Signed-off-by: Masatake YAMATO <[email protected]>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/iommu_table.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/iommu_table.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/iommu_table.h
index 1fb3fd1a83c2..2a0d5f7d1ed1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/iommu_table.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/iommu_table.h
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ struct iommu_table_entry {
#define IOMMU_INIT_POST(_detect) \
__IOMMU_INIT(_detect, pci_swiotlb_detect_4gb, NULL, NULL, 0)
-#define IOMMU_INIT_POST_FINISH(detect) \
+#define IOMMU_INIT_POST_FINISH(_detect) \
__IOMMU_INIT(_detect, pci_swiotlb_detect_4gb, NULL, NULL, 1)
/*
--
2.17.0
On Wed, 6 Jun 2018, Masatake YAMATO wrote:
Can you please explain why 0 is the wrong value. That's not a typo, that's
a functional change and both the subject line and the changelog itself
should be explanatory.
Thanks,
tglx
> Signed-off-by: Masatake YAMATO <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/iommu_table.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/iommu_table.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/iommu_table.h
> index 1fb3fd1a83c2..2a0d5f7d1ed1 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/iommu_table.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/iommu_table.h
> @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ struct iommu_table_entry {
> #define IOMMU_INIT_POST(_detect) \
> __IOMMU_INIT(_detect, pci_swiotlb_detect_4gb, NULL, NULL, 0)
>
> -#define IOMMU_INIT_POST_FINISH(detect) \
> +#define IOMMU_INIT_POST_FINISH(_detect) \
> __IOMMU_INIT(_detect, pci_swiotlb_detect_4gb, NULL, NULL, 1)
>
> /*
> --
> 2.17.0
>
>
On Wed, 6 Jun 2018 12:37:34 +0200 (CEST), Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Jun 2018, Masatake YAMATO wrote:
>
> Can you please explain why 0 is the wrong value.
I don't know such constants, 0 and 1.
What I change is just the name of macro parameter as
s/detect/_detect/
I don't change the definition of macro.
Masatake YAMATO
> That's not a typo, that's
> a functional change and both the subject line and the changelog itself
> should be explanatory.
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
>
>> Signed-off-by: Masatake YAMATO <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/include/asm/iommu_table.h | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/iommu_table.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/iommu_table.h
>> index 1fb3fd1a83c2..2a0d5f7d1ed1 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/iommu_table.h
>> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/iommu_table.h
>> @@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ struct iommu_table_entry {
>> #define IOMMU_INIT_POST(_detect) \
>> __IOMMU_INIT(_detect, pci_swiotlb_detect_4gb, NULL, NULL, 0)
>>
>> -#define IOMMU_INIT_POST_FINISH(detect) \
>> +#define IOMMU_INIT_POST_FINISH(_detect) \
>> __IOMMU_INIT(_detect, pci_swiotlb_detect_4gb, NULL, NULL, 1)
>>
>> /*
>> --
>> 2.17.0
>>
>>
On Wed, 6 Jun 2018, Masatake YAMATO wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Jun 2018 12:37:34 +0200 (CEST), Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 6 Jun 2018, Masatake YAMATO wrote:
> >
> > Can you please explain why 0 is the wrong value.
>
> I don't know such constants, 0 and 1.
>
> What I change is just the name of macro parameter as
>
> s/detect/_detect/
OOps. Misread the patch. Sorry.
On Wed, 6 Jun 2018, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Jun 2018, Masatake YAMATO wrote:
> > On Wed, 6 Jun 2018 12:37:34 +0200 (CEST), Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Wed, 6 Jun 2018, Masatake YAMATO wrote:
> > >
> > > Can you please explain why 0 is the wrong value.
> >
> > I don't know such constants, 0 and 1.
> >
> > What I change is just the name of macro parameter as
> >
> > s/detect/_detect/
>
> OOps. Misread the patch. Sorry.
But the fix is pretty pointless. IOMMU_INIT_POST_FINISH() is completely
unused and should just be removed.
Thanks,
tglx
On Wed, 6 Jun 2018 14:41:57 +0200 (CEST), Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Jun 2018, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> On Wed, 6 Jun 2018, Masatake YAMATO wrote:
>> > On Wed, 6 Jun 2018 12:37:34 +0200 (CEST), Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > > On Wed, 6 Jun 2018, Masatake YAMATO wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Can you please explain why 0 is the wrong value.
>> >
>> > I don't know such constants, 0 and 1.
>> >
>> > What I change is just the name of macro parameter as
>> >
>> > s/detect/_detect/
>>
>> OOps. Misread the patch. Sorry.
>
> But the fix is pretty pointless. IOMMU_INIT_POST_FINISH() is completely
> unused and should just be removed.
Oh, I see. Thank you for taking your time.
Masatake YAMATO
> Thanks,
>
> tglx