This patch fixes below warning
drivers/firmware/efi/tpm.c:78:38: warning: passing argument 1 of
‘tpm2_calc_event_log_size’ makes pointer from integer without a cast
[-Wint-conversion]
Signed-off-by: Hariprasad Kelam <[email protected]>
---
drivers/firmware/efi/tpm.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/tpm.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/tpm.c
index 74d0cd1..1d3f5ca 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/efi/tpm.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/tpm.c
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ int __init efi_tpm_eventlog_init(void)
goto out;
}
- tbl_size = tpm2_calc_event_log_size(efi.tpm_final_log
+ tbl_size = tpm2_calc_event_log_size((void *)efi.tpm_final_log
+ sizeof(final_tbl->version)
+ sizeof(final_tbl->nr_events),
final_tbl->nr_events,
--
2.7.4
(+ Jarkko, tpmdd, Matthew)
On Sat, 15 Jun 2019 at 06:02, Hariprasad Kelam
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This patch fixes below warning
>
> drivers/firmware/efi/tpm.c:78:38: warning: passing argument 1 of
> ‘tpm2_calc_event_log_size’ makes pointer from integer without a cast
> [-Wint-conversion]
>
> Signed-off-by: Hariprasad Kelam <[email protected]>
I think we already have a fix queued for this, no?
> ---
> drivers/firmware/efi/tpm.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/tpm.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/tpm.c
> index 74d0cd1..1d3f5ca 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/tpm.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/tpm.c
> @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ int __init efi_tpm_eventlog_init(void)
> goto out;
> }
>
> - tbl_size = tpm2_calc_event_log_size(efi.tpm_final_log
> + tbl_size = tpm2_calc_event_log_size((void *)efi.tpm_final_log
> + sizeof(final_tbl->version)
> + sizeof(final_tbl->nr_events),
> final_tbl->nr_events,
> --
> 2.7.4
>
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 2:55 AM Ard Biesheuvel
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> (+ Jarkko, tpmdd, Matthew)
>
> On Sat, 15 Jun 2019 at 06:02, Hariprasad Kelam
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > This patch fixes below warning
> >
> > drivers/firmware/efi/tpm.c:78:38: warning: passing argument 1 of
> > ‘tpm2_calc_event_log_size’ makes pointer from integer without a cast
> > [-Wint-conversion]
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hariprasad Kelam <[email protected]>
>
> I think we already have a fix queued for this, no?
It looks like I fixed this in "Don't duplicate events from the final
event log in the TCG2 log" rather than a separate patch - I'm fine
merging this, based on Jarkko's preferences.
On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 03:48:23PM -0700, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 2:55 AM Ard Biesheuvel
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > (+ Jarkko, tpmdd, Matthew)
> >
> > On Sat, 15 Jun 2019 at 06:02, Hariprasad Kelam
> > <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > This patch fixes below warning
> > >
> > > drivers/firmware/efi/tpm.c:78:38: warning: passing argument 1 of
> > > ‘tpm2_calc_event_log_size’ makes pointer from integer without a cast
> > > [-Wint-conversion]
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Hariprasad Kelam <[email protected]>
> >
> > I think we already have a fix queued for this, no?
>
> It looks like I fixed this in "Don't duplicate events from the final
> event log in the TCG2 log" rather than a separate patch - I'm fine
> merging this, based on Jarkko's preferences.
Right! OK, I squashed just the fix to the earlier patch. Master and
next are updated. Can you take a peek of [1] and see if it looks
legit given all the fuzz around these changes? Then I'm confident
enough to do the 5.3 PR.
[1] git://git.infradead.org/users/jjs/linux-tpmdd.git
/Jarkko
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 2:37 PM Jarkko Sakkinen
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Right! OK, I squashed just the fix to the earlier patch. Master and
> next are updated. Can you take a peek of [1] and see if it looks
> legit given all the fuzz around these changes? Then I'm confident
> enough to do the 5.3 PR.
All looks good to me. Thanks!
On Thu, 2019-06-20 at 15:00 -0700, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 2:37 PM Jarkko Sakkinen
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Right! OK, I squashed just the fix to the earlier patch. Master and
> > next are updated. Can you take a peek of [1] and see if it looks
> > legit given all the fuzz around these changes? Then I'm confident
> > enough to do the 5.3 PR.
>
> All looks good to me. Thanks!
Thank you! I'll send the PR now.
/Jarkko