Define new IDs for clocks used by Dynamic Memory Controller in
Exynos5422 SoC.
Acked-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <[email protected]>
---
include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5420.h | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5420.h b/include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5420.h
index 355f469943f1..02d5ac469a3d 100644
--- a/include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5420.h
+++ b/include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5420.h
@@ -60,6 +60,7 @@
#define CLK_MAU_EPLL 159
#define CLK_SCLK_HSIC_12M 160
#define CLK_SCLK_MPHY_IXTAL24 161
+#define CLK_SCLK_BPLL 162
/* gate clocks */
#define CLK_UART0 257
@@ -195,6 +196,16 @@
#define CLK_ACLK432_CAM 518
#define CLK_ACLK_FL1550_CAM 519
#define CLK_ACLK550_CAM 520
+#define CLK_CLKM_PHY0 521
+#define CLK_CLKM_PHY1 522
+#define CLK_ACLK_PPMU_DREX0_0 523
+#define CLK_ACLK_PPMU_DREX0_1 524
+#define CLK_ACLK_PPMU_DREX1_0 525
+#define CLK_ACLK_PPMU_DREX1_1 526
+#define CLK_PCLK_PPMU_DREX0_0 527
+#define CLK_PCLK_PPMU_DREX0_1 528
+#define CLK_PCLK_PPMU_DREX1_0 529
+#define CLK_PCLK_PPMU_DREX1_1 530
/* mux clocks */
#define CLK_MOUT_HDMI 640
@@ -217,6 +228,8 @@
#define CLK_MOUT_EPLL 657
#define CLK_MOUT_MAU_EPLL 658
#define CLK_MOUT_USER_MAU_EPLL 659
+#define CLK_MOUT_SCLK_SPLL 660
+#define CLK_MOUT_MX_MSPLL_CCORE_PHY 661
/* divider clocks */
#define CLK_DOUT_PIXEL 768
@@ -248,8 +261,11 @@
#define CLK_DOUT_CCLK_DREX0 794
#define CLK_DOUT_CLK2X_PHY0 795
#define CLK_DOUT_PCLK_CORE_MEM 796
+#define CLK_FF_DOUT_SPLL2 797
+#define CLK_DOUT_PCLK_DREX0 798
+#define CLK_DOUT_PCLK_DREX1 799
/* must be greater than maximal clock id */
-#define CLK_NR_CLKS 797
+#define CLK_NR_CLKS 800
#endif /* _DT_BINDINGS_CLOCK_EXYNOS_5420_H */
--
2.17.1
On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 at 11:53, Lukasz Luba <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Define new IDs for clocks used by Dynamic Memory Controller in
> Exynos5422 SoC.
>
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
> Acked-by: Chanwoo Choi <[email protected]>
> Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <[email protected]>
> ---
> include/dt-bindings/clock/exynos5420.h | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
I do not quite understand why this patch is still being resent instead
of have been applied some time ago. Are there any issues here? Or are
there any issues with the entire patchset (except some review comments
to be resolved)? If not, then this is a dependency which should go
regardless of other patches. There is no point to keep it pending...
All other changes, e.g. DTS will have to wait for more cycles till
this gets in.
Therefore either please apply this or please comment what is stopping
dependencies from being applied.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 at 14:38, Sylwester Nawrocki <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 6/14/19 14:04, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> > I do not quite understand why this patch is still being resent instead
> > of have been applied some time ago. Are there any issues here? Or are
> > there any issues with the entire patchset (except some review comments
> > to be resolved)? If not, then this is a dependency which should go
> > regardless of other patches. There is no point to keep it pending...
> > All other changes, e.g. DTS will have to wait for more cycles till
> > this gets in.
> >
> > Therefore either please apply this or please comment what is stopping
> > dependencies from being applied.
>
> Indeed the first 3 (clk) patches should not be part of the series any more,
> I have applied them few days ago - https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/6/6/554
Ahhh, I missed that. Sorry for the noise then and thanks!
Best regards,
Krzysztof
On 6/14/19 14:04, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> I do not quite understand why this patch is still being resent instead
> of have been applied some time ago. Are there any issues here? Or are
> there any issues with the entire patchset (except some review comments
> to be resolved)? If not, then this is a dependency which should go
> regardless of other patches. There is no point to keep it pending...
> All other changes, e.g. DTS will have to wait for more cycles till
> this gets in.
>
> Therefore either please apply this or please comment what is stopping
> dependencies from being applied.
Indeed the first 3 (clk) patches should not be part of the series any more,
I have applied them few days ago - https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/6/6/554