This patch removes unnecessary comments which are there
to explain why call to memset is in comments. Both of the
comments are not needed as they are not very useful.
Signed-off-by: Shreeya Patel <[email protected]>
---
Changes in v2:
-Remove some more unnecessary comments and make the
commit message more appropriate.
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme.c | 3 ---
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c | 3 ---
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_pwrctrl.c | 2 --
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_recv.c | 4 ----
drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_xmit.c | 3 ---
5 files changed, 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme.c
index 6b77820..5b583f7 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme.c
@@ -28,9 +28,6 @@ sint _rtw_init_mlme_priv(struct adapter *padapter)
struct mlme_priv *pmlmepriv = &padapter->mlmepriv;
sint res = _SUCCESS;
- /* We don't need to memset padapter->XXX to zero, because adapter is allocated by vzalloc(). */
- /* memset((u8 *)pmlmepriv, 0, sizeof(struct mlme_priv)); */
-
pmlmepriv->nic_hdl = (u8 *)padapter;
pmlmepriv->pscanned = NULL;
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
index b6d137f..ca35c1c 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_mlme_ext.c
@@ -474,9 +474,6 @@ int init_mlme_ext_priv(struct adapter *padapter)
struct mlme_priv *pmlmepriv = &(padapter->mlmepriv);
struct mlme_ext_info *pmlmeinfo = &(pmlmeext->mlmext_info);
- /* We don't need to memset padapter->XXX to zero, because adapter is allocated by vzalloc(). */
- /* memset((u8 *)pmlmeext, 0, sizeof(struct mlme_ext_priv)); */
-
pmlmeext->padapter = padapter;
/* fill_fwpriv(padapter, &(pmlmeext->fwpriv)); */
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_pwrctrl.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_pwrctrl.c
index aabdaaf..820a061 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_pwrctrl.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_pwrctrl.c
@@ -1193,8 +1193,6 @@ void rtw_init_pwrctrl_priv(struct adapter *padapter)
void rtw_free_pwrctrl_priv(struct adapter *adapter)
{
- /* memset((unsigned char *)pwrctrlpriv, 0, sizeof(struct pwrctrl_priv)); */
-
#ifdef CONFIG_PNO_SUPPORT
if (pwrctrlpriv->pnlo_info != NULL)
printk("****** pnlo_info memory leak********\n");
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_recv.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_recv.c
index 68a6303..73e6e41 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_recv.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_recv.c
@@ -46,9 +46,6 @@ sint _rtw_init_recv_priv(struct recv_priv *precvpriv, struct adapter *padapter)
union recv_frame *precvframe;
sint res = _SUCCESS;
- /* We don't need to memset padapter->XXX to zero, because adapter is allocated by vzalloc(). */
- /* memset((unsigned char *)precvpriv, 0, sizeof (struct recv_priv)); */
-
spin_lock_init(&precvpriv->lock);
_rtw_init_queue(&precvpriv->free_recv_queue);
@@ -65,7 +62,6 @@ sint _rtw_init_recv_priv(struct recv_priv *precvpriv, struct adapter *padapter)
res = _FAIL;
goto exit;
}
- /* memset(precvpriv->pallocated_frame_buf, 0, NR_RECVFRAME * sizeof(union recv_frame) + RXFRAME_ALIGN_SZ); */
precvpriv->precv_frame_buf = (u8 *)N_BYTE_ALIGMENT((SIZE_PTR)(precvpriv->pallocated_frame_buf), RXFRAME_ALIGN_SZ);
/* precvpriv->precv_frame_buf = precvpriv->pallocated_frame_buf + RXFRAME_ALIGN_SZ - */
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_xmit.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_xmit.c
index 022f654..8cd05f8 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_xmit.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8723bs/core/rtw_xmit.c
@@ -51,9 +51,6 @@ s32 _rtw_init_xmit_priv(struct xmit_priv *pxmitpriv, struct adapter *padapter)
struct xmit_frame *pxframe;
sint res = _SUCCESS;
- /* We don't need to memset padapter->XXX to zero, because adapter is allocated by vzalloc(). */
- /* memset((unsigned char *)pxmitpriv, 0, sizeof(struct xmit_priv)); */
-
spin_lock_init(&pxmitpriv->lock);
spin_lock_init(&pxmitpriv->lock_sctx);
sema_init(&pxmitpriv->xmit_sema, 0);
--
2.7.4
Hi Shreeya,
We don't usually add a period to the subject line for kernel patches. (reason: we only have about
52 characters for the commit brief description so best not to waste any).
On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 01:30:34PM +0530, Shreeya Patel wrote:
> This patch removes unnecessary comments which are there
> to explain why call to memset is in comments. Both of the
> comments are not needed as they are not very useful.
You may like to read Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst (specifically
section 2) for tips on writing your git log.
Describe your changes in imperative mood, e.g. "make xyzzy do frotz"
instead of "[This patch] makes xyzzy do frotz" or "[I] changed xyzzy
to do frotz", as if you are giving orders to the codebase to change
its behaviour.
Good luck,
Tobin.
On Sat, 2017-09-30 at 21:06 +1000, Tobin C. Harding wrote:
> Hi Shreeya,
>
> We don't usually add a period to the subject line for kernel patches.
> (reason: we only have about
> 52 characters for the commit brief description so best not to waste
> any).
>
> On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 01:30:34PM +0530, Shreeya Patel wrote:
> >
> > This patch removes unnecessary comments which are there
> > to explain why call to memset is in comments. Both of the
> > comments are not needed as they are not very useful.
> You may like to read Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
> (specifically
> section 2) for tips on writing your git log.
>
> Describe your changes in imperative mood, e.g. "make xyzzy do
> frotz"
> instead of "[This patch] makes xyzzy do frotz" or "[I]
> changed xyzzy
> to do frotz", as if you are giving orders to the codebase to
> change
> its behaviour.
>
> Good luck,
> Tobin.
Hello,
Thanks for correcting me :)
I'll do the necessary changes and will send as v3.