Making cmd_getticks 'const' introduced a couple of harmless warnings:
drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c: In function 'probe_itpm':
drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c:469:31: error: passing argument 2 of 'tpm_tis_send_data' discards 'const' qualifier from pointer target type [-Werror=discarded-qualifiers]
rc = tpm_tis_send_data(chip, cmd_getticks, len);
drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c:477:31: error: passing argument 2 of 'tpm_tis_send_data' discards 'const' qualifier from pointer target type [-Werror=discarded-qualifiers]
rc = tpm_tis_send_data(chip, cmd_getticks, len);
drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c:255:12: note: expected 'u8 * {aka unsigned char *}' but argument is of type 'const u8 * {aka const unsigned char *}'
static int tpm_tis_send_data(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t len)
This changes the related functions to all take 'const' pointers
so that gcc can see this as being correct. I had to slightly
modify the logic around tpm_tis_spi_transfer() for this to work
without introducing ugly casts.
Fixes: 5e35bd8e06b9 ("tpm_tis: make array cmd_getticks static const to shink object code size")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
---
drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c | 2 +-
drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c | 4 ++--
drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.h | 4 ++--
drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi.c | 25 +++++++++++--------------
4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c
index 7e55aa9ce680..ebd0e75a3e4d 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c
@@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ static int tpm_tcg_read_bytes(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr, u16 len,
}
static int tpm_tcg_write_bytes(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr, u16 len,
- u8 *value)
+ const u8 *value)
{
struct tpm_tis_tcg_phy *phy = to_tpm_tis_tcg_phy(data);
diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
index 1e957e923d21..fdde971bc810 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ static int tpm_tis_recv(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count)
* tpm.c can skip polling for the data to be available as the interrupt is
* waited for here
*/
-static int tpm_tis_send_data(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t len)
+static int tpm_tis_send_data(struct tpm_chip *chip, const u8 *buf, size_t len)
{
struct tpm_tis_data *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev);
int rc, status, burstcnt;
@@ -343,7 +343,7 @@ static void disable_interrupts(struct tpm_chip *chip)
* tpm.c can skip polling for the data to be available as the interrupt is
* waited for here
*/
-static int tpm_tis_send_main(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t len)
+static int tpm_tis_send_main(struct tpm_chip *chip, const u8 *buf, size_t len)
{
struct tpm_tis_data *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev);
int rc;
diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.h b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.h
index e2212f021a02..6bbac319ff3b 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.h
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.h
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ struct tpm_tis_phy_ops {
int (*read_bytes)(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr, u16 len,
u8 *result);
int (*write_bytes)(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr, u16 len,
- u8 *value);
+ const u8 *value);
int (*read16)(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr, u16 *result);
int (*read32)(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr, u32 *result);
int (*write32)(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr, u32 src);
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ static inline int tpm_tis_read32(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr,
}
static inline int tpm_tis_write_bytes(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr,
- u16 len, u8 *value)
+ u16 len, const u8 *value)
{
return data->phy_ops->write_bytes(data, addr, len, value);
}
diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi.c
index 88fe72ae967f..e49f5b9b739a 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi.c
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ static inline struct tpm_tis_spi_phy *to_tpm_tis_spi_phy(struct tpm_tis_data *da
}
static int tpm_tis_spi_transfer(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr, u16 len,
- u8 *buffer, u8 direction)
+ u8 *in, const u8 *out)
{
struct tpm_tis_spi_phy *phy = to_tpm_tis_spi_phy(data);
int ret = 0;
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ static int tpm_tis_spi_transfer(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr, u16 len,
while (len) {
transfer_len = min_t(u16, len, MAX_SPI_FRAMESIZE);
- phy->tx_buf[0] = direction | (transfer_len - 1);
+ phy->tx_buf[0] = (in ? 0x80 : 0) | (transfer_len - 1);
phy->tx_buf[1] = 0xd4;
phy->tx_buf[2] = addr >> 8;
phy->tx_buf[3] = addr;
@@ -112,14 +112,8 @@ static int tpm_tis_spi_transfer(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr, u16 len,
spi_xfer.cs_change = 0;
spi_xfer.len = transfer_len;
spi_xfer.delay_usecs = 5;
-
- if (direction) {
- spi_xfer.tx_buf = NULL;
- spi_xfer.rx_buf = buffer;
- } else {
- spi_xfer.tx_buf = buffer;
- spi_xfer.rx_buf = NULL;
- }
+ spi_xfer.tx_buf = out;
+ spi_xfer.rx_buf = in;
spi_message_init(&m);
spi_message_add_tail(&spi_xfer, &m);
@@ -128,7 +122,10 @@ static int tpm_tis_spi_transfer(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr, u16 len,
goto exit;
len -= transfer_len;
- buffer += transfer_len;
+ if (in)
+ in += transfer_len;
+ if (out)
+ out += transfer_len;
}
exit:
@@ -139,13 +136,13 @@ static int tpm_tis_spi_transfer(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr, u16 len,
static int tpm_tis_spi_read_bytes(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr,
u16 len, u8 *result)
{
- return tpm_tis_spi_transfer(data, addr, len, result, 0x80);
+ return tpm_tis_spi_transfer(data, addr, len, result, NULL);
}
static int tpm_tis_spi_write_bytes(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr,
- u16 len, u8 *value)
+ u16 len, const u8 *value)
{
- return tpm_tis_spi_transfer(data, addr, len, value, 0);
+ return tpm_tis_spi_transfer(data, addr, len, NULL, value);
}
static int tpm_tis_spi_read16(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr, u16 *result)
--
2.9.0
On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 03:30:45PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Making cmd_getticks 'const' introduced a couple of harmless warnings:
>
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c: In function 'probe_itpm':
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c:469:31: error: passing argument 2 of 'tpm_tis_send_data' discards 'const' qualifier from pointer target type [-Werror=discarded-qualifiers]
> rc = tpm_tis_send_data(chip, cmd_getticks, len);
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c:477:31: error: passing argument 2 of 'tpm_tis_send_data' discards 'const' qualifier from pointer target type [-Werror=discarded-qualifiers]
> rc = tpm_tis_send_data(chip, cmd_getticks, len);
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c:255:12: note: expected 'u8 * {aka unsigned char *}' but argument is of type 'const u8 * {aka const unsigned char *}'
> static int tpm_tis_send_data(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t len)
>
> This changes the related functions to all take 'const' pointers
> so that gcc can see this as being correct. I had to slightly
> modify the logic around tpm_tis_spi_transfer() for this to work
> without introducing ugly casts.
>
> Fixes: 5e35bd8e06b9 ("tpm_tis: make array cmd_getticks static const to shink object code size")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c | 2 +-
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.h | 4 ++--
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi.c | 25 +++++++++++--------------
> 4 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c
> index 7e55aa9ce680..ebd0e75a3e4d 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis.c
> @@ -223,7 +223,7 @@ static int tpm_tcg_read_bytes(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr, u16 len,
> }
>
> static int tpm_tcg_write_bytes(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr, u16 len,
> - u8 *value)
> + const u8 *value)
> {
> struct tpm_tis_tcg_phy *phy = to_tpm_tis_tcg_phy(data);
>
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> index 1e957e923d21..fdde971bc810 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> @@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ static int tpm_tis_recv(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t count)
> * tpm.c can skip polling for the data to be available as the interrupt is
> * waited for here
> */
> -static int tpm_tis_send_data(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t len)
> +static int tpm_tis_send_data(struct tpm_chip *chip, const u8 *buf, size_t len)
> {
> struct tpm_tis_data *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev);
> int rc, status, burstcnt;
> @@ -343,7 +343,7 @@ static void disable_interrupts(struct tpm_chip *chip)
> * tpm.c can skip polling for the data to be available as the interrupt is
> * waited for here
> */
> -static int tpm_tis_send_main(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t len)
> +static int tpm_tis_send_main(struct tpm_chip *chip, const u8 *buf, size_t len)
> {
> struct tpm_tis_data *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&chip->dev);
> int rc;
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.h b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.h
> index e2212f021a02..6bbac319ff3b 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.h
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.h
> @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ struct tpm_tis_phy_ops {
> int (*read_bytes)(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr, u16 len,
> u8 *result);
> int (*write_bytes)(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr, u16 len,
> - u8 *value);
> + const u8 *value);
> int (*read16)(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr, u16 *result);
> int (*read32)(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr, u32 *result);
> int (*write32)(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr, u32 src);
> @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ static inline int tpm_tis_read32(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr,
> }
>
> static inline int tpm_tis_write_bytes(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr,
> - u16 len, u8 *value)
> + u16 len, const u8 *value)
> {
> return data->phy_ops->write_bytes(data, addr, len, value);
> }
> diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi.c
> index 88fe72ae967f..e49f5b9b739a 100644
> --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi.c
> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi.c
> @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ static inline struct tpm_tis_spi_phy *to_tpm_tis_spi_phy(struct tpm_tis_data *da
> }
>
> static int tpm_tis_spi_transfer(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr, u16 len,
> - u8 *buffer, u8 direction)
> + u8 *in, const u8 *out)
> {
> struct tpm_tis_spi_phy *phy = to_tpm_tis_spi_phy(data);
> int ret = 0;
> @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ static int tpm_tis_spi_transfer(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr, u16 len,
> while (len) {
> transfer_len = min_t(u16, len, MAX_SPI_FRAMESIZE);
>
> - phy->tx_buf[0] = direction | (transfer_len - 1);
> + phy->tx_buf[0] = (in ? 0x80 : 0) | (transfer_len - 1);
> phy->tx_buf[1] = 0xd4;
> phy->tx_buf[2] = addr >> 8;
> phy->tx_buf[3] = addr;
> @@ -112,14 +112,8 @@ static int tpm_tis_spi_transfer(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr, u16 len,
> spi_xfer.cs_change = 0;
> spi_xfer.len = transfer_len;
> spi_xfer.delay_usecs = 5;
> -
> - if (direction) {
> - spi_xfer.tx_buf = NULL;
> - spi_xfer.rx_buf = buffer;
> - } else {
> - spi_xfer.tx_buf = buffer;
> - spi_xfer.rx_buf = NULL;
> - }
> + spi_xfer.tx_buf = out;
> + spi_xfer.rx_buf = in;
>
> spi_message_init(&m);
> spi_message_add_tail(&spi_xfer, &m);
> @@ -128,7 +122,10 @@ static int tpm_tis_spi_transfer(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr, u16 len,
> goto exit;
>
> len -= transfer_len;
> - buffer += transfer_len;
> + if (in)
> + in += transfer_len;
> + if (out)
> + out += transfer_len;
> }
>
> exit:
> @@ -139,13 +136,13 @@ static int tpm_tis_spi_transfer(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr, u16 len,
> static int tpm_tis_spi_read_bytes(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr,
> u16 len, u8 *result)
> {
> - return tpm_tis_spi_transfer(data, addr, len, result, 0x80);
> + return tpm_tis_spi_transfer(data, addr, len, result, NULL);
> }
>
> static int tpm_tis_spi_write_bytes(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr,
> - u16 len, u8 *value)
> + u16 len, const u8 *value)
> {
> - return tpm_tis_spi_transfer(data, addr, len, value, 0);
> + return tpm_tis_spi_transfer(data, addr, len, NULL, value);
> }
>
> static int tpm_tis_spi_read16(struct tpm_tis_data *data, u32 addr, u16 *result)
> --
> 2.9.0
>
Thank you Arnd. Do you mind if squash this to Colin's commit and your
signed-off-by to that one?
/Jarkko
On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 03:30:45PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Making cmd_getticks 'const' introduced a couple of harmless warnings:
>
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c: In function 'probe_itpm':
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c:469:31: error: passing argument 2 of 'tpm_tis_send_data' discards 'const' qualifier from pointer target type [-Werror=discarded-qualifiers]
> rc = tpm_tis_send_data(chip, cmd_getticks, len);
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c:477:31: error: passing argument 2 of 'tpm_tis_send_data' discards 'const' qualifier from pointer target type [-Werror=discarded-qualifiers]
> rc = tpm_tis_send_data(chip, cmd_getticks, len);
> drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c:255:12: note: expected 'u8 * {aka unsigned char *}' but argument is of type 'const u8 * {aka const unsigned char *}'
> static int tpm_tis_send_data(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t len)
>
> This changes the related functions to all take 'const' pointers
> so that gcc can see this as being correct. I had to slightly
> modify the logic around tpm_tis_spi_transfer() for this to work
> without introducing ugly casts.
>
> Fixes: 5e35bd8e06b9 ("tpm_tis: make array cmd_getticks static const to shink object code size")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]>
Bit confused how the compile warnings introduced by the original patch
were missed?? Jarkko do you run compile tests and sparse before
sending pull requests?
Cheers,
Jason
On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 6:24 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen
<[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 03:30:45PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>
>
> Thank you Arnd. Do you mind if squash this to Colin's commit and your
> signed-off-by to that one?
Either way works, but if you merge the two commits into one, please
clarify in the description who did what part, otherwise it might look like
I just forwarded Jason's original patch to you.
Arnd
On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 02:01:53PM -0600, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 03:30:45PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > Making cmd_getticks 'const' introduced a couple of harmless warnings:
> >
> > drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c: In function 'probe_itpm':
> > drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c:469:31: error: passing argument 2 of 'tpm_tis_send_data' discards 'const' qualifier from pointer target type [-Werror=discarded-qualifiers]
> > rc = tpm_tis_send_data(chip, cmd_getticks, len);
> > drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c:477:31: error: passing argument 2 of 'tpm_tis_send_data' discards 'const' qualifier from pointer target type [-Werror=discarded-qualifiers]
> > rc = tpm_tis_send_data(chip, cmd_getticks, len);
> > drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c:255:12: note: expected 'u8 * {aka unsigned char *}' but argument is of type 'const u8 * {aka const unsigned char *}'
> > static int tpm_tis_send_data(struct tpm_chip *chip, u8 *buf, size_t len)
> >
> > This changes the related functions to all take 'const' pointers
> > so that gcc can see this as being correct. I had to slightly
> > modify the logic around tpm_tis_spi_transfer() for this to work
> > without introducing ugly casts.
> >
> > Fixes: 5e35bd8e06b9 ("tpm_tis: make array cmd_getticks static const to shink object code size")
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
>
> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <[email protected]>
>
> Bit confused how the compile warnings introduced by the original patch
> were missed?? Jarkko do you run compile tests and sparse before
> sending pull requests?
>
> Cheers,
> Jason
Yes, I do. This has not been part of any pull request so I fail to
understand why you bring them up?
I did run compile tests but managed somehow miss the warning. Sorry
about that but something like this has happened rarely. I can only
blame ridiculous amount of multitasking in last couple of weeks.
/Jarkko
On Fri, Sep 08, 2017 at 10:58:55PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 6:24 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 07, 2017 at 03:30:45PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >>
> >
> > Thank you Arnd. Do you mind if squash this to Colin's commit and your
> > signed-off-by to that one?
>
> Either way works, but if you merge the two commits into one, please
> clarify in the description who did what part, otherwise it might look like
> I just forwarded Jason's original patch to you.
>
> Arnd
I think it could be also a separate patch just to in order to make
that simple and also to retain information for git blame. Thanks.
/Jarkko