This adds SEQPACKET ops for loopback transport and 'seqpacket_allow()'
callback.
Signed-off-by: Arseny Krasnov <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <[email protected]>
---
net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c | 12 ++++++++++++
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c b/net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c
index a45f7ffca8c5..d38ffdbecc84 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c
@@ -63,6 +63,8 @@ static int vsock_loopback_cancel_pkt(struct vsock_sock *vsk)
return 0;
}
+static bool vsock_loopback_seqpacket_allow(void);
+
static struct virtio_transport loopback_transport = {
.transport = {
.module = THIS_MODULE,
@@ -89,6 +91,10 @@ static struct virtio_transport loopback_transport = {
.stream_is_active = virtio_transport_stream_is_active,
.stream_allow = virtio_transport_stream_allow,
+ .seqpacket_dequeue = virtio_transport_seqpacket_dequeue,
+ .seqpacket_enqueue = virtio_transport_seqpacket_enqueue,
+ .seqpacket_allow = vsock_loopback_seqpacket_allow,
+
.notify_poll_in = virtio_transport_notify_poll_in,
.notify_poll_out = virtio_transport_notify_poll_out,
.notify_recv_init = virtio_transport_notify_recv_init,
@@ -103,8 +109,14 @@ static struct virtio_transport loopback_transport = {
},
.send_pkt = vsock_loopback_send_pkt,
+ .seqpacket_allow = true
};
+static bool vsock_loopback_seqpacket_allow(void)
+{
+ return loopback_transport.seqpacket_allow;
+}
+
static void vsock_loopback_work(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct vsock_loopback *vsock =
--
2.25.1
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 03:46:39PM +0300, Arseny Krasnov wrote:
>This adds SEQPACKET ops for loopback transport and 'seqpacket_allow()'
>callback.
>
>Signed-off-by: Arseny Krasnov <[email protected]>
>Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <[email protected]>
>---
> net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
>
>diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c b/net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c
>index a45f7ffca8c5..d38ffdbecc84 100644
>--- a/net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c
>+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/vsock_loopback.c
>@@ -63,6 +63,8 @@ static int vsock_loopback_cancel_pkt(struct vsock_sock *vsk)
> return 0;
> }
>
>+static bool vsock_loopback_seqpacket_allow(void);
>+
> static struct virtio_transport loopback_transport = {
> .transport = {
> .module = THIS_MODULE,
>@@ -89,6 +91,10 @@ static struct virtio_transport loopback_transport = {
> .stream_is_active = virtio_transport_stream_is_active,
> .stream_allow = virtio_transport_stream_allow,
>
>+ .seqpacket_dequeue = virtio_transport_seqpacket_dequeue,
>+ .seqpacket_enqueue = virtio_transport_seqpacket_enqueue,
>+ .seqpacket_allow = vsock_loopback_seqpacket_allow,
>+
> .notify_poll_in = virtio_transport_notify_poll_in,
> .notify_poll_out = virtio_transport_notify_poll_out,
> .notify_recv_init = virtio_transport_notify_recv_init,
>@@ -103,8 +109,14 @@ static struct virtio_transport loopback_transport = {
> },
>
> .send_pkt = vsock_loopback_send_pkt,
>+ .seqpacket_allow = true
> };
>
>+static bool vsock_loopback_seqpacket_allow(void)
>+{
>+ return loopback_transport.seqpacket_allow;
>+}
here I think we could always return true, since we will remove
`.seqpacket_allow` from struct virtio_transport.
>+
> static void vsock_loopback_work(struct work_struct *work)
> {
> struct vsock_loopback *vsock =
>--
>2.25.1
>