2019-05-04 11:49:07

by Greg Kroah-Hartman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 5.0 00/32] 5.0.13-stable review

This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.0.13 release.
There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
let me know.

Responses should be made by Mon 06 May 2019 10:24:23 AM UTC.
Anything received after that time might be too late.

The whole patch series can be found in one patch at:
https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v5.x/stable-review/patch-5.0.13-rc1.gz
or in the git tree and branch at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git linux-5.0.y
and the diffstat can be found below.

thanks,

greg k-h

-------------
Pseudo-Shortlog of commits:

Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
Linux 5.0.13-rc1

Rafael J. Wysocki <[email protected]>
ath10k: Drop WARN_ON()s that always trigger during system resume

Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
iwlwifi: mvm: properly check debugfs dentry before using it

Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
ALSA: line6: use dynamic buffers

Jim Mattson <[email protected]>
KVM: nVMX: Fix size checks in vmx_set_nested_state

Sean Christopherson <[email protected]>
KVM: x86: Whitelist port 0x7e for pre-incrementing %rip

Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
net/tls: fix copy to fragments in reencrypt

Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
net/tls: don't copy negative amounts of data in reencrypt

Michael Chan <[email protected]>
bnxt_en: Fix uninitialized variable usage in bnxt_rx_pkt().

Michael Chan <[email protected]>
bnxt_en: Fix statistics context reservation logic.

Michael Chan <[email protected]>
bnxt_en: Pass correct extended TX port statistics size to firmware.

Michael Chan <[email protected]>
bnxt_en: Fix possible crash in bnxt_hwrm_ring_free() under error conditions.

Vasundhara Volam <[email protected]>
bnxt_en: Free short FW command HWRM memory in error path in bnxt_init_one()

Michael Chan <[email protected]>
bnxt_en: Improve multicast address setup logic.

Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
udp: fix GRO packet of death

Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>
udp: fix GRO reception in case of length mismatch

Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
tcp: add sanity tests in tcp_add_backlog()

David Ahern <[email protected]>
selftests: fib_rule_tests: Fix icmp proto with ipv6

Willem de Bruijn <[email protected]>
packet: in recvmsg msg_name return at least sizeof sockaddr_ll

Willem de Bruijn <[email protected]>
packet: validate msg_namelen in send directly

Hangbin Liu <[email protected]>
selftests: fib_rule_tests: print the result and return 1 if any tests failed

Xin Long <[email protected]>
sctp: avoid running the sctp state machine recursively

David Howells <[email protected]>
rxrpc: Fix net namespace cleanup

Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>
net/tls: avoid NULL pointer deref on nskb->sk in fallback

Andrew Lunn <[email protected]>
net: phy: marvell: Fix buffer overrun with stats counters

Dan Carpenter <[email protected]>
net: dsa: bcm_sf2: fix buffer overflow doing set_rxnfc

Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
l2tp: use rcu_dereference_sk_user_data() in l2tp_udp_encap_recv()

Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
l2ip: fix possible use-after-free

Willem de Bruijn <[email protected]>
ipv6: invert flowlabel sharing check in process and user mode

Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
ipv6/flowlabel: wait rcu grace period before put_pid()

Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
ipv6: fix races in ip6_dst_destroy()

Martin KaFai Lau <[email protected]>
ipv6: A few fixes on dereferencing rt->from

Shmulik Ladkani <[email protected]>
ipv4: ip_do_fragment: Preserve skb_iif during fragmentation


-------------

Diffstat:

Makefile | 4 +-
arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h | 1 +
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 4 +-
arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 21 +++++++-
drivers/net/dsa/bcm_sf2_cfp.c | 6 +++
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c | 53 +++++++++++--------
drivers/net/phy/marvell.c | 6 ++-
drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/mac.c | 4 +-
.../net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/debugfs-vif.c | 5 ++
include/net/sctp/command.h | 1 -
net/ipv4/ip_output.c | 1 +
net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c | 13 ++++-
net/ipv4/udp_offload.c | 16 ++++--
net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c | 4 +-
net/ipv6/ip6_flowlabel.c | 22 +++++---
net/ipv6/route.c | 47 ++++++++---------
net/l2tp/l2tp_core.c | 10 ++--
net/packet/af_packet.c | 37 ++++++++-----
net/rxrpc/call_object.c | 32 ++++++------
net/sctp/sm_sideeffect.c | 29 -----------
net/sctp/sm_statefuns.c | 35 ++++++++++---
net/tls/tls_device.c | 39 ++++++++++----
net/tls/tls_device_fallback.c | 3 +-
sound/usb/line6/driver.c | 60 +++++++++++++---------
sound/usb/line6/podhd.c | 21 ++++----
sound/usb/line6/toneport.c | 24 ++++++---
tools/testing/selftests/net/fib_rule_tests.sh | 10 +++-
27 files changed, 309 insertions(+), 199 deletions(-)



2019-05-04 11:50:38

by Greg Kroah-Hartman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 5.0 20/32] bnxt_en: Improve multicast address setup logic.

From: Michael Chan <[email protected]>

[ Upstream commit b4e30e8e7ea1d1e35ffd64ca46f7d9a7f227b4bf ]

The driver builds a list of multicast addresses and sends it to the
firmware when the driver's ndo_set_rx_mode() is called. In rare
cases, the firmware can fail this call if internal resources to
add multicast addresses are exhausted. In that case, we should
try the call again by setting the ALL_MCAST flag which is more
guaranteed to succeed.

Fixes: c0c050c58d84 ("bnxt_en: New Broadcom ethernet driver.")
Signed-off-by: Michael Chan <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
@@ -8889,8 +8889,15 @@ static int bnxt_cfg_rx_mode(struct bnxt

skip_uc:
rc = bnxt_hwrm_cfa_l2_set_rx_mask(bp, 0);
+ if (rc && vnic->mc_list_count) {
+ netdev_info(bp->dev, "Failed setting MC filters rc: %d, turning on ALL_MCAST mode\n",
+ rc);
+ vnic->rx_mask |= CFA_L2_SET_RX_MASK_REQ_MASK_ALL_MCAST;
+ vnic->mc_list_count = 0;
+ rc = bnxt_hwrm_cfa_l2_set_rx_mask(bp, 0);
+ }
if (rc)
- netdev_err(bp->dev, "HWRM cfa l2 rx mask failure rc: %x\n",
+ netdev_err(bp->dev, "HWRM cfa l2 rx mask failure rc: %d\n",
rc);

return rc;


2019-05-04 18:27:51

by kernelci.org bot

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.0 00/32] 5.0.13-stable review

stable-rc/linux-5.0.y boot: 136 boots: 0 failed, 130 passed with 4 offline, 2 untried/unknown (v5.0.12-33-gc6bd3efdcefd)

Full Boot Summary: https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-rc/branch/linux-5.0.y/kernel/v5.0.12-33-gc6bd3efdcefd/
Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/stable-rc/branch/linux-5.0.y/kernel/v5.0.12-33-gc6bd3efdcefd/

Tree: stable-rc
Branch: linux-5.0.y
Git Describe: v5.0.12-33-gc6bd3efdcefd
Git Commit: c6bd3efdcefd68cc590853c50594a9fc971d93cd
Git URL: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
Tested: 76 unique boards, 24 SoC families, 14 builds out of 207

Offline Platforms:

arm:

davinci_all_defconfig:
gcc-7
dm365evm,legacy: 1 offline lab

exynos_defconfig:
gcc-7
exynos5800-peach-pi: 1 offline lab

multi_v7_defconfig:
gcc-7
exynos5800-peach-pi: 1 offline lab
stih410-b2120: 1 offline lab

---
For more info write to <[email protected]>

2019-05-04 23:55:29

by Guenter Roeck

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.0 00/32] 5.0.13-stable review

On 5/4/19 3:24 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.0.13 release.
> There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Mon 06 May 2019 10:24:23 AM UTC.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>

Build results:
total: 159 pass: 159 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 349 pass: 349 fail: 0

Guenter

2019-05-05 03:24:47

by Dan Rue

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.0 00/32] 5.0.13-stable review

On Sat, May 04, 2019 at 12:24:45PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.0.13 release.
> There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Mon 06 May 2019 10:24:23 AM UTC.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

Results from Linaro’s test farm.
Regressions detected.

Summary
------------------------------------------------------------------------

kernel: 5.0.13-rc1
git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
git branch: linux-5.0.y
git commit: c6bd3efdcefd68cc590853c50594a9fc971d93cd
git describe: v5.0.12-33-gc6bd3efdcefd
Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-5.0-oe/build/v5.0.12-33-gc6bd3efdcefd

No regressions (compared to build v5.0.11-102-g17f93022a8c9)

No fixes (compared to build v5.0.11-102-g17f93022a8c9)

Ran 25060 total tests in the following environments and test suites.

Environments
--------------
- dragonboard-410c
- hi6220-hikey
- i386
- juno-r2
- qemu_arm
- qemu_arm64
- qemu_i386
- qemu_x86_64
- x15
- x86

Test Suites
-----------
* build
* install-android-platform-tools-r2600
* kselftest
* libgpiod
* libhugetlbfs
* ltp-cap_bounds-tests
* ltp-commands-tests
* ltp-containers-tests
* ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
* ltp-cve-tests
* ltp-dio-tests
* ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
* ltp-filecaps-tests
* ltp-fs_bind-tests
* ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
* ltp-fsx-tests
* ltp-hugetlb-tests
* ltp-io-tests
* ltp-ipc-tests
* ltp-math-tests
* ltp-mm-tests
* ltp-nptl-tests
* ltp-pty-tests
* ltp-sched-tests
* ltp-securebits-tests
* ltp-syscalls-tests
* ltp-timers-tests
* perf
* spectre-meltdown-checker-test
* v4l2-compliance
* kvm-unit-tests
* ltp-fs-tests
* ltp-open-posix-tests
* kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native
* kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none

--
Linaro LKFT
https://lkft.linaro.org

2019-05-05 03:41:48

by Guenter Roeck

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.0 00/32] 5.0.13-stable review

On 5/4/19 8:05 PM, Dan Rue wrote:
> On Sat, May 04, 2019 at 12:24:45PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.0.13 release.
>> There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> let me know.
>>
>> Responses should be made by Mon 06 May 2019 10:24:23 AM UTC.
>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> Regressions detected.
>

Confusing. What are the regressions ? Below it says that there are none.

Guenter

> Summary
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> kernel: 5.0.13-rc1
> git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
> git branch: linux-5.0.y
> git commit: c6bd3efdcefd68cc590853c50594a9fc971d93cd
> git describe: v5.0.12-33-gc6bd3efdcefd
> Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-5.0-oe/build/v5.0.12-33-gc6bd3efdcefd
>
> No regressions (compared to build v5.0.11-102-g17f93022a8c9)
>
> No fixes (compared to build v5.0.11-102-g17f93022a8c9)
>
> Ran 25060 total tests in the following environments and test suites.
>
> Environments
> --------------
> - dragonboard-410c
> - hi6220-hikey
> - i386
> - juno-r2
> - qemu_arm
> - qemu_arm64
> - qemu_i386
> - qemu_x86_64
> - x15
> - x86
>
> Test Suites
> -----------
> * build
> * install-android-platform-tools-r2600
> * kselftest
> * libgpiod
> * libhugetlbfs
> * ltp-cap_bounds-tests
> * ltp-commands-tests
> * ltp-containers-tests
> * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
> * ltp-cve-tests
> * ltp-dio-tests
> * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
> * ltp-filecaps-tests
> * ltp-fs_bind-tests
> * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
> * ltp-fsx-tests
> * ltp-hugetlb-tests
> * ltp-io-tests
> * ltp-ipc-tests
> * ltp-math-tests
> * ltp-mm-tests
> * ltp-nptl-tests
> * ltp-pty-tests
> * ltp-sched-tests
> * ltp-securebits-tests
> * ltp-syscalls-tests
> * ltp-timers-tests
> * perf
> * spectre-meltdown-checker-test
> * v4l2-compliance
> * kvm-unit-tests
> * ltp-fs-tests
> * ltp-open-posix-tests
> * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native
> * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none
>

2019-05-05 07:46:45

by Greg Kroah-Hartman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.0 00/32] 5.0.13-stable review

On Sat, May 04, 2019 at 04:53:10PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 5/4/19 3:24 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.0.13 release.
> > There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
> > Responses should be made by Mon 06 May 2019 10:24:23 AM UTC.
> > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
>
> Build results:
> total: 159 pass: 159 fail: 0
> Qemu test results:
> total: 349 pass: 349 fail: 0

Thanks for testing both of these and letting me know.

greg k-h

2019-05-05 12:49:33

by Dan Rue

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.0 00/32] 5.0.13-stable review

On Sat, May 04, 2019 at 08:31:36PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 5/4/19 8:05 PM, Dan Rue wrote:
> > On Sat, May 04, 2019 at 12:24:45PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.0.13 release.
> > > There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > let me know.
> > >
> > > Responses should be made by Mon 06 May 2019 10:24:23 AM UTC.
> > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> >
> > Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> > Regressions detected.
> >
>
> Confusing. What are the regressions ? Below it says that there are none.

My mistake for dashing it off too quickly. No regressions on arm64, arm,
x86_64, and i386.

Dan

>
> Guenter
>
> > Summary
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > kernel: 5.0.13-rc1
> > git repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git
> > git branch: linux-5.0.y
> > git commit: c6bd3efdcefd68cc590853c50594a9fc971d93cd
> > git describe: v5.0.12-33-gc6bd3efdcefd
> > Test details: https://qa-reports.linaro.org/lkft/linux-stable-rc-5.0-oe/build/v5.0.12-33-gc6bd3efdcefd
> >
> > No regressions (compared to build v5.0.11-102-g17f93022a8c9)
> >
> > No fixes (compared to build v5.0.11-102-g17f93022a8c9)
> >
> > Ran 25060 total tests in the following environments and test suites.
> >
> > Environments
> > --------------
> > - dragonboard-410c
> > - hi6220-hikey
> > - i386
> > - juno-r2
> > - qemu_arm
> > - qemu_arm64
> > - qemu_i386
> > - qemu_x86_64
> > - x15
> > - x86
> >
> > Test Suites
> > -----------
> > * build
> > * install-android-platform-tools-r2600
> > * kselftest
> > * libgpiod
> > * libhugetlbfs
> > * ltp-cap_bounds-tests
> > * ltp-commands-tests
> > * ltp-containers-tests
> > * ltp-cpuhotplug-tests
> > * ltp-cve-tests
> > * ltp-dio-tests
> > * ltp-fcntl-locktests-tests
> > * ltp-filecaps-tests
> > * ltp-fs_bind-tests
> > * ltp-fs_perms_simple-tests
> > * ltp-fsx-tests
> > * ltp-hugetlb-tests
> > * ltp-io-tests
> > * ltp-ipc-tests
> > * ltp-math-tests
> > * ltp-mm-tests
> > * ltp-nptl-tests
> > * ltp-pty-tests
> > * ltp-sched-tests
> > * ltp-securebits-tests
> > * ltp-syscalls-tests
> > * ltp-timers-tests
> > * perf
> > * spectre-meltdown-checker-test
> > * v4l2-compliance
> > * kvm-unit-tests
> > * ltp-fs-tests
> > * ltp-open-posix-tests
> > * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-native
> > * kselftest-vsyscall-mode-none
> >
>

--
Linaro - Kernel Validation

2019-05-05 12:54:04

by Greg Kroah-Hartman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.0 00/32] 5.0.13-stable review

On Sun, May 05, 2019 at 07:17:48AM -0500, Dan Rue wrote:
> On Sat, May 04, 2019 at 08:31:36PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > On 5/4/19 8:05 PM, Dan Rue wrote:
> > > On Sat, May 04, 2019 at 12:24:45PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.0.13 release.
> > > > There are 32 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > let me know.
> > > >
> > > > Responses should be made by Mon 06 May 2019 10:24:23 AM UTC.
> > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > >
> > > Results from Linaro’s test farm.
> > > Regressions detected.
> > >
> >
> > Confusing. What are the regressions ? Below it says that there are none.
>
> My mistake for dashing it off too quickly. No regressions on arm64, arm,
> x86_64, and i386.

Thanks for confirming this.

greg k-h