gcc-5.3 and earlier warns that rate_discrete maybe-uninitialized
../drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c:185:5: warning: 'rate_discrete'
may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
if (rate_discrete)
^
../drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c:128:7: note:
'rate_discrete' was declared here
bool rate_discrete;
^
Fixes: 5f6c6430e904 ("firmware: arm_scmi: add initial support for clock protocol")
Signed-off-by: Anders Roxell <[email protected]>
---
drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c
index e8ffad33a0ff..e6f17825db79 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ scmi_clock_describe_rates_get(const struct scmi_handle *handle, u32 clk_id,
{
u64 *rate;
int ret, cnt;
- bool rate_discrete;
+ bool rate_discrete = false;
u32 tot_rate_cnt = 0, rates_flag;
u16 num_returned, num_remaining;
struct scmi_xfer *t;
@@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ scmi_clock_describe_rates_get(const struct scmi_handle *handle, u32 clk_id,
ret = scmi_do_xfer(handle, t);
if (ret)
- break;
+ goto err;
rates_flag = le32_to_cpu(rlist->num_rates_flags);
num_remaining = NUM_REMAINING(rates_flag);
@@ -185,6 +185,7 @@ scmi_clock_describe_rates_get(const struct scmi_handle *handle, u32 clk_id,
if (rate_discrete)
clk->list.num_rates = tot_rate_cnt;
+err:
scmi_one_xfer_put(handle, t);
return ret;
}
--
2.11.0
Hi Anders,
On 16/03/18 11:44, Anders Roxell wrote:
> gcc-5.3 and earlier warns that rate_discrete maybe-uninitialized
> ../drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c:185:5: warning: 'rate_discrete'
> may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> if (rate_discrete)
> ^
> ../drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/clock.c:128:7: note:
> 'rate_discrete' was declared here
> bool rate_discrete;
> ^
>
Thanks for the fix, applied.
--
Regards,
Sudeep