2020-06-18 17:53:38

by Dinghao Liu

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] [v3] dmaengine: tegra210-adma: Fix runtime PM imbalance on error

pm_runtime_get_sync() increments the runtime PM usage counter even
when it returns an error code. Thus a pairing decrement is needed on
the error handling path to keep the counter balanced.

Signed-off-by: Dinghao Liu <[email protected]>
---

Changelog:

v2: - Merge two patches that fix runtime PM imbalance in
tegra_adma_probe() and tegra_adma_alloc_chan_resources()
respectively.

v3: - Use pm_runtime_put_noidle() instead of pm_runtime_put_sync()
in tegra_adma_alloc_chan_resources().
---
drivers/dma/tegra210-adma.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma/tegra210-adma.c b/drivers/dma/tegra210-adma.c
index db58d7e4f9fe..bfa8800dfb4c 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/tegra210-adma.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/tegra210-adma.c
@@ -658,6 +658,7 @@ static int tegra_adma_alloc_chan_resources(struct dma_chan *dc)

ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(tdc2dev(tdc));
if (ret < 0) {
+ pm_runtime_put_noidle(tdc2dev(tdc));
free_irq(tdc->irq, tdc);
return ret;
}
@@ -870,7 +871,7 @@ static int tegra_adma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)

ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(&pdev->dev);
if (ret < 0)
- goto rpm_disable;
+ goto rpm_put;

ret = tegra_adma_init(tdma);
if (ret)
@@ -921,7 +922,6 @@ static int tegra_adma_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
dma_async_device_unregister(&tdma->dma_dev);
rpm_put:
pm_runtime_put_sync(&pdev->dev);
-rpm_disable:
pm_runtime_disable(&pdev->dev);
irq_dispose:
while (--i >= 0)
--
2.17.1


2020-06-18 22:02:24

by Jon Hunter

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [v3] dmaengine: tegra210-adma: Fix runtime PM imbalance on error


On 18/06/2020 11:57, Dinghao Liu wrote:
> pm_runtime_get_sync() increments the runtime PM usage counter even
> when it returns an error code. Thus a pairing decrement is needed on
> the error handling path to keep the counter balanced.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dinghao Liu <[email protected]>
> ---
>
> Changelog:
>
> v2: - Merge two patches that fix runtime PM imbalance in
> tegra_adma_probe() and tegra_adma_alloc_chan_resources()
> respectively.
>
> v3: - Use pm_runtime_put_noidle() instead of pm_runtime_put_sync()
> in tegra_adma_alloc_chan_resources().
> ---
> drivers/dma/tegra210-adma.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/tegra210-adma.c b/drivers/dma/tegra210-adma.c
> index db58d7e4f9fe..bfa8800dfb4c 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/tegra210-adma.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/tegra210-adma.c
> @@ -658,6 +658,7 @@ static int tegra_adma_alloc_chan_resources(struct dma_chan *dc)
>
> ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(tdc2dev(tdc));
> if (ret < 0) {
> + pm_runtime_put_noidle(tdc2dev(tdc));

Why noidle?

Jon

--
nvpublic

2020-06-19 02:34:05

by Dinghao Liu

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] [v3] dmaengine: tegra210-adma: Fix runtime PM imbalance on error

>
> Why noidle?
>

_noidle is enough for fixing this bug. _sync may suspend
the device beyond expectation.

Regards,
Dinghao

2020-06-20 09:57:47

by Jon Hunter

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [v3] dmaengine: tegra210-adma: Fix runtime PM imbalance on error


On 19/06/2020 02:59, [email protected] wrote:
>>
>> Why noidle?
>>
>
> _noidle is enough for fixing this bug. _sync may suspend
> the device beyond expectation.

In that case, then the other instance you are fixing with this patch is
not correct.

Jon

--
nvpublic

2020-06-21 05:36:30

by Dinghao Liu

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: Re: [PATCH] [v3] dmaengine: tegra210-adma: Fix runtime PM imbalance on error



> >>
> >> Why noidle?
> >>
> >
> > _noidle is enough for fixing this bug. _sync may suspend
> > the device beyond expectation.
>
> In that case, then the other instance you are fixing with this patch is
> not correct.
>

Fine. I will fix this soon.

Regards,
Dinghao