2020-03-22 14:01:39

by Johan Jonker

Subject: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: fix defines in pd_vio node for rk3399

A test with the command below gives for example this error:

arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399-evb.dt.yaml: pd_vio@15:
'pd_tcpc0@RK3399_PD_TCPC0', 'pd_tcpc1@RK3399_PD_TCPC1'
do not match any of the regexes:
'.*-names$', '.*-supply$', '^#.*-cells$',
'^#[a-zA-Z0-9,+\\-._]{0,63}$',
'^[a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z0-9,+\\-._]{0,63}$',
'^[a-zA-Z][a-zA-Z0-9,+\\-._]{0,63}@[0-9a-fA-F]+(,[0-9a-fA-F]+)*$',
'^__.*__$', 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'

Fix error by replacing the wrong defines by the ones
mentioned in 'rk3399-power.h'.

make -k ARCH=arm64 dtbs_check

Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
index 8aac201f0..3dc8fe620 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
@@ -1087,12 +1087,12 @@
pm_qos = <&qos_isp1_m0>,
<&qos_isp1_m1>;
};
- pd_tcpc0@RK3399_PD_TCPC0 {
+ pd_tcpc0@RK3399_PD_TCPD0 {
reg = <RK3399_PD_TCPD0>;
clocks = <&cru SCLK_UPHY0_TCPDCORE>,
<&cru SCLK_UPHY0_TCPDPHY_REF>;
};
- pd_tcpc1@RK3399_PD_TCPC1 {
+ pd_tcpc1@RK3399_PD_TCPD1 {
reg = <RK3399_PD_TCPD1>;
clocks = <&cru SCLK_UPHY1_TCPDCORE>,
<&cru SCLK_UPHY1_TCPDPHY_REF>;
--
2.11.0

2020-03-22 15:47:25

by Johan Jonker

Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: fix defines in pd_vio node for rk3399

Hi,

The RK3399 TRM uses both

'pd_tcpc0, pd_tcpc1'

as

'pd_tcpd0, pd_tcpd1'.

What should we use here?

Thanks.

> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
> index 8aac201f0..3dc8fe620 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
> @@ -1087,12 +1087,12 @@
> pm_qos = <&qos_isp1_m0>,
> <&qos_isp1_m1>;
> };
> - pd_tcpc0@RK3399_PD_TCPC0 {
> + pd_tcpc0@RK3399_PD_TCPD0 {
> reg = <RK3399_PD_TCPD0>;
> clocks = <&cru SCLK_UPHY0_TCPDCORE>,
> <&cru SCLK_UPHY0_TCPDPHY_REF>;
> };
> - pd_tcpc1@RK3399_PD_TCPC1 {
> + pd_tcpc1@RK3399_PD_TCPD1 {
> reg = <RK3399_PD_TCPD1>;
> clocks = <&cru SCLK_UPHY1_TCPDCORE>,
> <&cru SCLK_UPHY1_TCPDPHY_REF>;
> --
> 2.11.0

2020-03-22 16:15:50

by Johan Jonker

Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: fix defines in pd_vio node for rk3399

Hi,

Why is 'pd_tcpc0, pd_tcpc1' grouped under 'pd_vio' instead of VD_LOGIC?

Thanks

On 3/22/20 4:45 PM, Johan Jonker wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The RK3399 TRM uses both
>
> 'pd_tcpc0, pd_tcpc1'
>
> as
>
> 'pd_tcpd0, pd_tcpd1'.
>
> What should we use here?
>
> Thanks.
>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
>> index 8aac201f0..3dc8fe620 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
>> @@ -1087,12 +1087,12 @@
>> pm_qos = <&qos_isp1_m0>,
>> <&qos_isp1_m1>;
>> };
>> - pd_tcpc0@RK3399_PD_TCPC0 {
>> + pd_tcpc0@RK3399_PD_TCPD0 {
>> reg = <RK3399_PD_TCPD0>;
>> clocks = <&cru SCLK_UPHY0_TCPDCORE>,
>> <&cru SCLK_UPHY0_TCPDPHY_REF>;
>> };
>> - pd_tcpc1@RK3399_PD_TCPC1 {
>> + pd_tcpc1@RK3399_PD_TCPD1 {
>> reg = <RK3399_PD_TCPD1>;
>> clocks = <&cru SCLK_UPHY1_TCPDCORE>,
>> <&cru SCLK_UPHY1_TCPDPHY_REF>;
>> --
>> 2.11.0
>

2020-03-22 18:04:33

by Heiko Stuebner

Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: fix defines in pd_vio node for rk3399

Am Sonntag, 22. M?rz 2020, 17:14:54 CET schrieb Johan Jonker:
> Hi,
>
> Why is 'pd_tcpc0, pd_tcpc1' grouped under 'pd_vio' instead of VD_LOGIC?

^^
You'll need to add Rockchip-people for that - I've done that now ;-)



> On 3/22/20 4:45 PM, Johan Jonker wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The RK3399 TRM uses both
> >
> > 'pd_tcpc0, pd_tcpc1'
> >
> > as
> >
> > 'pd_tcpd0, pd_tcpd1'.
> >
> > What should we use here?

We should probably just fix the nodename as you did.
- For one tcpD seems to be appearing way more often than tcpC
- and of course the header is part of the binding itself, so that shouldn't
change without a really good reason


Heiko

> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
> >> index 8aac201f0..3dc8fe620 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi
> >> @@ -1087,12 +1087,12 @@
> >> pm_qos = <&qos_isp1_m0>,
> >> <&qos_isp1_m1>;
> >> };
> >> - pd_tcpc0@RK3399_PD_TCPC0 {
> >> + pd_tcpc0@RK3399_PD_TCPD0 {
> >> reg = <RK3399_PD_TCPD0>;
> >> clocks = <&cru SCLK_UPHY0_TCPDCORE>,
> >> <&cru SCLK_UPHY0_TCPDPHY_REF>;
> >> };
> >> - pd_tcpc1@RK3399_PD_TCPC1 {
> >> + pd_tcpc1@RK3399_PD_TCPD1 {
> >> reg = <RK3399_PD_TCPD1>;
> >> clocks = <&cru SCLK_UPHY1_TCPDCORE>,
> >> <&cru SCLK_UPHY1_TCPDPHY_REF>;
> >
>
>