In case off error, all entries should be freed from the sched list
before deleting it. For simplicity use rcu way.
Fixes: 5a781ccbd19e46 ("tc: Add support for configuring the taprio scheduler")
Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk <[email protected]>
---
Based on net/master
net/sched/sch_taprio.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/sched/sch_taprio.c b/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
index b55a82c1e1bc..4f6333035841 100644
--- a/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
+++ b/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
@@ -1451,7 +1451,8 @@ static int taprio_change(struct Qdisc *sch, struct nlattr *opt,
spin_unlock_bh(qdisc_lock(sch));
free_sched:
- kfree(new_admin);
+ if (new_admin)
+ call_rcu(&new_admin->rcu, taprio_free_sched_cb);
return err;
}
--
2.17.1
Ivan Khoronzhuk <[email protected]> writes:
> In case off error, all entries should be freed from the sched list
> before deleting it. For simplicity use rcu way.
>
> Fixes: 5a781ccbd19e46 ("tc: Add support for configuring the taprio scheduler")
> Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk <[email protected]>
> ---
Acked-by: Vinicius Costa Gomes <[email protected]>
From: Ivan Khoronzhuk <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 13:04:25 +0300
> Based on net/master
I wonder about that because:
> --- a/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
> +++ b/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
> @@ -1451,7 +1451,8 @@ static int taprio_change(struct Qdisc *sch, struct nlattr *opt,
> spin_unlock_bh(qdisc_lock(sch));
>
> free_sched:
> - kfree(new_admin);
> + if (new_admin)
> + call_rcu(&new_admin->rcu, taprio_free_sched_cb);
>
> return err;
In my tree the context around line 1451 is:
nla_nest_end(skb, sched_nest);
done:
rcu_read_unlock();
return nla_nest_end(skb, nest);
which is part of function taprio_dump().
Please respin this properly against current 'net' sources.
On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 11:41:14AM -0700, David Miller wrote:
>From: Ivan Khoronzhuk <[email protected]>
>Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 13:04:25 +0300
>
>> Based on net/master
>
>I wonder about that because:
Applies cleanly on net/master, but line num is not correct.
I've sent v2.
>
>> --- a/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
>> +++ b/net/sched/sch_taprio.c
>> @@ -1451,7 +1451,8 @@ static int taprio_change(struct Qdisc *sch, struct nlattr *opt,
>> spin_unlock_bh(qdisc_lock(sch));
>>
>> free_sched:
>> - kfree(new_admin);
>> + if (new_admin)
>> + call_rcu(&new_admin->rcu, taprio_free_sched_cb);
>>
>> return err;
>
>In my tree the context around line 1451 is:
>
> nla_nest_end(skb, sched_nest);
>
>done:
> rcu_read_unlock();
>
> return nla_nest_end(skb, nest);
>
>
>which is part of function taprio_dump().
>
>Please respin this properly against current 'net' sources.
--
Regards,
Ivan Khoronzhuk