drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 100 ++++++++++++++-----
> > 4 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>
> > +static int arm_smmu_setup_irqs(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> > +{
> > + int ret, irq;
> > + u32 irqen_flags = IRQ_CTRL_EVTQ_IRQEN | IRQ_CTRL_GERROR_IRQEN;
> > +
> > + /* Disable IRQs first */
> > + ret = arm_smmu_write_reg_sync(smmu, 0, ARM_SMMU_IRQ_CTRL,
> > + ARM_SMMU_IRQ_CTRLACK);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + dev_err(smmu->dev, "failed to disable irqs\n");
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > + irq = smmu->combined_irq;
> > + if (irq) {
> > + /*
> > + * Cavium ThunderX2 implementation doesn't not support unique
> > + * irq lines. Use single irq line for all the SMMUv3 interrupts.
> > + */
> > + ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(smmu->dev, irq,
> > + arm_smmu_combined_irq_handler,
> > + arm_smmu_combined_irq_thread,
> > + IRQF_ONESHOT,
>
> Without the IRQF_SHARED flag set I see the following on a dual node
> system now:

We asked about that before:

https://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=149803613513068&w=2
https://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=149803744713475&w=2

and Geetha didn't reply, but the next version of the patch dropped the flag.
Is it just that firmware is misprogramming something here, or something
more fundamental?

Will

2017-06-27 15:02:13

by Geetha Akula

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [Devel] [RESEND PATCH v9 3/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add workaround for Cavium ThunderX2 erratum #126

On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 7:36 PM, Will Deacon <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 03:56:10PM +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
>> On 23.06.17 19:04:36, Geetha sowjanya wrote:
>> > From: Geetha Sowjanya <[email protected]>
>> >
>> > Cavium ThunderX2 SMMU doesn't support MSI and also doesn't have unique irq
>> > lines for gerror, eventq and cmdq-sync.
>> >
>> > New named irq "combined" is set as a errata workaround, which allows to
>> > share the irq line by register single irq handler for all the interrupts.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Geetha sowjanya <[email protected]>
>> > ---
>> > Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.txt | 1 +
>> > .../devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu-v3.txt | 6 +
>> > drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 57 ++++++++---
>> > drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 100 ++++++++++++++-----
>> > 4 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>>
>> > +static int arm_smmu_setup_irqs(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
>> > +{
>> > + int ret, irq;
>> > + u32 irqen_flags = IRQ_CTRL_EVTQ_IRQEN | IRQ_CTRL_GERROR_IRQEN;
>> > +
>> > + /* Disable IRQs first */
>> > + ret = arm_smmu_write_reg_sync(smmu, 0, ARM_SMMU_IRQ_CTRL,
>> > + ARM_SMMU_IRQ_CTRLACK);
>> > + if (ret) {
>> > + dev_err(smmu->dev, "failed to disable irqs\n");
>> > + return ret;
>> > + }
>> > +
>> > + irq = smmu->combined_irq;
>> > + if (irq) {
>> > + /*
>> > + * Cavium ThunderX2 implementation doesn't not support unique
>> > + * irq lines. Use single irq line for all the SMMUv3 interrupts.
>> > + */
>> > + ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(smmu->dev, irq,
>> > + arm_smmu_combined_irq_handler,
>> > + arm_smmu_combined_irq_thread,
>> > + IRQF_ONESHOT,
>>
>> Without the IRQF_SHARED flag set I see the following on a dual node
>> system now:
Node1 SMMU interrupts are programmed wrong in the firmware.
Node 0 and Node1 SMMU do not share interrupts.
I have verified the patch on dual node with correct interrupt numbers
programmed in firmware.


Thanks,
Geetha.
>
> We asked about that before:
>
> https://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=149803613513068&w=2
> https://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=149803744713475&w=2
>
> and Geetha didn't reply, but the next version of the patch dropped the flag.
> Is it just that firmware is misprogramming something here, or something
> more fundamental?
>
> Will

2017-06-27 15:26:08

by Richter, Robert

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [Devel] [RESEND PATCH v9 3/3] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add workaround for Cavium ThunderX2 erratum #126

On 27.06.17 20:28:14, Geetha Akula wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 7:36 PM, Will Deacon <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 03:56:10PM +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
> >> On 23.06.17 19:04:36, Geetha sowjanya wrote:
> >> > From: Geetha Sowjanya <[email protected]>
> >> >
> >> > Cavium ThunderX2 SMMU doesn't support MSI and also doesn't have unique irq
> >> > lines for gerror, eventq and cmdq-sync.
> >> >
> >> > New named irq "combined" is set as a errata workaround, which allows to
> >> > share the irq line by register single irq handler for all the interrupts.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Geetha sowjanya <[email protected]>
> >> > ---
> >> > Documentation/arm64/silicon-errata.txt | 1 +
> >> > .../devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu-v3.txt | 6 +
> >> > drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 57 ++++++++---
> >> > drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 100 ++++++++++++++-----
> >> > 4 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> > +static int arm_smmu_setup_irqs(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> >> > +{
> >> > + int ret, irq;
> >> > + u32 irqen_flags = IRQ_CTRL_EVTQ_IRQEN | IRQ_CTRL_GERROR_IRQEN;
> >> > +
> >> > + /* Disable IRQs first */
> >> > + ret = arm_smmu_write_reg_sync(smmu, 0, ARM_SMMU_IRQ_CTRL,
> >> > + ARM_SMMU_IRQ_CTRLACK);
> >> > + if (ret) {
> >> > + dev_err(smmu->dev, "failed to disable irqs\n");
> >> > + return ret;
> >> > + }
> >> > +
> >> > + irq = smmu->combined_irq;
> >> > + if (irq) {
> >> > + /*
> >> > + * Cavium ThunderX2 implementation doesn't not support unique
> >> > + * irq lines. Use single irq line for all the SMMUv3 interrupts.
> >> > + */
> >> > + ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(smmu->dev, irq,
> >> > + arm_smmu_combined_irq_handler,
> >> > + arm_smmu_combined_irq_thread,
> >> > + IRQF_ONESHOT,
> >>
> >> Without the IRQF_SHARED flag set I see the following on a dual node
> >> system now:
> Node1 SMMU interrupts are programmed wrong in the firmware.
> Node 0 and Node1 SMMU do not share interrupts.
> I have verified the patch on dual node with correct interrupt numbers
> programmed in firmware.

Ah, ok, will update to latest fw.

Thanks,

-Robert