2020-03-27 03:08:30

by Qiujun Huang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v6] sctp: fix refcount bug in sctp_wfree

We should iterate over the datamsgs to move
all chunks(skbs) to newsk.

The following case cause the bug:
for the trouble SKB, it was in outq->transmitted list

sctp_outq_sack
sctp_check_transmitted
SKB was moved to outq->sacked list
then throw away the sack queue
SKB was deleted from outq->sacked
(but it was held by datamsg at sctp_datamsg_to_asoc
So, sctp_wfree was not called here)

then migrate happened

sctp_for_each_tx_datachunk(
sctp_clear_owner_w);
sctp_assoc_migrate();
sctp_for_each_tx_datachunk(
sctp_set_owner_w);
SKB was not in the outq, and was not changed to newsk

finally

__sctp_outq_teardown
sctp_chunk_put (for another skb)
sctp_datamsg_put
__kfree_skb(msg->frag_list)
sctp_wfree (for SKB)
SKB->sk was still oldsk (skb->sk != asoc->base.sk).

Reported-and-tested-by: [email protected]
Signed-off-by: Qiujun Huang <[email protected]>
---
net/sctp/socket.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/sctp/socket.c b/net/sctp/socket.c
index 1b56fc440606..f68076713162 100644
--- a/net/sctp/socket.c
+++ b/net/sctp/socket.c
@@ -147,29 +147,44 @@ static void sctp_clear_owner_w(struct sctp_chunk *chunk)
skb_orphan(chunk->skb);
}

+#define traverse_and_process() \
+do { \
+ msg = chunk->msg; \
+ if (msg == prev_msg) \
+ continue; \
+ list_for_each_entry(c, &msg->chunks, frag_list) { \
+ if ((clear && asoc->base.sk == c->skb->sk) || \
+ (!clear && asoc->base.sk != c->skb->sk)) \
+ cb(c); \
+ } \
+ prev_msg = msg; \
+} while (0)
+
static void sctp_for_each_tx_datachunk(struct sctp_association *asoc,
+ bool clear,
void (*cb)(struct sctp_chunk *))

{
+ struct sctp_datamsg *msg, *prev_msg = NULL;
struct sctp_outq *q = &asoc->outqueue;
+ struct sctp_chunk *chunk, *c;
struct sctp_transport *t;
- struct sctp_chunk *chunk;

list_for_each_entry(t, &asoc->peer.transport_addr_list, transports)
list_for_each_entry(chunk, &t->transmitted, transmitted_list)
- cb(chunk);
+ traverse_and_process();

list_for_each_entry(chunk, &q->retransmit, transmitted_list)
- cb(chunk);
+ traverse_and_process();

list_for_each_entry(chunk, &q->sacked, transmitted_list)
- cb(chunk);
+ traverse_and_process();

list_for_each_entry(chunk, &q->abandoned, transmitted_list)
- cb(chunk);
+ traverse_and_process();

list_for_each_entry(chunk, &q->out_chunk_list, list)
- cb(chunk);
+ traverse_and_process();
}

static void sctp_for_each_rx_skb(struct sctp_association *asoc, struct sock *sk,
@@ -9574,9 +9589,9 @@ static int sctp_sock_migrate(struct sock *oldsk, struct sock *newsk,
* paths won't try to lock it and then oldsk.
*/
lock_sock_nested(newsk, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
- sctp_for_each_tx_datachunk(assoc, sctp_clear_owner_w);
+ sctp_for_each_tx_datachunk(assoc, true, sctp_clear_owner_w);
sctp_assoc_migrate(assoc, newsk);
- sctp_for_each_tx_datachunk(assoc, sctp_set_owner_w);
+ sctp_for_each_tx_datachunk(assoc, false, sctp_set_owner_w);

/* If the association on the newsk is already closed before accept()
* is called, set RCV_SHUTDOWN flag.
--
2.17.1


2020-03-27 04:06:22

by Marcelo Ricardo Leitner

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] sctp: fix refcount bug in sctp_wfree

On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 11:07:51AM +0800, Qiujun Huang wrote:
> We should iterate over the datamsgs to move
> all chunks(skbs) to newsk.
>
> The following case cause the bug:
> for the trouble SKB, it was in outq->transmitted list
>
> sctp_outq_sack
> sctp_check_transmitted
> SKB was moved to outq->sacked list
> then throw away the sack queue
> SKB was deleted from outq->sacked
> (but it was held by datamsg at sctp_datamsg_to_asoc
> So, sctp_wfree was not called here)
>
> then migrate happened
>
> sctp_for_each_tx_datachunk(
> sctp_clear_owner_w);
> sctp_assoc_migrate();
> sctp_for_each_tx_datachunk(
> sctp_set_owner_w);
> SKB was not in the outq, and was not changed to newsk
>
> finally
>
> __sctp_outq_teardown
> sctp_chunk_put (for another skb)
> sctp_datamsg_put
> __kfree_skb(msg->frag_list)
> sctp_wfree (for SKB)
> SKB->sk was still oldsk (skb->sk != asoc->base.sk).
>
> Reported-and-tested-by: [email protected]
> Signed-off-by: Qiujun Huang <[email protected]>

Acked-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <[email protected]>
Thanks Qiujun.

2020-03-30 04:58:53

by David Miller

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6] sctp: fix refcount bug in sctp_wfree

From: Qiujun Huang <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 11:07:51 +0800

> We should iterate over the datamsgs to move
> all chunks(skbs) to newsk.
>
> The following case cause the bug:
> for the trouble SKB, it was in outq->transmitted list
>
> sctp_outq_sack
> sctp_check_transmitted
> SKB was moved to outq->sacked list
> then throw away the sack queue
> SKB was deleted from outq->sacked
> (but it was held by datamsg at sctp_datamsg_to_asoc
> So, sctp_wfree was not called here)
>
> then migrate happened
>
> sctp_for_each_tx_datachunk(
> sctp_clear_owner_w);
> sctp_assoc_migrate();
> sctp_for_each_tx_datachunk(
> sctp_set_owner_w);
> SKB was not in the outq, and was not changed to newsk
>
> finally
>
> __sctp_outq_teardown
> sctp_chunk_put (for another skb)
> sctp_datamsg_put
> __kfree_skb(msg->frag_list)
> sctp_wfree (for SKB)
> SKB->sk was still oldsk (skb->sk != asoc->base.sk).
>
> Reported-and-tested-by: [email protected]
> Signed-off-by: Qiujun Huang <[email protected]>

Applied and queued up for -stable, thanks.