Fixed a coding style issue
Signed-off-by: Sohil Ladhani <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c
index f4cae2be0fda..e4754f336c34 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/realtek/r8169.c
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@
#define assert(expr) \
if (!(expr)) { \
printk( "Assertion failed! %s,%s,%s,line=%d\n", \
- #expr,__FILE__,__func__,__LINE__); \
+ #expr, __FILE__, __func__, __LINE__); \
}
#define dprintk(fmt, args...) \
do { printk(KERN_DEBUG PFX fmt, ## args); } while (0)
--
2.18.0
From: Sohil Ladhani <[email protected]>
Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2018 14:32:21 +0530
> Fixed a coding style issue
>
> Signed-off-by: Sohil Ladhani <[email protected]>
This doesn't apply to the current net-next tree.
Hi David. Thanks for your inputs. I'm a kernel newbie and was just
following Greg's FOSDEM talk to submit my first patch. Will submit
further patches to net-next tree.
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 1:47 AM, David Miller <[email protected]> wrote:
> From: Sohil Ladhani <[email protected]>
> Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2018 14:32:21 +0530
>
>> Fixed a coding style issue
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sohil Ladhani <[email protected]>
>
> This doesn't apply to the current net-next tree.