2019-01-14 10:35:39

by Xin Long

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH net] sctp: allocate sctp_sockaddr_entry with kzalloc

The similar issue as fixed in Commit 4a2eb0c37b47 ("sctp: initialize
sin6_flowinfo for ipv6 addrs in sctp_inet6addr_event") also exists
in sctp_inetaddr_event, as Alexander noticed.

To fix it, allocate sctp_sockaddr_entry with kzalloc for both sctp
ipv4 and ipv6 addresses, as does in sctp_v4/6_copy_addrlist().

Reported-by: Alexander Potapenko <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Xin Long <[email protected]>
---
net/sctp/ipv6.c | 5 +----
net/sctp/protocol.c | 4 +---
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/sctp/ipv6.c b/net/sctp/ipv6.c
index b9ed271..ed8e006 100644
--- a/net/sctp/ipv6.c
+++ b/net/sctp/ipv6.c
@@ -97,11 +97,9 @@ static int sctp_inet6addr_event(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long ev,

switch (ev) {
case NETDEV_UP:
- addr = kmalloc(sizeof(struct sctp_sockaddr_entry), GFP_ATOMIC);
+ addr = kzalloc(sizeof(*addr), GFP_ATOMIC);
if (addr) {
addr->a.v6.sin6_family = AF_INET6;
- addr->a.v6.sin6_port = 0;
- addr->a.v6.sin6_flowinfo = 0;
addr->a.v6.sin6_addr = ifa->addr;
addr->a.v6.sin6_scope_id = ifa->idev->dev->ifindex;
addr->valid = 1;
@@ -434,7 +432,6 @@ static void sctp_v6_copy_addrlist(struct list_head *addrlist,
addr = kzalloc(sizeof(*addr), GFP_ATOMIC);
if (addr) {
addr->a.v6.sin6_family = AF_INET6;
- addr->a.v6.sin6_port = 0;
addr->a.v6.sin6_addr = ifp->addr;
addr->a.v6.sin6_scope_id = dev->ifindex;
addr->valid = 1;
diff --git a/net/sctp/protocol.c b/net/sctp/protocol.c
index d5878ae..4e0eeb1 100644
--- a/net/sctp/protocol.c
+++ b/net/sctp/protocol.c
@@ -101,7 +101,6 @@ static void sctp_v4_copy_addrlist(struct list_head *addrlist,
addr = kzalloc(sizeof(*addr), GFP_ATOMIC);
if (addr) {
addr->a.v4.sin_family = AF_INET;
- addr->a.v4.sin_port = 0;
addr->a.v4.sin_addr.s_addr = ifa->ifa_local;
addr->valid = 1;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&addr->list);
@@ -776,10 +775,9 @@ static int sctp_inetaddr_event(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long ev,

switch (ev) {
case NETDEV_UP:
- addr = kmalloc(sizeof(struct sctp_sockaddr_entry), GFP_ATOMIC);
+ addr = kzalloc(sizeof(*addr), GFP_ATOMIC);
if (addr) {
addr->a.v4.sin_family = AF_INET;
- addr->a.v4.sin_port = 0;
addr->a.v4.sin_addr.s_addr = ifa->ifa_local;
addr->valid = 1;
spin_lock_bh(&net->sctp.local_addr_lock);
--
2.1.0



2019-01-14 13:12:29

by Marcelo Ricardo Leitner

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] sctp: allocate sctp_sockaddr_entry with kzalloc

On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 06:34:02PM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
> The similar issue as fixed in Commit 4a2eb0c37b47 ("sctp: initialize
> sin6_flowinfo for ipv6 addrs in sctp_inet6addr_event") also exists
> in sctp_inetaddr_event, as Alexander noticed.
>
> To fix it, allocate sctp_sockaddr_entry with kzalloc for both sctp
> ipv4 and ipv6 addresses, as does in sctp_v4/6_copy_addrlist().
>
> Reported-by: Alexander Potapenko <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Xin Long <[email protected]>

Seems you were faster than syzkaller, but we could still use:
Reported-by: [email protected]

Acked-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <[email protected]>

> ---
> net/sctp/ipv6.c | 5 +----
> net/sctp/protocol.c | 4 +---
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sctp/ipv6.c b/net/sctp/ipv6.c
> index b9ed271..ed8e006 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/ipv6.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/ipv6.c
> @@ -97,11 +97,9 @@ static int sctp_inet6addr_event(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long ev,
>
> switch (ev) {
> case NETDEV_UP:
> - addr = kmalloc(sizeof(struct sctp_sockaddr_entry), GFP_ATOMIC);
> + addr = kzalloc(sizeof(*addr), GFP_ATOMIC);
> if (addr) {
> addr->a.v6.sin6_family = AF_INET6;
> - addr->a.v6.sin6_port = 0;
> - addr->a.v6.sin6_flowinfo = 0;
> addr->a.v6.sin6_addr = ifa->addr;
> addr->a.v6.sin6_scope_id = ifa->idev->dev->ifindex;
> addr->valid = 1;
> @@ -434,7 +432,6 @@ static void sctp_v6_copy_addrlist(struct list_head *addrlist,
> addr = kzalloc(sizeof(*addr), GFP_ATOMIC);
> if (addr) {
> addr->a.v6.sin6_family = AF_INET6;
> - addr->a.v6.sin6_port = 0;
> addr->a.v6.sin6_addr = ifp->addr;
> addr->a.v6.sin6_scope_id = dev->ifindex;
> addr->valid = 1;
> diff --git a/net/sctp/protocol.c b/net/sctp/protocol.c
> index d5878ae..4e0eeb1 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/protocol.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/protocol.c
> @@ -101,7 +101,6 @@ static void sctp_v4_copy_addrlist(struct list_head *addrlist,
> addr = kzalloc(sizeof(*addr), GFP_ATOMIC);
> if (addr) {
> addr->a.v4.sin_family = AF_INET;
> - addr->a.v4.sin_port = 0;
> addr->a.v4.sin_addr.s_addr = ifa->ifa_local;
> addr->valid = 1;
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&addr->list);
> @@ -776,10 +775,9 @@ static int sctp_inetaddr_event(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long ev,
>
> switch (ev) {
> case NETDEV_UP:
> - addr = kmalloc(sizeof(struct sctp_sockaddr_entry), GFP_ATOMIC);
> + addr = kzalloc(sizeof(*addr), GFP_ATOMIC);
> if (addr) {
> addr->a.v4.sin_family = AF_INET;
> - addr->a.v4.sin_port = 0;
> addr->a.v4.sin_addr.s_addr = ifa->ifa_local;
> addr->valid = 1;
> spin_lock_bh(&net->sctp.local_addr_lock);
> --
> 2.1.0
>

2019-01-14 14:11:14

by Neil Horman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] sctp: allocate sctp_sockaddr_entry with kzalloc

On Mon, Jan 14, 2019 at 06:34:02PM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
> The similar issue as fixed in Commit 4a2eb0c37b47 ("sctp: initialize
> sin6_flowinfo for ipv6 addrs in sctp_inet6addr_event") also exists
> in sctp_inetaddr_event, as Alexander noticed.
>
> To fix it, allocate sctp_sockaddr_entry with kzalloc for both sctp
> ipv4 and ipv6 addresses, as does in sctp_v4/6_copy_addrlist().
>
> Reported-by: Alexander Potapenko <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Xin Long <[email protected]>
> ---
> net/sctp/ipv6.c | 5 +----
> net/sctp/protocol.c | 4 +---
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/sctp/ipv6.c b/net/sctp/ipv6.c
> index b9ed271..ed8e006 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/ipv6.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/ipv6.c
> @@ -97,11 +97,9 @@ static int sctp_inet6addr_event(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long ev,
>
> switch (ev) {
> case NETDEV_UP:
> - addr = kmalloc(sizeof(struct sctp_sockaddr_entry), GFP_ATOMIC);
> + addr = kzalloc(sizeof(*addr), GFP_ATOMIC);
> if (addr) {
> addr->a.v6.sin6_family = AF_INET6;
> - addr->a.v6.sin6_port = 0;
> - addr->a.v6.sin6_flowinfo = 0;
> addr->a.v6.sin6_addr = ifa->addr;
> addr->a.v6.sin6_scope_id = ifa->idev->dev->ifindex;
> addr->valid = 1;
> @@ -434,7 +432,6 @@ static void sctp_v6_copy_addrlist(struct list_head *addrlist,
> addr = kzalloc(sizeof(*addr), GFP_ATOMIC);
> if (addr) {
> addr->a.v6.sin6_family = AF_INET6;
> - addr->a.v6.sin6_port = 0;
> addr->a.v6.sin6_addr = ifp->addr;
> addr->a.v6.sin6_scope_id = dev->ifindex;
> addr->valid = 1;
> diff --git a/net/sctp/protocol.c b/net/sctp/protocol.c
> index d5878ae..4e0eeb1 100644
> --- a/net/sctp/protocol.c
> +++ b/net/sctp/protocol.c
> @@ -101,7 +101,6 @@ static void sctp_v4_copy_addrlist(struct list_head *addrlist,
> addr = kzalloc(sizeof(*addr), GFP_ATOMIC);
> if (addr) {
> addr->a.v4.sin_family = AF_INET;
> - addr->a.v4.sin_port = 0;
> addr->a.v4.sin_addr.s_addr = ifa->ifa_local;
> addr->valid = 1;
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&addr->list);
> @@ -776,10 +775,9 @@ static int sctp_inetaddr_event(struct notifier_block *this, unsigned long ev,
>
> switch (ev) {
> case NETDEV_UP:
> - addr = kmalloc(sizeof(struct sctp_sockaddr_entry), GFP_ATOMIC);
> + addr = kzalloc(sizeof(*addr), GFP_ATOMIC);
> if (addr) {
> addr->a.v4.sin_family = AF_INET;
> - addr->a.v4.sin_port = 0;
> addr->a.v4.sin_addr.s_addr = ifa->ifa_local;
> addr->valid = 1;
> spin_lock_bh(&net->sctp.local_addr_lock);
> --
> 2.1.0
>
>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <[email protected]>


2019-01-17 00:39:15

by David Miller

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] sctp: allocate sctp_sockaddr_entry with kzalloc

From: Xin Long <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 18:34:02 +0800

> The similar issue as fixed in Commit 4a2eb0c37b47 ("sctp: initialize
> sin6_flowinfo for ipv6 addrs in sctp_inet6addr_event") also exists
> in sctp_inetaddr_event, as Alexander noticed.
>
> To fix it, allocate sctp_sockaddr_entry with kzalloc for both sctp
> ipv4 and ipv6 addresses, as does in sctp_v4/6_copy_addrlist().
>
> Reported-by: Alexander Potapenko <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Xin Long <[email protected]>

Applied and queued up for -stable.