2020-05-26 13:06:43

by Alexander Sverdlin

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] macvlan: Skip loopback packets in RX handler

From: Alexander Sverdlin <[email protected]>

Ignore loopback-originatig packets soon enough and don't try to process L2
header where it doesn't exist. The very similar br_handle_frame() in bridge
code performs exactly the same check.

This is an example of such ICMPv6 packet:

skb len=96 headroom=40 headlen=96 tailroom=56
mac=(40,0) net=(40,40) trans=80
shinfo(txflags=0 nr_frags=0 gso(size=0 type=0 segs=0))
csum(0xae2e9a2f ip_summed=1 complete_sw=0 valid=0 level=0)
hash(0xc97ebd88 sw=1 l4=1) proto=0x86dd pkttype=5 iif=24
dev name=etha01.212 feat=0x0x0000000040005000
skb headroom: 00000000: 00 7c 86 52 84 88 ff ff 00 00 00 00 00 00 08 00
skb headroom: 00000010: 45 00 00 9e 5d 5c 40 00 40 11 33 33 00 00 00 01
skb headroom: 00000020: 02 40 43 80 00 00 86 dd
skb linear: 00000000: 60 09 88 bd 00 38 3a ff fe 80 00 00 00 00 00 00
skb linear: 00000010: 00 40 43 ff fe 80 00 00 ff 02 00 00 00 00 00 00
skb linear: 00000020: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 86 00 61 00 40 00 00 2d
skb linear: 00000030: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 03 04 40 e0 00 00 01 2c
skb linear: 00000040: 00 00 00 78 00 00 00 00 fd 5f 42 68 23 87 a8 81
skb linear: 00000050: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 01 02 40 43 80 00 00
skb tailroom: 00000000: ...
skb tailroom: 00000010: ...
skb tailroom: 00000020: ...
skb tailroom: 00000030: ...

Call Trace, how it happens exactly:
...
macvlan_handle_frame+0x321/0x425 [macvlan]
? macvlan_forward_source+0x110/0x110 [macvlan]
__netif_receive_skb_core+0x545/0xda0
? enqueue_task_fair+0xe5/0x8e0
? __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x36/0x70
__netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x36/0x70
process_backlog+0x97/0x140
net_rx_action+0x1eb/0x350
? __hrtimer_run_queues+0x136/0x2e0
__do_softirq+0xe3/0x383
do_softirq_own_stack+0x2a/0x40
</IRQ>
do_softirq.part.4+0x4e/0x50
netif_rx_ni+0x60/0xd0
dev_loopback_xmit+0x83/0xf0
ip6_finish_output2+0x575/0x590 [ipv6]
? ip6_cork_release.isra.1+0x64/0x90 [ipv6]
? __ip6_make_skb+0x38d/0x680 [ipv6]
? ip6_output+0x6c/0x140 [ipv6]
ip6_output+0x6c/0x140 [ipv6]
ip6_send_skb+0x1e/0x60 [ipv6]
rawv6_sendmsg+0xc4b/0xe10 [ipv6]
? proc_put_long+0xd0/0xd0
? rw_copy_check_uvector+0x4e/0x110
? sock_sendmsg+0x36/0x40
sock_sendmsg+0x36/0x40
___sys_sendmsg+0x2b6/0x2d0
? proc_dointvec+0x23/0x30
? addrconf_sysctl_forward+0x8d/0x250 [ipv6]
? dev_forward_change+0x130/0x130 [ipv6]
? _raw_spin_unlock+0x12/0x30
? proc_sys_call_handler.isra.14+0x9f/0x110
? __call_rcu+0x213/0x510
? get_max_files+0x10/0x10
? trace_hardirqs_on+0x2c/0xe0
? __sys_sendmsg+0x63/0xa0
__sys_sendmsg+0x63/0xa0
do_syscall_64+0x6c/0x1e0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe

Signed-off-by: Alexander Sverdlin <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/macvlan.c | 4 ++++
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/macvlan.c b/drivers/net/macvlan.c
index e7289d6..7cea2fa 100644
--- a/drivers/net/macvlan.c
+++ b/drivers/net/macvlan.c
@@ -447,6 +447,10 @@ static rx_handler_result_t macvlan_handle_frame(struct sk_buff **pskb)
int ret;
rx_handler_result_t handle_res;

+ /* Packets from dev_loopback_xmit() do not have L2 header, bail out */
+ if (unlikely(skb->pkt_type == PACKET_LOOPBACK))
+ return RX_HANDLER_PASS;
+
port = macvlan_port_get_rcu(skb->dev);
if (is_multicast_ether_addr(eth->h_dest)) {
unsigned int hash;
--
2.10.2


2020-05-27 10:03:29

by David Miller

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] macvlan: Skip loopback packets in RX handler

From: Alexander A Sverdlin <[email protected]>
Date: Tue, 26 May 2020 14:27:51 +0200

> From: Alexander Sverdlin <[email protected]>
>
> Ignore loopback-originatig packets soon enough and don't try to process L2
> header where it doesn't exist. The very similar br_handle_frame() in bridge
> code performs exactly the same check.
>
> This is an example of such ICMPv6 packet:
...
> Call Trace, how it happens exactly:
> ...
> macvlan_handle_frame+0x321/0x425 [macvlan]
> ? macvlan_forward_source+0x110/0x110 [macvlan]
> __netif_receive_skb_core+0x545/0xda0
...
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Sverdlin <[email protected]>

Applied to net-next, thanks.