This set adds USB SS PHY support to Qualcomm's QCS404 SoC
The PHY is implemented using Synopsys' SS PHY IP
The code is losely based on Sriharsha Allenki's
<[email protected]> original implementation.
v2:
enable OTG mode detection
move vdd voltage levels to driver
use bulk_ control interfaces
ss-phy-bindings [1]
v3:
remove clk/regulator counters
vdd constrains in device tree
update error labels
fix get_optional vbus
allocate arrays statically
fix typos in bindings
v4:
dts:
make compatible tag more specific to the driver
define a connector node to contain the vbus regulator
fix the resets definition
fix example node
remove unused binding (qcom-dwc3-usb-phy)
connector: add optional property vbus-supply
driver:
vbus regulator is no longer optional
[1] ss-phy-binding discussion:
- qcom,dwc3-ss-usb-phy exist for a generic usb2/usb3 phy driver that
was never merged. Rather than trying to re-use these bindings I chose
to delete them for simplicity
Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz (4):
dt-bindings: phy: remove qcom-dwc3-usb-phy
dt-bindings: connector: Add vbus-supply property
dt-bindings: Add Qualcomm USB SuperSpeed PHY bindings
phy: qualcomm: usb: Add SuperSpeed PHY driver
.../bindings/connector/usb-connector.txt | 4 +
.../bindings/phy/qcom,snps-usb-ssphy.txt | 79 +++++
.../bindings/phy/qcom-dwc3-usb-phy.txt | 37 --
drivers/phy/qualcomm/Kconfig | 11 +
drivers/phy/qualcomm/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-usb-ss.c | 322 ++++++++++++++++++
6 files changed, 417 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,snps-usb-ssphy.txt
delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom-dwc3-usb-phy.txt
create mode 100644 drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-usb-ss.c
--
2.20.1
This binding is not used by any driver.
Signed-off-by: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <[email protected]>
---
.../bindings/phy/qcom-dwc3-usb-phy.txt | 37 -------------------
1 file changed, 37 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom-dwc3-usb-phy.txt
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom-dwc3-usb-phy.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom-dwc3-usb-phy.txt
deleted file mode 100644
index a1697c27aecd..000000000000
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom-dwc3-usb-phy.txt
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,37 +0,0 @@
-Qualcomm DWC3 HS AND SS PHY CONTROLLER
---------------------------------------
-
-DWC3 PHY nodes are defined to describe on-chip Synopsis Physical layer
-controllers. Each DWC3 PHY controller should have its own node.
-
-Required properties:
-- compatible: should contain one of the following:
- - "qcom,dwc3-hs-usb-phy" for High Speed Synopsis PHY controller
- - "qcom,dwc3-ss-usb-phy" for Super Speed Synopsis PHY controller
-- reg: offset and length of the DWC3 PHY controller register set
-- #phy-cells: must be zero
-- clocks: a list of phandles and clock-specifier pairs, one for each entry in
- clock-names.
-- clock-names: Should contain "ref" for the PHY reference clock
-
-Optional clocks:
- "xo" External reference clock
-
-Example:
- phy@100f8800 {
- compatible = "qcom,dwc3-hs-usb-phy";
- reg = <0x100f8800 0x30>;
- clocks = <&gcc USB30_0_UTMI_CLK>;
- clock-names = "ref";
- #phy-cells = <0>;
-
- };
-
- phy@100f8830 {
- compatible = "qcom,dwc3-ss-usb-phy";
- reg = <0x100f8830 0x30>;
- clocks = <&gcc USB30_0_MASTER_CLK>;
- clock-names = "ref";
- #phy-cells = <0>;
-
- };
--
2.20.1
Controls Qualcomm's SS phy 1.0.0 implemented in the QCS404 and some
other Qualcomm platforms.
Based on Sriharsha Allenki's <[email protected]> original code.
Signed-off-by: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <[email protected]>
---
drivers/phy/qualcomm/Kconfig | 11 +
drivers/phy/qualcomm/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-usb-ss.c | 322 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
3 files changed, 334 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-usb-ss.c
diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/Kconfig b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/Kconfig
index 32f7d34eb784..a8dc550d25fb 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/Kconfig
@@ -82,3 +82,14 @@ config PHY_QCOM_USB_HSIC
select GENERIC_PHY
help
Support for the USB HSIC ULPI compliant PHY on QCOM chipsets.
+
+config PHY_QCOM_USB_SS
+ tristate "Qualcomm USB SS PHY driver"
+ depends on ARCH_QCOM || COMPILE_TEST
+ depends on EXTCON || !EXTCON # if EXTCON=m, this cannot be built-in
+ select GENERIC_PHY
+ help
+ Enable this to support the Super-Speed USB transceiver on Qualcomm
+ chips. This driver supports the PHY which uses the QSCRATCH-based
+ register set for its control sequences, normally paired with newer
+ DWC3-based Super-Speed controllers on Qualcomm SoCs.
diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/Makefile b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/Makefile
index c56efd3af205..d594d532d137 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/Makefile
@@ -9,3 +9,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_QCOM_UFS_14NM) += phy-qcom-ufs-qmp-14nm.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_QCOM_UFS_20NM) += phy-qcom-ufs-qmp-20nm.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_QCOM_USB_HS) += phy-qcom-usb-hs.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_QCOM_USB_HSIC) += phy-qcom-usb-hsic.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_QCOM_USB_SS) += phy-qcom-usb-ss.o
diff --git a/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-usb-ss.c b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-usb-ss.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..cf3216669f78
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/phy/qualcomm/phy-qcom-usb-ss.c
@@ -0,0 +1,322 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2012-2014,2017 The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
+ * Copyright (c) 2018, Linaro Limited
+ */
+
+#include <linux/clk.h>
+#include <linux/delay.h>
+#include <linux/err.h>
+#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/phy/phy.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/regulator/consumer.h>
+#include <linux/reset.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+
+#define PHY_CTRL0 0x6C
+#define PHY_CTRL1 0x70
+#define PHY_CTRL2 0x74
+#define PHY_CTRL4 0x7C
+
+/* PHY_CTRL bits */
+#define REF_PHY_EN BIT(0)
+#define LANE0_PWR_ON BIT(2)
+#define SWI_PCS_CLK_SEL BIT(4)
+#define TST_PWR_DOWN BIT(4)
+#define PHY_RESET BIT(7)
+
+#define NUM_BULK_CLKS 3
+#define NUM_BULK_REGS 2
+
+struct ssphy_priv {
+ void __iomem *base;
+ struct device *dev;
+ struct reset_control *reset_com;
+ struct reset_control *reset_phy;
+ struct regulator_bulk_data regs[NUM_BULK_REGS];
+ struct clk_bulk_data clks[NUM_BULK_CLKS];
+ struct vbus_regulator {
+ struct regulator *consumer;
+ bool voted; /* regulator balancing: extcon controlled voltage */
+ } vbus;
+ enum phy_mode mode;
+};
+
+static inline void qcom_ssphy_updatel(void __iomem *addr, u32 mask, u32 val)
+{
+ writel((readl(addr) & ~mask) | val, addr);
+}
+
+static int qcom_ssphy_vbus_enable(struct vbus_regulator *vbus)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ if (vbus->voted)
+ return 0;
+
+ ret = regulator_enable(vbus->consumer);
+ if (!ret) {
+ /* use count only increments on success */
+ vbus->voted = true;
+ }
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int qcom_ssphy_vbus_disable(struct vbus_regulator *vbus)
+{
+ if (!vbus->voted)
+ return 0;
+
+ vbus->voted = false;
+
+ return regulator_disable(vbus->consumer);
+}
+
+static int qcom_ssphy_vbus_ctrl(struct vbus_regulator *vbus, enum phy_mode mode)
+{
+ if (mode == PHY_MODE_INVALID)
+ return 0;
+
+ /* gadget attached */
+ if (mode == PHY_MODE_USB_HOST)
+ return qcom_ssphy_vbus_enable(vbus);
+
+ /* USB_DEVICE: gadget removed: enable detection */
+ return qcom_ssphy_vbus_disable(vbus);
+}
+
+static int qcom_ssphy_do_reset(struct ssphy_priv *priv)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ if (!priv->reset_com) {
+ qcom_ssphy_updatel(priv->base + PHY_CTRL1, PHY_RESET,
+ PHY_RESET);
+ usleep_range(10, 20);
+ qcom_ssphy_updatel(priv->base + PHY_CTRL1, PHY_RESET, 0);
+ } else {
+ ret = reset_control_assert(priv->reset_com);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(priv->dev, "Failed to assert reset com\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ ret = reset_control_assert(priv->reset_phy);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(priv->dev, "Failed to assert reset phy\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ usleep_range(10, 20);
+
+ ret = reset_control_deassert(priv->reset_com);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(priv->dev, "Failed to deassert reset com\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ ret = reset_control_deassert(priv->reset_phy);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(priv->dev, "Failed to deassert reset phy\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int qcom_ssphy_power_on(struct phy *phy)
+{
+ struct ssphy_priv *priv = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = regulator_bulk_enable(NUM_BULK_REGS, priv->regs);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ ret = clk_bulk_prepare_enable(NUM_BULK_CLKS, priv->clks);
+ if (ret)
+ goto err_disable_regulator;
+
+ /* depending on the extcon reported mode, enable or disable vbus */
+ ret = qcom_ssphy_vbus_ctrl(&priv->vbus, priv->mode);
+ if (ret)
+ goto err_disable_clock;
+
+ ret = qcom_ssphy_do_reset(priv);
+ if (ret)
+ goto err_disable_vbus;
+
+ writeb(SWI_PCS_CLK_SEL, priv->base + PHY_CTRL0);
+ qcom_ssphy_updatel(priv->base + PHY_CTRL4, LANE0_PWR_ON, LANE0_PWR_ON);
+ qcom_ssphy_updatel(priv->base + PHY_CTRL2, REF_PHY_EN, REF_PHY_EN);
+ qcom_ssphy_updatel(priv->base + PHY_CTRL4, TST_PWR_DOWN, 0);
+
+ return 0;
+
+err_disable_vbus:
+ qcom_ssphy_vbus_disable(&priv->vbus);
+err_disable_clock:
+ clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(NUM_BULK_CLKS, priv->clks);
+err_disable_regulator:
+ regulator_bulk_disable(NUM_BULK_REGS, priv->regs);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int qcom_ssphy_power_off(struct phy *phy)
+{
+ struct ssphy_priv *priv = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
+
+ qcom_ssphy_updatel(priv->base + PHY_CTRL4, LANE0_PWR_ON, 0);
+ qcom_ssphy_updatel(priv->base + PHY_CTRL2, REF_PHY_EN, 0);
+ qcom_ssphy_updatel(priv->base + PHY_CTRL4, TST_PWR_DOWN, TST_PWR_DOWN);
+
+ clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(NUM_BULK_CLKS, priv->clks);
+ regulator_bulk_disable(NUM_BULK_REGS, priv->regs);
+ qcom_ssphy_vbus_disable(&priv->vbus);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int qcom_ssphy_init_clock(struct ssphy_priv *priv)
+{
+ priv->clks[0].id = "ref";
+ priv->clks[1].id = "phy";
+ priv->clks[2].id = "pipe";
+
+ return devm_clk_bulk_get(priv->dev, NUM_BULK_CLKS, priv->clks);
+}
+
+static int qcom_ssphy_init_regulator(struct ssphy_priv *priv)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ priv->regs[0].supply = "vdd";
+ priv->regs[1].supply = "vdda1p8";
+ ret = devm_regulator_bulk_get(priv->dev, NUM_BULK_REGS, priv->regs);
+ if (ret) {
+ if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
+ dev_err(priv->dev, "Failed to get regulators\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ priv->vbus.voted = false;
+ priv->vbus.consumer = devm_regulator_get(priv->dev, "vbus");
+ if (IS_ERR(priv->vbus.consumer)) {
+ ret = PTR_ERR(priv->vbus.consumer);
+ if (ret != -EPROBE_DEFER)
+ dev_err(priv->dev, "Failed to get vbus regulator\n");
+ }
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static int qcom_ssphy_init_reset(struct ssphy_priv *priv)
+{
+ priv->reset_com = devm_reset_control_get_optional(priv->dev, "com");
+ if (IS_ERR(priv->reset_com)) {
+ dev_err(priv->dev, "Failed to get reset control com\n");
+ return PTR_ERR(priv->reset_com);
+ }
+
+ if (priv->reset_com) {
+ /* if reset_com is present, reset_phy is no longer optional */
+ priv->reset_phy = devm_reset_control_get(priv->dev, "phy");
+ if (IS_ERR(priv->reset_phy)) {
+ dev_err(priv->dev, "Failed to get reset control phy\n");
+ return PTR_ERR(priv->reset_phy);
+ }
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int qcom_ssphy_set_mode(struct phy *phy, enum phy_mode mode, int submode)
+{
+ struct ssphy_priv *priv = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
+
+ if (mode != PHY_MODE_USB_HOST && mode != PHY_MODE_USB_DEVICE)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ priv->mode = mode;
+ dev_dbg(priv->dev, "mode %d\n", mode);
+
+ return qcom_ssphy_vbus_ctrl(&priv->vbus, priv->mode);
+}
+
+static const struct phy_ops qcom_ssphy_ops = {
+ .set_mode = qcom_ssphy_set_mode,
+ .power_off = qcom_ssphy_power_off,
+ .power_on = qcom_ssphy_power_on,
+ .owner = THIS_MODULE,
+};
+
+static int qcom_ssphy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+ struct phy_provider *provider;
+ struct ssphy_priv *priv;
+ struct resource *res;
+ struct phy *phy;
+ int ret;
+
+ priv = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct ssphy_priv), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!priv)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ priv->dev = dev;
+ priv->mode = PHY_MODE_INVALID;
+
+ res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
+ priv->base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
+ if (IS_ERR(priv->base))
+ return PTR_ERR(priv->base);
+
+ ret = qcom_ssphy_init_clock(priv);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ ret = qcom_ssphy_init_reset(priv);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ ret = qcom_ssphy_init_regulator(priv);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ phy = devm_phy_create(dev, dev->of_node, &qcom_ssphy_ops);
+ if (IS_ERR(phy)) {
+ dev_err(dev, "Failed to create the SS phy\n");
+ return PTR_ERR(phy);
+ }
+
+ phy_set_drvdata(phy, priv);
+
+ provider = devm_of_phy_provider_register(dev, of_phy_simple_xlate);
+
+ return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(provider);
+}
+
+static const struct of_device_id qcom_ssphy_match[] = {
+ { .compatible = "qcom,snps-usb-ssphy", },
+ { },
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, qcom_ssphy_match);
+
+static struct platform_driver qcom_ssphy_driver = {
+ .probe = qcom_ssphy_probe,
+ .driver = {
+ .name = "qcom_snps_usb_ssphy",
+ .of_match_table = qcom_ssphy_match,
+ },
+};
+module_platform_driver(qcom_ssphy_driver);
+
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Qualcomm SuperSpeed USB PHY driver");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
--
2.20.1
Binding description for Qualcomm's Synopsys 1.0.0 SuperSpeed phy
controller embedded in QCS404.
Based on Sriharsha Allenki's <[email protected]> original
definitions.
Signed-off-by: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <[email protected]>
---
.../bindings/phy/qcom,snps-usb-ssphy.txt | 79 +++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 79 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,snps-usb-ssphy.txt
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,snps-usb-ssphy.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,snps-usb-ssphy.txt
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..354e6f9cef62
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,snps-usb-ssphy.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
+Qualcomm Synopsys 1.0.0 SS phy controller
+===========================================
+
+Qualcomm 1.0.0 SS phy controller supports SuperSpeed USB connectivity on
+some Qualcomm platforms.
+
+Required properties:
+
+- compatible:
+ Value type: <string>
+ Definition: Should contain "qcom,snps-usb-ssphy".
+
+- reg:
+ Value type: <prop-encoded-array>
+ Definition: USB PHY base address and length of the register map.
+
+- #phy-cells:
+ Value type: <u32>
+ Definition: Should be 0. See phy/phy-bindings.txt for details.
+
+- clocks:
+ Value type: <prop-encoded-array>
+ Definition: See clock-bindings.txt section "consumers". List of
+ three clock specifiers for reference, phy core and
+ pipe clocks.
+
+- clock-names:
+ Value type: <string>
+ Definition: Names of the clocks in 1-1 correspondence with the "clocks"
+ property. Must contain "ref", "phy" and "pipe".
+
+- vdd-supply:
+ Value type: <phandle>
+ Definition: phandle to the regulator VDD supply node.
+
+- vdda1p8-supply:
+ Value type: <phandle>
+ Definition: phandle to the regulator 1.8V supply node.
+
+Optional properties:
+
+- resets:
+ Value type: <prop-encoded-array>
+ Definition: See reset.txt section "consumers". Specifiers for COM and
+ PHY resets.
+
+- reset-names:
+ Value type: <string>
+ Definition: Names of the resets in 1-1 correspondence with the "resets"
+ property. Must contain "com" and "phy" if the property is
+ specified.
+
+Required child nodes:
+
+- usb connector node as defined in bindings/connector/usb-connector.txt
+ containing the property vbus-supply.
+
+Example:
+
+usb3_phy: usb3-phy@78000 {
+ compatible = "qcom,snps-usb-ssphy";
+ reg = <0x78000 0x400>;
+ #phy-cells = <0>;
+ clocks = <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_LN_BB_CLK>,
+ <&gcc GCC_USB_HS_PHY_CFG_AHB_CLK>,
+ <&gcc GCC_USB3_PHY_PIPE_CLK>;
+ clock-names = "ref", "phy", "pipe";
+ resets = <&gcc GCC_USB3_PHY_BCR>,
+ <&gcc GCC_USB3PHY_PHY_BCR>;
+ reset-names = "com", "phy";
+ vdd-supply = <&vreg_l3_1p05>;
+ vdda1p8-supply = <&vreg_l5_1p8>;
+ usb3_c_connector: usb3-c-connector {
+ compatible = "usb-c-connector";
+ label = "USB-C";
+ type = "micro";
+ vbus-supply = <&usb3_vbus_reg>;
+ };
+};
--
2.20.1
Some phys might need to control their VBUS regulators while not being
supplied by them. If such support is required, use the vbus-supply
property in the connector to retrieve the regulator.
Signed-off-by: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <[email protected]>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/connector/usb-connector.txt | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/connector/usb-connector.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/connector/usb-connector.txt
index a9a2f2fc44f2..2ad22dd6dc39 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/connector/usb-connector.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/connector/usb-connector.txt
@@ -16,6 +16,10 @@ Optional properties:
non-fullsize connectors: "mini", "micro".
- self-powered: Set this property if the usb device that has its own power
source.
+- vbus-supply:
+ Value type: <phandle>
+ Definition: phandle to the regulator VBUS supply node. Set this property if
+ the connector is supplied by VBUS.
Optional properties for usb-c-connector:
- power-role: should be one of "source", "sink" or "dual"(DRP) if typec
--
2.20.1
On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 12:17:33PM +0100, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz wrote:
> Binding description for Qualcomm's Synopsys 1.0.0 SuperSpeed phy
> controller embedded in QCS404.
>
> Based on Sriharsha Allenki's <[email protected]> original
> definitions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <[email protected]>
> ---
> .../bindings/phy/qcom,snps-usb-ssphy.txt | 79 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,snps-usb-ssphy.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,snps-usb-ssphy.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,snps-usb-ssphy.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..354e6f9cef62
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,snps-usb-ssphy.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
> +Qualcomm Synopsys 1.0.0 SS phy controller
> +===========================================
> +
> +Qualcomm 1.0.0 SS phy controller supports SuperSpeed USB connectivity on
> +some Qualcomm platforms.
> +
> +Required properties:
> +
> +- compatible:
> + Value type: <string>
> + Definition: Should contain "qcom,snps-usb-ssphy".
Still not specific. Put the SoC name(s) in it.
> +
> +- reg:
> + Value type: <prop-encoded-array>
> + Definition: USB PHY base address and length of the register map.
> +
> +- #phy-cells:
> + Value type: <u32>
> + Definition: Should be 0. See phy/phy-bindings.txt for details.
> +
> +- clocks:
> + Value type: <prop-encoded-array>
> + Definition: See clock-bindings.txt section "consumers". List of
> + three clock specifiers for reference, phy core and
> + pipe clocks.
> +
> +- clock-names:
> + Value type: <string>
> + Definition: Names of the clocks in 1-1 correspondence with the "clocks"
> + property. Must contain "ref", "phy" and "pipe".
> +
> +- vdd-supply:
> + Value type: <phandle>
> + Definition: phandle to the regulator VDD supply node.
> +
> +- vdda1p8-supply:
> + Value type: <phandle>
> + Definition: phandle to the regulator 1.8V supply node.
> +
> +Optional properties:
> +
> +- resets:
> + Value type: <prop-encoded-array>
> + Definition: See reset.txt section "consumers". Specifiers for COM and
> + PHY resets.
> +
> +- reset-names:
> + Value type: <string>
> + Definition: Names of the resets in 1-1 correspondence with the "resets"
> + property. Must contain "com" and "phy" if the property is
> + specified.
> +
> +Required child nodes:
> +
> +- usb connector node as defined in bindings/connector/usb-connector.txt
> + containing the property vbus-supply.
> +
> +Example:
> +
> +usb3_phy: usb3-phy@78000 {
> + compatible = "qcom,snps-usb-ssphy";
> + reg = <0x78000 0x400>;
> + #phy-cells = <0>;
> + clocks = <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_LN_BB_CLK>,
> + <&gcc GCC_USB_HS_PHY_CFG_AHB_CLK>,
> + <&gcc GCC_USB3_PHY_PIPE_CLK>;
> + clock-names = "ref", "phy", "pipe";
> + resets = <&gcc GCC_USB3_PHY_BCR>,
> + <&gcc GCC_USB3PHY_PHY_BCR>;
> + reset-names = "com", "phy";
> + vdd-supply = <&vreg_l3_1p05>;
> + vdda1p8-supply = <&vreg_l5_1p8>;
> + usb3_c_connector: usb3-c-connector {
> + compatible = "usb-c-connector";
> + label = "USB-C";
> + type = "micro";
'micro' is certainly not right for USB-C. Probably should be omitted?
> + vbus-supply = <&usb3_vbus_reg>;
> + };
> +};
> --
> 2.20.1
>
On Thu, 7 Feb 2019 12:17:32 +0100, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz wrote:
> Some phys might need to control their VBUS regulators while not being
> supplied by them. If such support is required, use the vbus-supply
> property in the connector to retrieve the regulator.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <[email protected]>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/connector/usb-connector.txt | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
On Thu, 7 Feb 2019 12:17:31 +0100, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz wrote:
> This binding is not used by any driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <[email protected]>
> ---
> .../bindings/phy/qcom-dwc3-usb-phy.txt | 37 -------------------
> 1 file changed, 37 deletions(-)
> delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom-dwc3-usb-phy.txt
>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
On Thu 07 Feb 03:17 PST 2019, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz wrote:
> Binding description for Qualcomm's Synopsys 1.0.0 SuperSpeed phy
> controller embedded in QCS404.
>
> Based on Sriharsha Allenki's <[email protected]> original
> definitions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <[email protected]>
> ---
> .../bindings/phy/qcom,snps-usb-ssphy.txt | 79 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,snps-usb-ssphy.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,snps-usb-ssphy.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,snps-usb-ssphy.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..354e6f9cef62
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,snps-usb-ssphy.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
> +Qualcomm Synopsys 1.0.0 SS phy controller
> +===========================================
> +
> +Qualcomm 1.0.0 SS phy controller supports SuperSpeed USB connectivity on
> +some Qualcomm platforms.
> +
> +Required properties:
> +
> +- compatible:
> + Value type: <string>
> + Definition: Should contain "qcom,snps-usb-ssphy".
Per Rob's request make this:
Should contain "qcom,qcs404-snps-usb-ssphy" and "qcom,snps-usb-ssphy"
You can then leave the driver matching on qcom,snps-usb-ssphy for now
and if we ever find this to be incompatible with other platforms we can
make the driver match on the platform-specific compatible.
> +
> +- reg:
> + Value type: <prop-encoded-array>
> + Definition: USB PHY base address and length of the register map.
> +
> +- #phy-cells:
> + Value type: <u32>
> + Definition: Should be 0. See phy/phy-bindings.txt for details.
> +
> +- clocks:
> + Value type: <prop-encoded-array>
> + Definition: See clock-bindings.txt section "consumers". List of
> + three clock specifiers for reference, phy core and
> + pipe clocks.
> +
> +- clock-names:
> + Value type: <string>
> + Definition: Names of the clocks in 1-1 correspondence with the "clocks"
> + property. Must contain "ref", "phy" and "pipe".
> +
> +- vdd-supply:
> + Value type: <phandle>
> + Definition: phandle to the regulator VDD supply node.
> +
> +- vdda1p8-supply:
> + Value type: <phandle>
> + Definition: phandle to the regulator 1.8V supply node.
> +
> +Optional properties:
> +
> +- resets:
> + Value type: <prop-encoded-array>
> + Definition: See reset.txt section "consumers". Specifiers for COM and
> + PHY resets.
> +
> +- reset-names:
> + Value type: <string>
> + Definition: Names of the resets in 1-1 correspondence with the "resets"
> + property. Must contain "com" and "phy" if the property is
> + specified.
> +
> +Required child nodes:
> +
> +- usb connector node as defined in bindings/connector/usb-connector.txt
> + containing the property vbus-supply.
> +
> +Example:
> +
> +usb3_phy: usb3-phy@78000 {
> + compatible = "qcom,snps-usb-ssphy";
> + reg = <0x78000 0x400>;
> + #phy-cells = <0>;
> + clocks = <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_LN_BB_CLK>,
> + <&gcc GCC_USB_HS_PHY_CFG_AHB_CLK>,
> + <&gcc GCC_USB3_PHY_PIPE_CLK>;
> + clock-names = "ref", "phy", "pipe";
> + resets = <&gcc GCC_USB3_PHY_BCR>,
> + <&gcc GCC_USB3PHY_PHY_BCR>;
> + reset-names = "com", "phy";
> + vdd-supply = <&vreg_l3_1p05>;
> + vdda1p8-supply = <&vreg_l5_1p8>;
> + usb3_c_connector: usb3-c-connector {
The USB-C connector is attached both to the HS and SS PHYs, so I think
you should represent this external to this node and use of_graph to
query it.
So the connector should look similar to example 2 in
connector/usb-connector.txt.
Regards,
Bjorn
> + compatible = "usb-c-connector";
> + label = "USB-C";
> + type = "micro";
> + vbus-supply = <&usb3_vbus_reg>;
> + };
> +};
> --
> 2.20.1
>
On 2/23/19 17:52, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Thu 07 Feb 03:17 PST 2019, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz wrote:
>
>> Binding description for Qualcomm's Synopsys 1.0.0 SuperSpeed phy
>> controller embedded in QCS404.
>>
>> Based on Sriharsha Allenki's <[email protected]> original
>> definitions.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> .../bindings/phy/qcom,snps-usb-ssphy.txt | 79 +++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 79 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,snps-usb-ssphy.txt
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,snps-usb-ssphy.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,snps-usb-ssphy.txt
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..354e6f9cef62
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,snps-usb-ssphy.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,79 @@
>> +Qualcomm Synopsys 1.0.0 SS phy controller
>> +===========================================
>> +
>> +Qualcomm 1.0.0 SS phy controller supports SuperSpeed USB connectivity on
>> +some Qualcomm platforms.
>> +
>> +Required properties:
>> +
>> +- compatible:
>> + Value type: <string>
>> + Definition: Should contain "qcom,snps-usb-ssphy".
>
> Per Rob's request make this:
>
> Should contain "qcom,qcs404-snps-usb-ssphy" and "qcom,snps-usb-ssphy"
ok
>
> You can then leave the driver matching on qcom,snps-usb-ssphy for now
> and if we ever find this to be incompatible with other platforms we can
> make the driver match on the platform-specific compatible.
ok
>
>> +
>> +- reg:
>> + Value type: <prop-encoded-array>
>> + Definition: USB PHY base address and length of the register map.
>> +
>> +- #phy-cells:
>> + Value type: <u32>
>> + Definition: Should be 0. See phy/phy-bindings.txt for details.
>> +
>> +- clocks:
>> + Value type: <prop-encoded-array>
>> + Definition: See clock-bindings.txt section "consumers". List of
>> + three clock specifiers for reference, phy core and
>> + pipe clocks.
>> +
>> +- clock-names:
>> + Value type: <string>
>> + Definition: Names of the clocks in 1-1 correspondence with the "clocks"
>> + property. Must contain "ref", "phy" and "pipe".
>> +
>> +- vdd-supply:
>> + Value type: <phandle>
>> + Definition: phandle to the regulator VDD supply node.
>> +
>> +- vdda1p8-supply:
>> + Value type: <phandle>
>> + Definition: phandle to the regulator 1.8V supply node.
>> +
>> +Optional properties:
>> +
>> +- resets:
>> + Value type: <prop-encoded-array>
>> + Definition: See reset.txt section "consumers". Specifiers for COM and
>> + PHY resets.
>> +
>> +- reset-names:
>> + Value type: <string>
>> + Definition: Names of the resets in 1-1 correspondence with the "resets"
>> + property. Must contain "com" and "phy" if the property is
>> + specified.
>> +
>> +Required child nodes:
>> +
>> +- usb connector node as defined in bindings/connector/usb-connector.txt
>> + containing the property vbus-supply.
>> +
>> +Example:
>> +
>> +usb3_phy: usb3-phy@78000 {
>> + compatible = "qcom,snps-usb-ssphy";
>> + reg = <0x78000 0x400>;
>> + #phy-cells = <0>;
>> + clocks = <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_LN_BB_CLK>,
>> + <&gcc GCC_USB_HS_PHY_CFG_AHB_CLK>,
>> + <&gcc GCC_USB3_PHY_PIPE_CLK>;
>> + clock-names = "ref", "phy", "pipe";
>> + resets = <&gcc GCC_USB3_PHY_BCR>,
>> + <&gcc GCC_USB3PHY_PHY_BCR>;
>> + reset-names = "com", "phy";
>> + vdd-supply = <&vreg_l3_1p05>;
>> + vdda1p8-supply = <&vreg_l5_1p8>;
>> + usb3_c_connector: usb3-c-connector {
>
> The USB-C connector is attached both to the HS and SS PHYs, so I think
> you should represent this external to this node and use of_graph to
> query it.
but AFAICS we wont be able to retrieve the vbux-supply from an external
node (that interface does not exist).
rob, do you have a suggestion?
>
> So the connector should look similar to example 2 in
> connector/usb-connector.txt.
>
> Regards,
> Bjorn
>
>> + compatible = "usb-c-connector";
>> + label = "USB-C";
>> + type = "micro";
>> + vbus-supply = <&usb3_vbus_reg>;
>> + };
>> +};
>> --
>> 2.20.1
>>
>
Quoting Jorge Ramirez (2019-08-29 00:03:48)
> On 2/23/19 17:52, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > On Thu 07 Feb 03:17 PST 2019, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz wrote:
> >> +
> >> +Required child nodes:
> >> +
> >> +- usb connector node as defined in bindings/connector/usb-connector.txt
> >> + containing the property vbus-supply.
> >> +
> >> +Example:
> >> +
> >> +usb3_phy: usb3-phy@78000 {
> >> + compatible = "qcom,snps-usb-ssphy";
> >> + reg = <0x78000 0x400>;
> >> + #phy-cells = <0>;
> >> + clocks = <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_LN_BB_CLK>,
> >> + <&gcc GCC_USB_HS_PHY_CFG_AHB_CLK>,
> >> + <&gcc GCC_USB3_PHY_PIPE_CLK>;
> >> + clock-names = "ref", "phy", "pipe";
> >> + resets = <&gcc GCC_USB3_PHY_BCR>,
> >> + <&gcc GCC_USB3PHY_PHY_BCR>;
> >> + reset-names = "com", "phy";
> >> + vdd-supply = <&vreg_l3_1p05>;
> >> + vdda1p8-supply = <&vreg_l5_1p8>;
> >> + usb3_c_connector: usb3-c-connector {
Node name should be 'connector', not usb3-c-connector.
> >
> > The USB-C connector is attached both to the HS and SS PHYs, so I think
> > you should represent this external to this node and use of_graph to
> > query it.
>
> but AFAICS we wont be able to retrieve the vbux-supply from an external
> node (that interface does not exist).
>
> rob, do you have a suggestion?
Shouldn't the vbus supply be in the phy? Or is this a situation where
the phy itself doesn't have the vbus supply going to it because the PMIC
gets in the way and handles the vbus for the connector by having the SoC
communicate with the PMIC about when to turn the vbus on and off, etc?
>
> >
> > So the connector should look similar to example 2 in
> > connector/usb-connector.txt.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Bjorn
> >
> >> + compatible = "usb-c-connector";
> >> + label = "USB-C";
> >> + type = "micro";
> >> + vbus-supply = <&usb3_vbus_reg>;
> >> + };
> >> +};
On Fri 30 Aug 09:01 PDT 2019, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Jorge Ramirez (2019-08-29 00:03:48)
> > On 2/23/19 17:52, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > > On Thu 07 Feb 03:17 PST 2019, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz wrote:
> > >> +
> > >> +Required child nodes:
> > >> +
> > >> +- usb connector node as defined in bindings/connector/usb-connector.txt
> > >> + containing the property vbus-supply.
> > >> +
> > >> +Example:
> > >> +
> > >> +usb3_phy: usb3-phy@78000 {
> > >> + compatible = "qcom,snps-usb-ssphy";
> > >> + reg = <0x78000 0x400>;
> > >> + #phy-cells = <0>;
> > >> + clocks = <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_LN_BB_CLK>,
> > >> + <&gcc GCC_USB_HS_PHY_CFG_AHB_CLK>,
> > >> + <&gcc GCC_USB3_PHY_PIPE_CLK>;
> > >> + clock-names = "ref", "phy", "pipe";
> > >> + resets = <&gcc GCC_USB3_PHY_BCR>,
> > >> + <&gcc GCC_USB3PHY_PHY_BCR>;
> > >> + reset-names = "com", "phy";
> > >> + vdd-supply = <&vreg_l3_1p05>;
> > >> + vdda1p8-supply = <&vreg_l5_1p8>;
> > >> + usb3_c_connector: usb3-c-connector {
>
> Node name should be 'connector', not usb3-c-connector.
>
It probably has to be usb-c-connector, because we have a
micro-usb-connector on the same board.
> > >
> > > The USB-C connector is attached both to the HS and SS PHYs, so I think
> > > you should represent this external to this node and use of_graph to
> > > query it.
> >
> > but AFAICS we wont be able to retrieve the vbux-supply from an external
> > node (that interface does not exist).
> >
> > rob, do you have a suggestion?
>
> Shouldn't the vbus supply be in the phy? Or is this a situation where
> the phy itself doesn't have the vbus supply going to it because the PMIC
> gets in the way and handles the vbus for the connector by having the SoC
> communicate with the PMIC about when to turn the vbus on and off, etc?
>
That's correct, the VBUS comes out of the PMIC and goes directly to the
connector.
The additional complicating factor here is that the connector is wired
to a USB2 phy as well, so we need to wire up detection and vbus control
to both of them - but I think this will be fine, if we can only figure
out a sane way of getting hold of the vbus-supply.
Regards,
Bjorn
Quoting Bjorn Andersson (2019-08-30 09:45:20)
> On Fri 30 Aug 09:01 PDT 2019, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
> > Quoting Jorge Ramirez (2019-08-29 00:03:48)
> > > On 2/23/19 17:52, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > > > On Thu 07 Feb 03:17 PST 2019, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz wrote:
> > > >> +
> > > >> +Required child nodes:
> > > >> +
> > > >> +- usb connector node as defined in bindings/connector/usb-connector.txt
> > > >> + containing the property vbus-supply.
> > > >> +
> > > >> +Example:
> > > >> +
> > > >> +usb3_phy: usb3-phy@78000 {
> > > >> + compatible = "qcom,snps-usb-ssphy";
> > > >> + reg = <0x78000 0x400>;
> > > >> + #phy-cells = <0>;
> > > >> + clocks = <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_LN_BB_CLK>,
> > > >> + <&gcc GCC_USB_HS_PHY_CFG_AHB_CLK>,
> > > >> + <&gcc GCC_USB3_PHY_PIPE_CLK>;
> > > >> + clock-names = "ref", "phy", "pipe";
> > > >> + resets = <&gcc GCC_USB3_PHY_BCR>,
> > > >> + <&gcc GCC_USB3PHY_PHY_BCR>;
> > > >> + reset-names = "com", "phy";
> > > >> + vdd-supply = <&vreg_l3_1p05>;
> > > >> + vdda1p8-supply = <&vreg_l5_1p8>;
> > > >> + usb3_c_connector: usb3-c-connector {
> >
> > Node name should be 'connector', not usb3-c-connector.
> >
>
> It probably has to be usb-c-connector, because we have a
> micro-usb-connector on the same board.
Ok. Or connector@1 and connector@2? Our toplevel node container story is
sort of sad because we have to play tricks with node names. But in the
example, just connector I presume?
>
> > > >
> > > > The USB-C connector is attached both to the HS and SS PHYs, so I think
> > > > you should represent this external to this node and use of_graph to
> > > > query it.
> > >
> > > but AFAICS we wont be able to retrieve the vbux-supply from an external
> > > node (that interface does not exist).
> > >
> > > rob, do you have a suggestion?
> >
> > Shouldn't the vbus supply be in the phy? Or is this a situation where
> > the phy itself doesn't have the vbus supply going to it because the PMIC
> > gets in the way and handles the vbus for the connector by having the SoC
> > communicate with the PMIC about when to turn the vbus on and off, etc?
> >
>
> That's correct, the VBUS comes out of the PMIC and goes directly to the
> connector.
>
> The additional complicating factor here is that the connector is wired
> to a USB2 phy as well, so we need to wire up detection and vbus control
> to both of them - but I think this will be fine, if we can only figure
> out a sane way of getting hold of the vbus-supply.
>
Does it really matter to describe this situation though? Maybe it's
simpler to throw the vbus supply into the phy and control it from the
phy driver, even if it never really goes there. Or put it into the
toplevel usb controller?
On 8/30/19 20:28, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Bjorn Andersson (2019-08-30 09:45:20)
>> On Fri 30 Aug 09:01 PDT 2019, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>
>>> Quoting Jorge Ramirez (2019-08-29 00:03:48)
>>>> On 2/23/19 17:52, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
>>>>> On Thu 07 Feb 03:17 PST 2019, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz wrote:
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +Required child nodes:
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +- usb connector node as defined in bindings/connector/usb-connector.txt
>>>>>> + containing the property vbus-supply.
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +Example:
>>>>>> +
>>>>>> +usb3_phy: usb3-phy@78000 {
>>>>>> + compatible = "qcom,snps-usb-ssphy";
>>>>>> + reg = <0x78000 0x400>;
>>>>>> + #phy-cells = <0>;
>>>>>> + clocks = <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_LN_BB_CLK>,
>>>>>> + <&gcc GCC_USB_HS_PHY_CFG_AHB_CLK>,
>>>>>> + <&gcc GCC_USB3_PHY_PIPE_CLK>;
>>>>>> + clock-names = "ref", "phy", "pipe";
>>>>>> + resets = <&gcc GCC_USB3_PHY_BCR>,
>>>>>> + <&gcc GCC_USB3PHY_PHY_BCR>;
>>>>>> + reset-names = "com", "phy";
>>>>>> + vdd-supply = <&vreg_l3_1p05>;
>>>>>> + vdda1p8-supply = <&vreg_l5_1p8>;
>>>>>> + usb3_c_connector: usb3-c-connector {
>>>
>>> Node name should be 'connector', not usb3-c-connector.
>>>
>>
>> It probably has to be usb-c-connector, because we have a
>> micro-usb-connector on the same board.
>
> Ok. Or connector@1 and connector@2? Our toplevel node container story is
> sort of sad because we have to play tricks with node names. But in the
> example, just connector I presume?
>
>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The USB-C connector is attached both to the HS and SS PHYs, so I think
>>>>> you should represent this external to this node and use of_graph to
>>>>> query it.
>>>>
>>>> but AFAICS we wont be able to retrieve the vbux-supply from an external
>>>> node (that interface does not exist).
>>>>
>>>> rob, do you have a suggestion?
>>>
>>> Shouldn't the vbus supply be in the phy? Or is this a situation where
>>> the phy itself doesn't have the vbus supply going to it because the PMIC
>>> gets in the way and handles the vbus for the connector by having the SoC
>>> communicate with the PMIC about when to turn the vbus on and off, etc?
>>>
>>
>> That's correct, the VBUS comes out of the PMIC and goes directly to the
>> connector.
>>
>> The additional complicating factor here is that the connector is wired
>> to a USB2 phy as well, so we need to wire up detection and vbus control
>> to both of them - but I think this will be fine, if we can only figure
>> out a sane way of getting hold of the vbus-supply.
>>
>
> Does it really matter to describe this situation though? Maybe it's
> simpler to throw the vbus supply into the phy and control it from the
> phy driver, even if it never really goes there. Or put it into the
> toplevel usb controller?
>
that would work for me - the connector definition seemed a better way to
explain the connectivity but since we cant retrieve the supply from the
external node is not of much functional use.
but please let me know how to proceed. shall I add the supply back to
the phy?
On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 08:23:04AM +0200, Jorge Ramirez wrote:
> On 8/30/19 20:28, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Bjorn Andersson (2019-08-30 09:45:20)
> >> On Fri 30 Aug 09:01 PDT 2019, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >>
> >>> Quoting Jorge Ramirez (2019-08-29 00:03:48)
> >>>> On 2/23/19 17:52, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> >>>>> On Thu 07 Feb 03:17 PST 2019, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz wrote:
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> +Required child nodes:
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> +- usb connector node as defined in bindings/connector/usb-connector.txt
> >>>>>> + containing the property vbus-supply.
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> +Example:
> >>>>>> +
> >>>>>> +usb3_phy: usb3-phy@78000 {
> >>>>>> + compatible = "qcom,snps-usb-ssphy";
> >>>>>> + reg = <0x78000 0x400>;
> >>>>>> + #phy-cells = <0>;
> >>>>>> + clocks = <&rpmcc RPM_SMD_LN_BB_CLK>,
> >>>>>> + <&gcc GCC_USB_HS_PHY_CFG_AHB_CLK>,
> >>>>>> + <&gcc GCC_USB3_PHY_PIPE_CLK>;
> >>>>>> + clock-names = "ref", "phy", "pipe";
> >>>>>> + resets = <&gcc GCC_USB3_PHY_BCR>,
> >>>>>> + <&gcc GCC_USB3PHY_PHY_BCR>;
> >>>>>> + reset-names = "com", "phy";
> >>>>>> + vdd-supply = <&vreg_l3_1p05>;
> >>>>>> + vdda1p8-supply = <&vreg_l5_1p8>;
> >>>>>> + usb3_c_connector: usb3-c-connector {
> >>>
> >>> Node name should be 'connector', not usb3-c-connector.
> >>>
> >>
> >> It probably has to be usb-c-connector, because we have a
> >> micro-usb-connector on the same board.
> >
> > Ok. Or connector@1 and connector@2? Our toplevel node container story is
> > sort of sad because we have to play tricks with node names. But in the
> > example, just connector I presume?
> >
> >>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The USB-C connector is attached both to the HS and SS PHYs, so I think
> >>>>> you should represent this external to this node and use of_graph to
> >>>>> query it.
> >>>>
> >>>> but AFAICS we wont be able to retrieve the vbux-supply from an external
> >>>> node (that interface does not exist).
> >>>>
> >>>> rob, do you have a suggestion?
> >>>
> >>> Shouldn't the vbus supply be in the phy? Or is this a situation where
> >>> the phy itself doesn't have the vbus supply going to it because the PMIC
> >>> gets in the way and handles the vbus for the connector by having the SoC
> >>> communicate with the PMIC about when to turn the vbus on and off, etc?
> >>>
> >>
> >> That's correct, the VBUS comes out of the PMIC and goes directly to the
> >> connector.
> >>
> >> The additional complicating factor here is that the connector is wired
> >> to a USB2 phy as well, so we need to wire up detection and vbus control
> >> to both of them - but I think this will be fine, if we can only figure
> >> out a sane way of getting hold of the vbus-supply.
> >>
> >
> > Does it really matter to describe this situation though? Maybe it's
> > simpler to throw the vbus supply into the phy and control it from the
> > phy driver, even if it never really goes there. Or put it into the
> > toplevel usb controller?
> >
> that would work for me - the connector definition seemed a better way to
> explain the connectivity but since we cant retrieve the supply from the
> external node is not of much functional use.
>
> but please let me know how to proceed. shall I add the supply back to
> the phy?
Putting it in the toplevel usb node makes sense to me, since that's
usually the driver that knows when it's switching into host mode and
needs to turn on VBUS. The dwc3-qcom driver & bindings currently don't
do this but there's precedent in a couple of the other dwc3 "glues"--see
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/{amlogic\,dwc3,omap-usb}.txt
One exception is if the PMIC is also USB-PD capable and can do power
role swap, in which case the VBUS control needs to be done by the TCPM,
so that'd be a case where having vbus-supply in the connector node might
make more sense.
Jack
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Quoting Jack Pham (2019-09-03 10:39:24)
> On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 08:23:04AM +0200, Jorge Ramirez wrote:
> > On 8/30/19 20:28, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > Quoting Bjorn Andersson (2019-08-30 09:45:20)
> > >> On Fri 30 Aug 09:01 PDT 2019, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> The USB-C connector is attached both to the HS and SS PHYs, so I think
> > >>>>> you should represent this external to this node and use of_graph to
> > >>>>> query it.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> but AFAICS we wont be able to retrieve the vbux-supply from an external
> > >>>> node (that interface does not exist).
> > >>>>
> > >>>> rob, do you have a suggestion?
> > >>>
> > >>> Shouldn't the vbus supply be in the phy? Or is this a situation where
> > >>> the phy itself doesn't have the vbus supply going to it because the PMIC
> > >>> gets in the way and handles the vbus for the connector by having the SoC
> > >>> communicate with the PMIC about when to turn the vbus on and off, etc?
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> That's correct, the VBUS comes out of the PMIC and goes directly to the
> > >> connector.
> > >>
> > >> The additional complicating factor here is that the connector is wired
> > >> to a USB2 phy as well, so we need to wire up detection and vbus control
> > >> to both of them - but I think this will be fine, if we can only figure
> > >> out a sane way of getting hold of the vbus-supply.
> > >>
> > >
> > > Does it really matter to describe this situation though? Maybe it's
> > > simpler to throw the vbus supply into the phy and control it from the
> > > phy driver, even if it never really goes there. Or put it into the
> > > toplevel usb controller?
> > >
> > that would work for me - the connector definition seemed a better way to
> > explain the connectivity but since we cant retrieve the supply from the
> > external node is not of much functional use.
> >
> > but please let me know how to proceed. shall I add the supply back to
> > the phy?
So does the vbus actually go to the phy? I thought it never went there
and the power for the phy was different (and possibly lower in voltage).
>
> Putting it in the toplevel usb node makes sense to me, since that's
> usually the driver that knows when it's switching into host mode and
> needs to turn on VBUS. The dwc3-qcom driver & bindings currently don't
> do this but there's precedent in a couple of the other dwc3 "glues"--see
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/{amlogic\,dwc3,omap-usb}.txt
>
> One exception is if the PMIC is also USB-PD capable and can do power
> role swap, in which case the VBUS control needs to be done by the TCPM,
> so that'd be a case where having vbus-supply in the connector node might
> make more sense.
>
The other way is to implement the code to get the vbus supply out of a
connector. Then any driver can do the work if it knows it needs to and
we don't have to care that the vbus isn't going somewhere. I suppose
that would need an of_regulator_get() sort of API that can get the
regulator out of there? Or to make the connector into a struct device
that can get the regulator out per some generic connector driver and
then pass it through to the USB controller when it asks for it. Maybe
try to prototype that out?
On Tue 03 Sep 14:45 PDT 2019, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Jack Pham (2019-09-03 10:39:24)
> > On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 08:23:04AM +0200, Jorge Ramirez wrote:
> > > On 8/30/19 20:28, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > > Quoting Bjorn Andersson (2019-08-30 09:45:20)
> > > >> On Fri 30 Aug 09:01 PDT 2019, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> The USB-C connector is attached both to the HS and SS PHYs, so I think
> > > >>>>> you should represent this external to this node and use of_graph to
> > > >>>>> query it.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> but AFAICS we wont be able to retrieve the vbux-supply from an external
> > > >>>> node (that interface does not exist).
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> rob, do you have a suggestion?
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Shouldn't the vbus supply be in the phy? Or is this a situation where
> > > >>> the phy itself doesn't have the vbus supply going to it because the PMIC
> > > >>> gets in the way and handles the vbus for the connector by having the SoC
> > > >>> communicate with the PMIC about when to turn the vbus on and off, etc?
> > > >>>
> > > >>
> > > >> That's correct, the VBUS comes out of the PMIC and goes directly to the
> > > >> connector.
> > > >>
> > > >> The additional complicating factor here is that the connector is wired
> > > >> to a USB2 phy as well, so we need to wire up detection and vbus control
> > > >> to both of them - but I think this will be fine, if we can only figure
> > > >> out a sane way of getting hold of the vbus-supply.
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > Does it really matter to describe this situation though? Maybe it's
> > > > simpler to throw the vbus supply into the phy and control it from the
> > > > phy driver, even if it never really goes there. Or put it into the
> > > > toplevel usb controller?
> > > >
> > > that would work for me - the connector definition seemed a better way to
> > > explain the connectivity but since we cant retrieve the supply from the
> > > external node is not of much functional use.
> > >
> > > but please let me know how to proceed. shall I add the supply back to
> > > the phy?
>
> So does the vbus actually go to the phy? I thought it never went there
> and the power for the phy was different (and possibly lower in voltage).
>
No, the PHYs use different - lower voltage - supplies to operate. VBUS
is coming from a 5V supply straight to the connector and plug-detect
logic (which is passive in this design).
> >
> > Putting it in the toplevel usb node makes sense to me, since that's
> > usually the driver that knows when it's switching into host mode and
> > needs to turn on VBUS. The dwc3-qcom driver & bindings currently don't
> > do this but there's precedent in a couple of the other dwc3 "glues"--see
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/{amlogic\,dwc3,omap-usb}.txt
> >
> > One exception is if the PMIC is also USB-PD capable and can do power
> > role swap, in which case the VBUS control needs to be done by the TCPM,
> > so that'd be a case where having vbus-supply in the connector node might
> > make more sense.
> >
>
> The other way is to implement the code to get the vbus supply out of a
> connector. Then any driver can do the work if it knows it needs to and
> we don't have to care that the vbus isn't going somewhere. I suppose
> that would need an of_regulator_get() sort of API that can get the
> regulator out of there? Or to make the connector into a struct device
> that can get the regulator out per some generic connector driver and
> then pass it through to the USB controller when it asks for it. Maybe
> try to prototype that out?
>
The examples given in the DT bindings describes the connector as a child
of a PMIC, with of_graph somehow tying it to the various inputs. But in
these examples vbus is handled by implicitly inside the MFD, where
extcon is informed about the plug event they toggle vbus as well.
In our case we have a extcon-usb-gpio to detect mode, which per Jorge's
proposal will trickle down to the PHY and become a regulator calls on
either some external regulator or more typically one of the chargers in
the system.
So if we come up with a struct device for the connector and some API for
toggling the vbus we're going to have to fairly abstract entities
representing pretty much the same thing - and in a design with a mux we
would have a different setup.
Regards,
Bjorn
On 9/4/19 01:34, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Tue 03 Sep 14:45 PDT 2019, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
>> Quoting Jack Pham (2019-09-03 10:39:24)
>>> On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 08:23:04AM +0200, Jorge Ramirez wrote:
>>>> On 8/30/19 20:28, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>>>> Quoting Bjorn Andersson (2019-08-30 09:45:20)
>>>>>> On Fri 30 Aug 09:01 PDT 2019, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The USB-C connector is attached both to the HS and SS PHYs, so I think
>>>>>>>>> you should represent this external to this node and use of_graph to
>>>>>>>>> query it.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> but AFAICS we wont be able to retrieve the vbux-supply from an external
>>>>>>>> node (that interface does not exist).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> rob, do you have a suggestion?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Shouldn't the vbus supply be in the phy? Or is this a situation where
>>>>>>> the phy itself doesn't have the vbus supply going to it because the PMIC
>>>>>>> gets in the way and handles the vbus for the connector by having the SoC
>>>>>>> communicate with the PMIC about when to turn the vbus on and off, etc?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That's correct, the VBUS comes out of the PMIC and goes directly to the
>>>>>> connector.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The additional complicating factor here is that the connector is wired
>>>>>> to a USB2 phy as well, so we need to wire up detection and vbus control
>>>>>> to both of them - but I think this will be fine, if we can only figure
>>>>>> out a sane way of getting hold of the vbus-supply.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Does it really matter to describe this situation though? Maybe it's
>>>>> simpler to throw the vbus supply into the phy and control it from the
>>>>> phy driver, even if it never really goes there. Or put it into the
>>>>> toplevel usb controller?
>>>>>
>>>> that would work for me - the connector definition seemed a better way to
>>>> explain the connectivity but since we cant retrieve the supply from the
>>>> external node is not of much functional use.
>>>>
>>>> but please let me know how to proceed. shall I add the supply back to
>>>> the phy?
>>
>> So does the vbus actually go to the phy? I thought it never went there
>> and the power for the phy was different (and possibly lower in voltage).
>>
>
> No, the PHYs use different - lower voltage - supplies to operate. VBUS
> is coming from a 5V supply straight to the connector and plug-detect
> logic (which is passive in this design).
>
>>>
>>> Putting it in the toplevel usb node makes sense to me, since that's
>>> usually the driver that knows when it's switching into host mode and
>>> needs to turn on VBUS. The dwc3-qcom driver & bindings currently don't
>>> do this but there's precedent in a couple of the other dwc3 "glues"--see
>>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/{amlogic\,dwc3,omap-usb}.txt
>>>
>>> One exception is if the PMIC is also USB-PD capable and can do power
>>> role swap, in which case the VBUS control needs to be done by the TCPM,
>>> so that'd be a case where having vbus-supply in the connector node might
>>> make more sense.
>>>
>>
>> The other way is to implement the code to get the vbus supply out of a
>> connector. Then any driver can do the work if it knows it needs to and
>> we don't have to care that the vbus isn't going somewhere. I suppose
>> that would need an of_regulator_get() sort of API that can get the
>> regulator out of there? Or to make the connector into a struct device
>> that can get the regulator out per some generic connector driver and
>> then pass it through to the USB controller when it asks for it. Maybe
>> try to prototype that out?
>>
>
> The examples given in the DT bindings describes the connector as a child
> of a PMIC, with of_graph somehow tying it to the various inputs. But in
> these examples vbus is handled by implicitly inside the MFD, where
> extcon is informed about the plug event they toggle vbus as well.
>
> In our case we have a extcon-usb-gpio to detect mode, which per Jorge's
> proposal will trickle down to the PHY and become a regulator calls on
> either some external regulator or more typically one of the chargers in
> the system.
>
>
> So if we come up with a struct device for the connector and some API for
> toggling the vbus we're going to have to fairly abstract entities
> representing pretty much the same thing - and in a design with a mux we
> would have a different setup.
I am a bit unclear - not sure if we have gone full circle on this
subject. what is then the direction to get this merged?
I did have look last week and the level of effort to support regulators
on external nodes is not neglectable meaning that I might not have the
time to deliver that feature (perhaps someone else wishes to take over?)
>
> Regards,
> Bjorn
>
Hi Jorge, Bjorn,
On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 09:18:57AM +0200, Jorge Ramirez wrote:
> On 9/4/19 01:34, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > On Tue 03 Sep 14:45 PDT 2019, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >
> >> Quoting Jack Pham (2019-09-03 10:39:24)
> >>> On Mon, Sep 02, 2019 at 08:23:04AM +0200, Jorge Ramirez wrote:
> >>>> On 8/30/19 20:28, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >>>>> Quoting Bjorn Andersson (2019-08-30 09:45:20)
> >>>>>> On Fri 30 Aug 09:01 PDT 2019, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> The USB-C connector is attached both to the HS and SS PHYs, so I think
> >>>>>>>>> you should represent this external to this node and use of_graph to
> >>>>>>>>> query it.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> but AFAICS we wont be able to retrieve the vbux-supply from an external
> >>>>>>>> node (that interface does not exist).
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> rob, do you have a suggestion?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Shouldn't the vbus supply be in the phy? Or is this a situation where
> >>>>>>> the phy itself doesn't have the vbus supply going to it because the PMIC
> >>>>>>> gets in the way and handles the vbus for the connector by having the SoC
> >>>>>>> communicate with the PMIC about when to turn the vbus on and off, etc?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> That's correct, the VBUS comes out of the PMIC and goes directly to the
> >>>>>> connector.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The additional complicating factor here is that the connector is wired
> >>>>>> to a USB2 phy as well, so we need to wire up detection and vbus control
> >>>>>> to both of them - but I think this will be fine, if we can only figure
> >>>>>> out a sane way of getting hold of the vbus-supply.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Does it really matter to describe this situation though? Maybe it's
> >>>>> simpler to throw the vbus supply into the phy and control it from the
> >>>>> phy driver, even if it never really goes there. Or put it into the
> >>>>> toplevel usb controller?
> >>>>>
> >>>> that would work for me - the connector definition seemed a better way to
> >>>> explain the connectivity but since we cant retrieve the supply from the
> >>>> external node is not of much functional use.
> >>>>
> >>>> but please let me know how to proceed. shall I add the supply back to
> >>>> the phy?
> >>
> >> So does the vbus actually go to the phy? I thought it never went there
> >> and the power for the phy was different (and possibly lower in voltage).
> >>
> >
> > No, the PHYs use different - lower voltage - supplies to operate. VBUS
> > is coming from a 5V supply straight to the connector and plug-detect
> > logic (which is passive in this design).
> >
> >>>
> >>> Putting it in the toplevel usb node makes sense to me, since that's
> >>> usually the driver that knows when it's switching into host mode and
> >>> needs to turn on VBUS. The dwc3-qcom driver & bindings currently don't
> >>> do this but there's precedent in a couple of the other dwc3 "glues"--see
> >>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/{amlogic\,dwc3,omap-usb}.txt
> >>>
> >>> One exception is if the PMIC is also USB-PD capable and can do power
> >>> role swap, in which case the VBUS control needs to be done by the TCPM,
> >>> so that'd be a case where having vbus-supply in the connector node might
> >>> make more sense.
> >>>
> >>
> >> The other way is to implement the code to get the vbus supply out of a
> >> connector. Then any driver can do the work if it knows it needs to and
> >> we don't have to care that the vbus isn't going somewhere. I suppose
> >> that would need an of_regulator_get() sort of API that can get the
> >> regulator out of there? Or to make the connector into a struct device
> >> that can get the regulator out per some generic connector driver and
> >> then pass it through to the USB controller when it asks for it. Maybe
> >> try to prototype that out?
> >>
> >
> > The examples given in the DT bindings describes the connector as a child
> > of a PMIC, with of_graph somehow tying it to the various inputs. But in
> > these examples vbus is handled by implicitly inside the MFD, where
> > extcon is informed about the plug event they toggle vbus as well.
> >
> > In our case we have a extcon-usb-gpio to detect mode, which per Jorge's
> > proposal will trickle down to the PHY and become a regulator calls on
> > either some external regulator or more typically one of the chargers in
> > the system.
Interesting you mention extcon-usb-gpio. I thought extcon at least from
bindings perspective is pass? now. Maybe this is what you need (just
landed in usb-next):
usb: common: add USB GPIO based connection detection driver
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/usb.git/commit/?h=usb-next&id=4602f3bff2669012c1147eecfe74c121765f5c56
dt-bindings: usb: add binding for USB GPIO based connection detection driver
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/usb.git/commit/?h=usb-next&id=f651c73e71f53f65e9846677d79d8e120452b59f
Fortunately this new driver might check the right boxes for you:
- usb connector binding
- ID detect GPIO
- vbus-supply regulator
With that, I think you can also keep the connector subnode out of the
SSPHY node well, and similarly get rid of the vbus toggle handling from
the PHY driver.
The big thing missing now is that this driver replaces extcon
completely, so we'll need handling in dwc3/dwc3-qcom to retrieve the
role switch state to know when host mode is entered. I saw this a while
back but don't think it got picked up:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10909981/
> > So if we come up with a struct device for the connector and some API for
> > toggling the vbus we're going to have to fairly abstract entities
> > representing pretty much the same thing - and in a design with a mux we
> > would have a different setup.
>
> I am a bit unclear - not sure if we have gone full circle on this
> subject. what is then the direction to get this merged?
>
> I did have look last week and the level of effort to support regulators
> on external nodes is not neglectable meaning that I might not have the
> time to deliver that feature (perhaps someone else wishes to take over?)
>
> >
> > Regards,
> > Bjorn
> >
>
Jack
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Quoting Jack Pham (2019-09-05 10:58:02)
> Hi Jorge, Bjorn,
>
> On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 09:18:57AM +0200, Jorge Ramirez wrote:
> > On 9/4/19 01:34, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > > On Tue 03 Sep 14:45 PDT 2019, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > >> that would need an of_regulator_get() sort of API that can get the
> > >> regulator out of there? Or to make the connector into a struct device
> > >> that can get the regulator out per some generic connector driver and
> > >> then pass it through to the USB controller when it asks for it. Maybe
> > >> try to prototype that out?
> > >>
> > >
> > > The examples given in the DT bindings describes the connector as a child
> > > of a PMIC, with of_graph somehow tying it to the various inputs. But in
> > > these examples vbus is handled by implicitly inside the MFD, where
> > > extcon is informed about the plug event they toggle vbus as well.
> > >
> > > In our case we have a extcon-usb-gpio to detect mode, which per Jorge's
> > > proposal will trickle down to the PHY and become a regulator calls on
> > > either some external regulator or more typically one of the chargers in
> > > the system.
>
> Interesting you mention extcon-usb-gpio. I thought extcon at least from
> bindings perspective is passé now. Maybe this is what you need (just
> landed in usb-next):
>
> usb: common: add USB GPIO based connection detection driver
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/usb.git/commit/?h=usb-next&id=4602f3bff2669012c1147eecfe74c121765f5c56
>
> dt-bindings: usb: add binding for USB GPIO based connection detection driver
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/usb.git/commit/?h=usb-next&id=f651c73e71f53f65e9846677d79d8e120452b59f
>
> Fortunately this new driver might check the right boxes for you:
> - usb connector binding
> - ID detect GPIO
> - vbus-supply regulator
>
> With that, I think you can also keep the connector subnode out of the
> SSPHY node well, and similarly get rid of the vbus toggle handling from
> the PHY driver.
>
> The big thing missing now is that this driver replaces extcon
> completely, so we'll need handling in dwc3/dwc3-qcom to retrieve the
> role switch state to know when host mode is entered. I saw this a while
> back but don't think it got picked up:
>
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10909981/
>
Yes this looks like the approach that should be taken. One question
though, is this a micro-b connector or a type-c connector on the board?
I thought it was a type-c, so then this USB gpio based connection driver
isn't an exact fit?
On Thu 05 Sep 22:26 PDT 2019, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Jack Pham (2019-09-05 10:58:02)
> > Hi Jorge, Bjorn,
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 09:18:57AM +0200, Jorge Ramirez wrote:
> > > On 9/4/19 01:34, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > > > On Tue 03 Sep 14:45 PDT 2019, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > >> that would need an of_regulator_get() sort of API that can get the
> > > >> regulator out of there? Or to make the connector into a struct device
> > > >> that can get the regulator out per some generic connector driver and
> > > >> then pass it through to the USB controller when it asks for it. Maybe
> > > >> try to prototype that out?
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > The examples given in the DT bindings describes the connector as a child
> > > > of a PMIC, with of_graph somehow tying it to the various inputs. But in
> > > > these examples vbus is handled by implicitly inside the MFD, where
> > > > extcon is informed about the plug event they toggle vbus as well.
> > > >
> > > > In our case we have a extcon-usb-gpio to detect mode, which per Jorge's
> > > > proposal will trickle down to the PHY and become a regulator calls on
> > > > either some external regulator or more typically one of the chargers in
> > > > the system.
> >
> > Interesting you mention extcon-usb-gpio. I thought extcon at least from
> > bindings perspective is passé now. Maybe this is what you need (just
> > landed in usb-next):
> >
> > usb: common: add USB GPIO based connection detection driver
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/usb.git/commit/?h=usb-next&id=4602f3bff2669012c1147eecfe74c121765f5c56
> >
> > dt-bindings: usb: add binding for USB GPIO based connection detection driver
> > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gregkh/usb.git/commit/?h=usb-next&id=f651c73e71f53f65e9846677d79d8e120452b59f
> >
> > Fortunately this new driver might check the right boxes for you:
> > - usb connector binding
> > - ID detect GPIO
> > - vbus-supply regulator
> >
> > With that, I think you can also keep the connector subnode out of the
> > SSPHY node well, and similarly get rid of the vbus toggle handling from
> > the PHY driver.
> >
> > The big thing missing now is that this driver replaces extcon
> > completely, so we'll need handling in dwc3/dwc3-qcom to retrieve the
> > role switch state to know when host mode is entered. I saw this a while
> > back but don't think it got picked up:
> >
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10909981/
> >
>
> Yes this looks like the approach that should be taken. One question
> though, is this a micro-b connector or a type-c connector on the board?
> I thought it was a type-c, so then this USB gpio based connection driver
> isn't an exact fit?
>
For this particular case it's a type c connector, but the port
controller is operated completely passively (and there's no PD or DP
involved), so the GPIO based approach seems like a good fit.
Regards,
Bjorn
Quoting Bjorn Andersson (2019-09-06 11:25:30)
> On Thu 05 Sep 22:26 PDT 2019, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
> >
> > Yes this looks like the approach that should be taken. One question
> > though, is this a micro-b connector or a type-c connector on the board?
> > I thought it was a type-c, so then this USB gpio based connection driver
> > isn't an exact fit?
> >
>
> For this particular case it's a type c connector, but the port
> controller is operated completely passively (and there's no PD or DP
> involved), so the GPIO based approach seems like a good fit.
>
OK. Perhaps the binding needs an update then to have another compatible
string indicating type-c connector that's not able to support PD or DP?