Add calls to arch_set_freq_scale() in qcom-cpufreq-hw driver to enable
frequency invariance.
Signed-off-by: Douglas RAILLARD <[email protected]>
---
drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c | 10 +++++++++-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
index 4b0b50403901..3bd3b8b268d9 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
@@ -34,9 +34,12 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_target_index(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
unsigned int index)
{
void __iomem *perf_state_reg = policy->driver_data;
+ unsigned long freq = policy->freq_table[index].frequency;
writel_relaxed(index, perf_state_reg);
+ arch_set_freq_scale(policy->related_cpus, freq,
+ policy->cpuinfo.max_freq);
return 0;
}
@@ -63,6 +66,7 @@ static unsigned int qcom_cpufreq_hw_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
{
void __iomem *perf_state_reg = policy->driver_data;
int index;
+ unsigned long freq;
index = policy->cached_resolved_idx;
if (index < 0)
@@ -70,7 +74,11 @@ static unsigned int qcom_cpufreq_hw_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
writel_relaxed(index, perf_state_reg);
- return policy->freq_table[index].frequency;
+ freq = policy->freq_table[index].frequency;
+ arch_set_freq_scale(policy->related_cpus, freq,
+ policy->cpuinfo.max_freq);
+
+ return freq;
}
static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_read_lut(struct device *cpu_dev,
--
2.22.0
Hi Douglas,
On Thursday 08 Aug 2019 at 14:18:57 (+0100), Douglas RAILLARD wrote:
> Add calls to arch_set_freq_scale() in qcom-cpufreq-hw driver to enable
> frequency invariance.
Is there a patch 2/2 ?
>
> Signed-off-by: Douglas RAILLARD <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c | 10 +++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
> index 4b0b50403901..3bd3b8b268d9 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
> @@ -34,9 +34,12 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_target_index(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> unsigned int index)
> {
> void __iomem *perf_state_reg = policy->driver_data;
> + unsigned long freq = policy->freq_table[index].frequency;
>
> writel_relaxed(index, perf_state_reg);
>
> + arch_set_freq_scale(policy->related_cpus, freq,
> + policy->cpuinfo.max_freq);
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -63,6 +66,7 @@ static unsigned int qcom_cpufreq_hw_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> {
> void __iomem *perf_state_reg = policy->driver_data;
> int index;
> + unsigned long freq;
>
> index = policy->cached_resolved_idx;
> if (index < 0)
> @@ -70,7 +74,11 @@ static unsigned int qcom_cpufreq_hw_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>
> writel_relaxed(index, perf_state_reg);
>
> - return policy->freq_table[index].frequency;
> + freq = policy->freq_table[index].frequency;
> + arch_set_freq_scale(policy->related_cpus, freq,
> + policy->cpuinfo.max_freq);
> +
> + return freq;
> }
>
> static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_read_lut(struct device *cpu_dev,
> --
> 2.22.0
Reviewed-by: Quentin Perret <[email protected]>
Thanks,
Quentin
Hi Quentin,
On 8/8/19 6:32 PM, Quentin Perret wrote:
> Hi Douglas,
>
> On Thursday 08 Aug 2019 at 14:18:57 (+0100), Douglas RAILLARD wrote:
>> Add calls to arch_set_freq_scale() in qcom-cpufreq-hw driver to enable
>> frequency invariance.
>
> Is there a patch 2/2 ?
That slipped through when format-patch-ing unrelated commits, there is no 2nd patch.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Douglas RAILLARD <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c | 10 +++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
>> index 4b0b50403901..3bd3b8b268d9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
>> @@ -34,9 +34,12 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_target_index(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>> unsigned int index)
>> {
>> void __iomem *perf_state_reg = policy->driver_data;
>> + unsigned long freq = policy->freq_table[index].frequency;
>>
>> writel_relaxed(index, perf_state_reg);
>>
>> + arch_set_freq_scale(policy->related_cpus, freq,
>> + policy->cpuinfo.max_freq);
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -63,6 +66,7 @@ static unsigned int qcom_cpufreq_hw_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>> {
>> void __iomem *perf_state_reg = policy->driver_data;
>> int index;
>> + unsigned long freq;
>>
>> index = policy->cached_resolved_idx;
>> if (index < 0)
>> @@ -70,7 +74,11 @@ static unsigned int qcom_cpufreq_hw_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>>
>> writel_relaxed(index, perf_state_reg);
>>
>> - return policy->freq_table[index].frequency;
>> + freq = policy->freq_table[index].frequency;
>> + arch_set_freq_scale(policy->related_cpus, freq,
>> + policy->cpuinfo.max_freq);
>> +
>> + return freq;
>> }
>>
>> static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_read_lut(struct device *cpu_dev,
>> --
>> 2.22.0
>
> Reviewed-by: Quentin Perret <[email protected]>
>
> Thanks,
> Quentin
>
Thanks,
Douglas
On Friday 09 Aug 2019 at 11:16:12 (+0100), Douglas Raillard wrote:
> Hi Quentin,
>
> On 8/8/19 6:32 PM, Quentin Perret wrote:
> > Hi Douglas,
> >
> > On Thursday 08 Aug 2019 at 14:18:57 (+0100), Douglas RAILLARD wrote:
> > > Add calls to arch_set_freq_scale() in qcom-cpufreq-hw driver to enable
> > > frequency invariance.
> >
> > Is there a patch 2/2 ?
>
> That slipped through when format-patch-ing unrelated commits, there is no 2nd patch.
>
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Douglas RAILLARD <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c | 10 +++++++++-
> > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
> > > index 4b0b50403901..3bd3b8b268d9 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
> > > @@ -34,9 +34,12 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_target_index(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> > > unsigned int index)
> > > {
> > > void __iomem *perf_state_reg = policy->driver_data;
> > > + unsigned long freq = policy->freq_table[index].frequency;
> > > writel_relaxed(index, perf_state_reg);
> > > + arch_set_freq_scale(policy->related_cpus, freq,
> > > + policy->cpuinfo.max_freq);
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > > @@ -63,6 +66,7 @@ static unsigned int qcom_cpufreq_hw_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> > > {
> > > void __iomem *perf_state_reg = policy->driver_data;
> > > int index;
> > > + unsigned long freq;
> > > index = policy->cached_resolved_idx;
> > > if (index < 0)
> > > @@ -70,7 +74,11 @@ static unsigned int qcom_cpufreq_hw_fast_switch(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
> > > writel_relaxed(index, perf_state_reg);
> > > - return policy->freq_table[index].frequency;
> > > + freq = policy->freq_table[index].frequency;
> > > + arch_set_freq_scale(policy->related_cpus, freq,
> > > + policy->cpuinfo.max_freq);
> > > +
> > > + return freq;
> > > }
> > > static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_read_lut(struct device *cpu_dev,
> > > --
> > > 2.22.0
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Quentin Perret <[email protected]>
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Quentin
> >
>
> Thanks,
> Douglas
Actually, one nit, the $subject should probably be formatted as:
cpufreq: qcom-hw: invoke frequency-invariance setter function
for consistency with other patches in this area.
Thanks,
Quentin
On 09-08-19, 11:37, Quentin Perret wrote:
> Actually, one nit, the $subject should probably be formatted as:
>
> cpufreq: qcom-hw: invoke frequency-invariance setter function
>
> for consistency with other patches in this area.
Applied with these changes. Thanks.
--
viresh