2021-07-31 19:12:32

by Qingfang Deng

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [RFC net-next v2 0/4] mt7530 software fallback bridging fix

DSA core has gained software fallback support since commit 2f5dc00f7a3e,
but it does not work properly on mt7530. This patch series fixes the
issues.

DENG Qingfang (4):
net: dsa: mt7530: enable assisted learning on CPU port
net: dsa: mt7530: use independent VLAN learning on VLAN-unaware
bridges
net: dsa: mt7530: set STP state also on filter ID 1
Revert "mt7530 mt7530_fdb_write only set ivl bit vid larger than 1"

drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.h | 6 ++-
2 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

--
2.25.1



2021-07-31 19:12:56

by Qingfang Deng

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [RFC net-next v2 2/4] net: dsa: mt7530: use independent VLAN learning on VLAN-unaware bridges

Consider the following bridge configuration, where bond0 is not
offloaded:

+-- br0 --+
/ / | \
/ / | \
/ | | bond0
/ | | / \
swp0 swp1 swp2 swp3 swp4
. . .
. . .
A B C

Ideally, when the switch receives a packet from swp3 or swp4, it should
forward the packet to the CPU, according to the port matrix and unknown
unicast flood settings.

But packet loss will happen if the destination address is at one of the
offloaded ports (swp0~2). For example, when client C sends a packet to
A, the FDB lookup will indicate that it should be forwarded to swp0, but
the port matrix of swp3 and swp4 is configured to only allow the CPU to
be its destination, so it is dropped.

However, this issue does not happen if the bridge is VLAN-aware. That is
because VLAN-aware bridges use independent VLAN learning, i.e. use VID
for FDB lookup, on offloaded ports. As swp3 and swp4 are not offloaded,
shared VLAN learning with default filter ID of 0 is used instead. So the
lookup for A with filter ID 0 never hits and the packet can be forwarded
to the CPU.

In the current code, only two combinations were used to toggle user
ports' VLAN awareness: one is PCR.PORT_VLAN set to port matrix mode with
PVC.VLAN_ATTR set to transparent port, the other is PCR.PORT_VLAN set to
security mode with PVC.VLAN_ATTR set to user port.

It turns out that only PVC.VLAN_ATTR contributes to VLAN awareness, and
port matrix mode just skips the VLAN table lookup. The reference manual
is somehow misleading when describing PORT_VLAN modes. It states that
PORT_MEM (VLAN port member) is used for destination if the VLAN table
lookup hits, but actually **PORT_MEM & PORT_MATRIX** (bitwise AND of
VLAN port member and port matrix) is used instead, which means we can
have two or more separate VLAN-aware bridges with the same PVID and
traffic won't leak between them.

Therefore, to solve this, enable independent VLAN learning with PVID 0
on VLAN-unaware bridges, by setting their PCR.PORT_VLAN to fallback
mode, while leaving standalone ports in port matrix mode. The CPU port
is always set to fallback mode to serve those bridges.

During testing, it is found that FDB lookup with filter ID of 0 will
also hit entries with VID 0 even with independent VLAN learning. To
avoid that, install all VLANs with filter ID of 1.

Signed-off-by: DENG Qingfang <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.h | 4 ++-
2 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c
index 7e7e0a35e351..3876e265f844 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c
@@ -1021,6 +1021,10 @@ mt753x_cpu_port_enable(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port)
mt7530_write(priv, MT7530_PCR_P(port),
PCR_MATRIX(dsa_user_ports(priv->ds)));

+ /* Set to fallback mode for independent VLAN learning */
+ mt7530_rmw(priv, MT7530_PCR_P(port), PCR_PORT_VLAN_MASK,
+ MT7530_PORT_FALLBACK_MODE);
+
return 0;
}

@@ -1229,6 +1233,10 @@ mt7530_port_bridge_join(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
PCR_MATRIX_MASK, PCR_MATRIX(port_bitmap));
priv->ports[port].pm |= PCR_MATRIX(port_bitmap);

+ /* Set to fallback mode for independent VLAN learning */
+ mt7530_rmw(priv, MT7530_PCR_P(port), PCR_PORT_VLAN_MASK,
+ MT7530_PORT_FALLBACK_MODE);
+
mutex_unlock(&priv->reg_mutex);

return 0;
@@ -1241,16 +1249,21 @@ mt7530_port_set_vlan_unaware(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port)
bool all_user_ports_removed = true;
int i;

- /* When a port is removed from the bridge, the port would be set up
- * back to the default as is at initial boot which is a VLAN-unaware
- * port.
+ /* This is called after .port_bridge_leave when leaving a VLAN-aware
+ * bridge. Don't set standalone ports to fallback mode.
*/
- mt7530_rmw(priv, MT7530_PCR_P(port), PCR_PORT_VLAN_MASK,
- MT7530_PORT_MATRIX_MODE);
+ if (dsa_to_port(ds, port)->bridge_dev)
+ mt7530_rmw(priv, MT7530_PCR_P(port), PCR_PORT_VLAN_MASK,
+ MT7530_PORT_FALLBACK_MODE);
+
mt7530_rmw(priv, MT7530_PVC_P(port), VLAN_ATTR_MASK | PVC_EG_TAG_MASK,
VLAN_ATTR(MT7530_VLAN_TRANSPARENT) |
PVC_EG_TAG(MT7530_VLAN_EG_CONSISTENT));

+ /* Set PVID to 0 */
+ mt7530_rmw(priv, MT7530_PPBV1_P(port), G0_PORT_VID_MASK,
+ G0_PORT_VID_DEF);
+
for (i = 0; i < MT7530_NUM_PORTS; i++) {
if (dsa_is_user_port(ds, i) &&
dsa_port_is_vlan_filtering(dsa_to_port(ds, i))) {
@@ -1276,15 +1289,14 @@ mt7530_port_set_vlan_aware(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port)
struct mt7530_priv *priv = ds->priv;

/* Trapped into security mode allows packet forwarding through VLAN
- * table lookup. CPU port is set to fallback mode to let untagged
- * frames pass through.
+ * table lookup.
*/
- if (dsa_is_cpu_port(ds, port))
- mt7530_rmw(priv, MT7530_PCR_P(port), PCR_PORT_VLAN_MASK,
- MT7530_PORT_FALLBACK_MODE);
- else
+ if (dsa_is_user_port(ds, port)) {
mt7530_rmw(priv, MT7530_PCR_P(port), PCR_PORT_VLAN_MASK,
MT7530_PORT_SECURITY_MODE);
+ mt7530_rmw(priv, MT7530_PPBV1_P(port), G0_PORT_VID_MASK,
+ G0_PORT_VID(priv->ports[port].pvid));
+ }

/* Set the port as a user port which is to be able to recognize VID
* from incoming packets before fetching entry within the VLAN table.
@@ -1329,6 +1341,13 @@ mt7530_port_bridge_leave(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
PCR_MATRIX(BIT(MT7530_CPU_PORT)));
priv->ports[port].pm = PCR_MATRIX(BIT(MT7530_CPU_PORT));

+ /* When a port is removed from the bridge, the port would be set up
+ * back to the default as is at initial boot which is a VLAN-unaware
+ * port.
+ */
+ mt7530_rmw(priv, MT7530_PCR_P(port), PCR_PORT_VLAN_MASK,
+ MT7530_PORT_MATRIX_MODE);
+
mutex_unlock(&priv->reg_mutex);
}

@@ -1511,7 +1530,7 @@ mt7530_hw_vlan_add(struct mt7530_priv *priv,
/* Validate the entry with independent learning, create egress tag per
* VLAN and joining the port as one of the port members.
*/
- val = IVL_MAC | VTAG_EN | PORT_MEM(new_members) | VLAN_VALID;
+ val = IVL_MAC | VTAG_EN | PORT_MEM(new_members) | FID(1) | VLAN_VALID;
mt7530_write(priv, MT7530_VAWD1, val);

/* Decide whether adding tag or not for those outgoing packets from the
@@ -1601,9 +1620,13 @@ mt7530_port_vlan_add(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
mt7530_hw_vlan_update(priv, vlan->vid, &new_entry, mt7530_hw_vlan_add);

if (pvid) {
- mt7530_rmw(priv, MT7530_PPBV1_P(port), G0_PORT_VID_MASK,
- G0_PORT_VID(vlan->vid));
priv->ports[port].pvid = vlan->vid;
+
+ /* Only configure PVID if VLAN filtering is enabled */
+ if (dsa_port_is_vlan_filtering(dsa_to_port(ds, port)))
+ mt7530_rmw(priv, MT7530_PPBV1_P(port),
+ G0_PORT_VID_MASK,
+ G0_PORT_VID(vlan->vid));
}

mutex_unlock(&priv->reg_mutex);
@@ -1617,11 +1640,9 @@ mt7530_port_vlan_del(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
{
struct mt7530_hw_vlan_entry target_entry;
struct mt7530_priv *priv = ds->priv;
- u16 pvid;

mutex_lock(&priv->reg_mutex);

- pvid = priv->ports[port].pvid;
mt7530_hw_vlan_entry_init(&target_entry, port, 0);
mt7530_hw_vlan_update(priv, vlan->vid, &target_entry,
mt7530_hw_vlan_del);
@@ -1629,11 +1650,12 @@ mt7530_port_vlan_del(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
/* PVID is being restored to the default whenever the PVID port
* is being removed from the VLAN.
*/
- if (pvid == vlan->vid)
- pvid = G0_PORT_VID_DEF;
+ if (priv->ports[port].pvid == vlan->vid) {
+ priv->ports[port].pvid = G0_PORT_VID_DEF;
+ mt7530_rmw(priv, MT7530_PPBV1_P(port), G0_PORT_VID_MASK,
+ G0_PORT_VID_DEF);
+ }

- mt7530_rmw(priv, MT7530_PPBV1_P(port), G0_PORT_VID_MASK, pvid);
- priv->ports[port].pvid = pvid;

mutex_unlock(&priv->reg_mutex);

@@ -2134,6 +2156,10 @@ mt7530_setup(struct dsa_switch *ds)
return ret;
} else {
mt7530_port_disable(ds, i);
+
+ /* Set default PVID to 0 on all user ports */
+ mt7530_rmw(priv, MT7530_PPBV1_P(i), G0_PORT_VID_MASK,
+ G0_PORT_VID_DEF);
}
/* Enable consistent egress tag */
mt7530_rmw(priv, MT7530_PVC_P(i), PVC_EG_TAG_MASK,
@@ -2301,6 +2327,10 @@ mt7531_setup(struct dsa_switch *ds)
return ret;
} else {
mt7530_port_disable(ds, i);
+
+ /* Set default PVID to 0 on all user ports */
+ mt7530_rmw(priv, MT7530_PPBV1_P(i), G0_PORT_VID_MASK,
+ G0_PORT_VID_DEF);
}

/* Enable consistent egress tag */
diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.h b/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.h
index b19b389ff10a..a308886fdebc 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.h
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.h
@@ -148,6 +148,8 @@ enum mt7530_vlan_cmd {
#define VTAG_EN BIT(28)
/* VLAN Member Control */
#define PORT_MEM(x) (((x) & 0xff) << 16)
+/* Filter ID */
+#define FID(x) (((x) & 0x7) << 1)
/* VLAN Entry Valid */
#define VLAN_VALID BIT(0)
#define PORT_MEM_SHFT 16
@@ -247,7 +249,7 @@ enum mt7530_vlan_port_attr {
#define MT7530_PPBV1_P(x) (0x2014 + ((x) * 0x100))
#define G0_PORT_VID(x) (((x) & 0xfff) << 0)
#define G0_PORT_VID_MASK G0_PORT_VID(0xfff)
-#define G0_PORT_VID_DEF G0_PORT_VID(1)
+#define G0_PORT_VID_DEF G0_PORT_VID(0)

/* Register for port MAC control register */
#define MT7530_PMCR_P(x) (0x3000 + ((x) * 0x100))
--
2.25.1


2021-07-31 19:13:50

by Qingfang Deng

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [RFC net-next v2 3/4] net: dsa: mt7530: set STP state also on filter ID 1

As filter ID 1 is used, set STP state also on it.

Signed-off-by: DENG Qingfang <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c | 3 ++-
drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c
index 3876e265f844..38d6ce37d692 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c
@@ -1147,7 +1147,8 @@ mt7530_stp_state_set(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, u8 state)
break;
}

- mt7530_rmw(priv, MT7530_SSP_P(port), FID_PST_MASK, stp_state);
+ mt7530_rmw(priv, MT7530_SSP_P(port), FID_PST_MASK,
+ FID_PST(stp_state));
}

static int
diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.h b/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.h
index a308886fdebc..294ff1cbd9e0 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.h
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.h
@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ enum mt7530_vlan_egress_attr {

/* Register for port STP state control */
#define MT7530_SSP_P(x) (0x2000 + ((x) * 0x100))
-#define FID_PST(x) ((x) & 0x3)
+#define FID_PST(x) (((x) & 0x3) * 0x5)
#define FID_PST_MASK FID_PST(0x3)

enum mt7530_stp_state {
--
2.25.1


2021-07-31 19:14:36

by Qingfang Deng

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [RFC net-next v2 4/4] Revert "mt7530 mt7530_fdb_write only set ivl bit vid larger than 1"

This reverts commit 7e777021780e9c373fc0c04d40b8407ce8c3b5d5.

As independent VLAN learning is also used on VID 0 and 1, remove the
special case.

Signed-off-by: DENG Qingfang <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c
index 38d6ce37d692..d72e04011cc5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c
@@ -366,8 +366,7 @@ mt7530_fdb_write(struct mt7530_priv *priv, u16 vid,
int i;

reg[1] |= vid & CVID_MASK;
- if (vid > 1)
- reg[1] |= ATA2_IVL;
+ reg[1] |= ATA2_IVL;
reg[2] |= (aging & AGE_TIMER_MASK) << AGE_TIMER;
reg[2] |= (port_mask & PORT_MAP_MASK) << PORT_MAP;
/* STATIC_ENT indicate that entry is static wouldn't
--
2.25.1


2021-08-02 13:38:33

by Vladimir Oltean

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next v2 2/4] net: dsa: mt7530: use independent VLAN learning on VLAN-unaware bridges

On Sun, Aug 01, 2021 at 03:10:20AM +0800, DENG Qingfang wrote:
> Consider the following bridge configuration, where bond0 is not
> offloaded:
>
> +-- br0 --+
> / / | \
> / / | \
> / | | bond0
> / | | / \
> swp0 swp1 swp2 swp3 swp4
> . . .
> . . .
> A B C
>
> Ideally, when the switch receives a packet from swp3 or swp4, it should
> forward the packet to the CPU, according to the port matrix and unknown
> unicast flood settings.
>
> But packet loss will happen if the destination address is at one of the
> offloaded ports (swp0~2). For example, when client C sends a packet to
> A, the FDB lookup will indicate that it should be forwarded to swp0, but
> the port matrix of swp3 and swp4 is configured to only allow the CPU to
> be its destination, so it is dropped.
>
> However, this issue does not happen if the bridge is VLAN-aware. That is
> because VLAN-aware bridges use independent VLAN learning, i.e. use VID
> for FDB lookup, on offloaded ports. As swp3 and swp4 are not offloaded,
> shared VLAN learning with default filter ID of 0 is used instead. So the
> lookup for A with filter ID 0 never hits and the packet can be forwarded
> to the CPU.
>
> In the current code, only two combinations were used to toggle user
> ports' VLAN awareness: one is PCR.PORT_VLAN set to port matrix mode with
> PVC.VLAN_ATTR set to transparent port, the other is PCR.PORT_VLAN set to
> security mode with PVC.VLAN_ATTR set to user port.
>
> It turns out that only PVC.VLAN_ATTR contributes to VLAN awareness, and
> port matrix mode just skips the VLAN table lookup. The reference manual
> is somehow misleading when describing PORT_VLAN modes. It states that
> PORT_MEM (VLAN port member) is used for destination if the VLAN table
> lookup hits, but actually **PORT_MEM & PORT_MATRIX** (bitwise AND of
> VLAN port member and port matrix) is used instead, which means we can
> have two or more separate VLAN-aware bridges with the same PVID and
> traffic won't leak between them.

"traffic won't leak" is only half the story. It won't leak, but when
multiple VLAN-unaware bridges share the same FID, they are still subject
to shortcircuit attempts if the same MAC address is present in the FDB
of both bridges. This patch doesn't solve that, maybe it is worth adding
a big comment in the code itself that clarifies that FDBs between
multiple VLAN-unaware bridges, as well as between multiple VLAN-aware
bridges, are not isolated per se, only that standalone ports are placed
under a different FID compared to bridges of whatever kind.

>
> Therefore, to solve this, enable independent VLAN learning with PVID 0
> on VLAN-unaware bridges, by setting their PCR.PORT_VLAN to fallback
> mode, while leaving standalone ports in port matrix mode. The CPU port
> is always set to fallback mode to serve those bridges.
>
> During testing, it is found that FDB lookup with filter ID of 0 will
> also hit entries with VID 0 even with independent VLAN learning. To
> avoid that, install all VLANs with filter ID of 1.
>
> Signed-off-by: DENG Qingfang <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.h | 4 ++-
> 2 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c
> index 7e7e0a35e351..3876e265f844 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c
> @@ -1021,6 +1021,10 @@ mt753x_cpu_port_enable(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port)
> mt7530_write(priv, MT7530_PCR_P(port),
> PCR_MATRIX(dsa_user_ports(priv->ds)));
>
> + /* Set to fallback mode for independent VLAN learning */
> + mt7530_rmw(priv, MT7530_PCR_P(port), PCR_PORT_VLAN_MASK,
> + MT7530_PORT_FALLBACK_MODE);
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -1229,6 +1233,10 @@ mt7530_port_bridge_join(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
> PCR_MATRIX_MASK, PCR_MATRIX(port_bitmap));
> priv->ports[port].pm |= PCR_MATRIX(port_bitmap);
>
> + /* Set to fallback mode for independent VLAN learning */
> + mt7530_rmw(priv, MT7530_PCR_P(port), PCR_PORT_VLAN_MASK,
> + MT7530_PORT_FALLBACK_MODE);
> +
> mutex_unlock(&priv->reg_mutex);
>
> return 0;
> @@ -1241,16 +1249,21 @@ mt7530_port_set_vlan_unaware(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port)
> bool all_user_ports_removed = true;
> int i;
>
> - /* When a port is removed from the bridge, the port would be set up
> - * back to the default as is at initial boot which is a VLAN-unaware
> - * port.
> + /* This is called after .port_bridge_leave when leaving a VLAN-aware
> + * bridge. Don't set standalone ports to fallback mode.
> */
> - mt7530_rmw(priv, MT7530_PCR_P(port), PCR_PORT_VLAN_MASK,
> - MT7530_PORT_MATRIX_MODE);
> + if (dsa_to_port(ds, port)->bridge_dev)
> + mt7530_rmw(priv, MT7530_PCR_P(port), PCR_PORT_VLAN_MASK,
> + MT7530_PORT_FALLBACK_MODE);
> +

hmm, okay, the ordering between dsa_broadcast() and
dsa_port_switchdev_unsync_attrs() in dsa_port_bridge_leave() is a bit
awkward for you, but this looks okay.

> mt7530_rmw(priv, MT7530_PVC_P(port), VLAN_ATTR_MASK | PVC_EG_TAG_MASK,
> VLAN_ATTR(MT7530_VLAN_TRANSPARENT) |
> PVC_EG_TAG(MT7530_VLAN_EG_CONSISTENT));
>
> + /* Set PVID to 0 */
> + mt7530_rmw(priv, MT7530_PPBV1_P(port), G0_PORT_VID_MASK,
> + G0_PORT_VID_DEF);
> +
> for (i = 0; i < MT7530_NUM_PORTS; i++) {
> if (dsa_is_user_port(ds, i) &&
> dsa_port_is_vlan_filtering(dsa_to_port(ds, i))) {
> @@ -1276,15 +1289,14 @@ mt7530_port_set_vlan_aware(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port)
> struct mt7530_priv *priv = ds->priv;
>
> /* Trapped into security mode allows packet forwarding through VLAN
> - * table lookup. CPU port is set to fallback mode to let untagged
> - * frames pass through.
> + * table lookup.
> */
> - if (dsa_is_cpu_port(ds, port))
> - mt7530_rmw(priv, MT7530_PCR_P(port), PCR_PORT_VLAN_MASK,
> - MT7530_PORT_FALLBACK_MODE);
> - else
> + if (dsa_is_user_port(ds, port)) {
> mt7530_rmw(priv, MT7530_PCR_P(port), PCR_PORT_VLAN_MASK,
> MT7530_PORT_SECURITY_MODE);
> + mt7530_rmw(priv, MT7530_PPBV1_P(port), G0_PORT_VID_MASK,
> + G0_PORT_VID(priv->ports[port].pvid));
> + }
>
> /* Set the port as a user port which is to be able to recognize VID
> * from incoming packets before fetching entry within the VLAN table.
> @@ -1329,6 +1341,13 @@ mt7530_port_bridge_leave(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
> PCR_MATRIX(BIT(MT7530_CPU_PORT)));
> priv->ports[port].pm = PCR_MATRIX(BIT(MT7530_CPU_PORT));
>
> + /* When a port is removed from the bridge, the port would be set up
> + * back to the default as is at initial boot which is a VLAN-unaware
> + * port.
> + */
> + mt7530_rmw(priv, MT7530_PCR_P(port), PCR_PORT_VLAN_MASK,
> + MT7530_PORT_MATRIX_MODE);
> +
> mutex_unlock(&priv->reg_mutex);
> }
>
> @@ -1511,7 +1530,7 @@ mt7530_hw_vlan_add(struct mt7530_priv *priv,
> /* Validate the entry with independent learning, create egress tag per
> * VLAN and joining the port as one of the port members.
> */
> - val = IVL_MAC | VTAG_EN | PORT_MEM(new_members) | VLAN_VALID;
> + val = IVL_MAC | VTAG_EN | PORT_MEM(new_members) | FID(1) | VLAN_VALID;
> mt7530_write(priv, MT7530_VAWD1, val);
>
> /* Decide whether adding tag or not for those outgoing packets from the
> @@ -1601,9 +1620,13 @@ mt7530_port_vlan_add(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
> mt7530_hw_vlan_update(priv, vlan->vid, &new_entry, mt7530_hw_vlan_add);
>
> if (pvid) {
> - mt7530_rmw(priv, MT7530_PPBV1_P(port), G0_PORT_VID_MASK,
> - G0_PORT_VID(vlan->vid));
> priv->ports[port].pvid = vlan->vid;
> +
> + /* Only configure PVID if VLAN filtering is enabled */
> + if (dsa_port_is_vlan_filtering(dsa_to_port(ds, port)))
> + mt7530_rmw(priv, MT7530_PPBV1_P(port),
> + G0_PORT_VID_MASK,
> + G0_PORT_VID(vlan->vid));
> }
>
> mutex_unlock(&priv->reg_mutex);
> @@ -1617,11 +1640,9 @@ mt7530_port_vlan_del(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
> {
> struct mt7530_hw_vlan_entry target_entry;
> struct mt7530_priv *priv = ds->priv;
> - u16 pvid;
>
> mutex_lock(&priv->reg_mutex);
>
> - pvid = priv->ports[port].pvid;
> mt7530_hw_vlan_entry_init(&target_entry, port, 0);
> mt7530_hw_vlan_update(priv, vlan->vid, &target_entry,
> mt7530_hw_vlan_del);
> @@ -1629,11 +1650,12 @@ mt7530_port_vlan_del(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port,
> /* PVID is being restored to the default whenever the PVID port
> * is being removed from the VLAN.
> */
> - if (pvid == vlan->vid)
> - pvid = G0_PORT_VID_DEF;
> + if (priv->ports[port].pvid == vlan->vid) {
> + priv->ports[port].pvid = G0_PORT_VID_DEF;
> + mt7530_rmw(priv, MT7530_PPBV1_P(port), G0_PORT_VID_MASK,
> + G0_PORT_VID_DEF);
> + }
>
> - mt7530_rmw(priv, MT7530_PPBV1_P(port), G0_PORT_VID_MASK, pvid);
> - priv->ports[port].pvid = pvid;
>
> mutex_unlock(&priv->reg_mutex);
>
> @@ -2134,6 +2156,10 @@ mt7530_setup(struct dsa_switch *ds)
> return ret;
> } else {
> mt7530_port_disable(ds, i);
> +
> + /* Set default PVID to 0 on all user ports */
> + mt7530_rmw(priv, MT7530_PPBV1_P(i), G0_PORT_VID_MASK,
> + G0_PORT_VID_DEF);
> }
> /* Enable consistent egress tag */
> mt7530_rmw(priv, MT7530_PVC_P(i), PVC_EG_TAG_MASK,
> @@ -2301,6 +2327,10 @@ mt7531_setup(struct dsa_switch *ds)
> return ret;
> } else {
> mt7530_port_disable(ds, i);
> +
> + /* Set default PVID to 0 on all user ports */
> + mt7530_rmw(priv, MT7530_PPBV1_P(i), G0_PORT_VID_MASK,
> + G0_PORT_VID_DEF);
> }
>
> /* Enable consistent egress tag */
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.h b/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.h
> index b19b389ff10a..a308886fdebc 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.h
> @@ -148,6 +148,8 @@ enum mt7530_vlan_cmd {
> #define VTAG_EN BIT(28)
> /* VLAN Member Control */
> #define PORT_MEM(x) (((x) & 0xff) << 16)
> +/* Filter ID */
> +#define FID(x) (((x) & 0x7) << 1)
> /* VLAN Entry Valid */
> #define VLAN_VALID BIT(0)
> #define PORT_MEM_SHFT 16
> @@ -247,7 +249,7 @@ enum mt7530_vlan_port_attr {
> #define MT7530_PPBV1_P(x) (0x2014 + ((x) * 0x100))
> #define G0_PORT_VID(x) (((x) & 0xfff) << 0)
> #define G0_PORT_VID_MASK G0_PORT_VID(0xfff)
> -#define G0_PORT_VID_DEF G0_PORT_VID(1)
> +#define G0_PORT_VID_DEF G0_PORT_VID(0)
>
> /* Register for port MAC control register */
> #define MT7530_PMCR_P(x) (0x3000 + ((x) * 0x100))
> --
> 2.25.1
>

Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <[email protected]>

2021-08-02 13:44:55

by Vladimir Oltean

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next v2 3/4] net: dsa: mt7530: set STP state also on filter ID 1

On Sun, Aug 01, 2021 at 03:10:21AM +0800, DENG Qingfang wrote:
> As filter ID 1 is used, set STP state also on it.
>
> Signed-off-by: DENG Qingfang <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c | 3 ++-
> drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.h | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c
> index 3876e265f844..38d6ce37d692 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c
> @@ -1147,7 +1147,8 @@ mt7530_stp_state_set(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port, u8 state)
> break;
> }
>
> - mt7530_rmw(priv, MT7530_SSP_P(port), FID_PST_MASK, stp_state);
> + mt7530_rmw(priv, MT7530_SSP_P(port), FID_PST_MASK,
> + FID_PST(stp_state));
> }
>
> static int
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.h b/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.h
> index a308886fdebc..294ff1cbd9e0 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.h
> @@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ enum mt7530_vlan_egress_attr {
>
> /* Register for port STP state control */
> #define MT7530_SSP_P(x) (0x2000 + ((x) * 0x100))
> -#define FID_PST(x) ((x) & 0x3)

Shouldn't these macros have _two_ arguments, the FID and the port state?

> +#define FID_PST(x) (((x) & 0x3) * 0x5)

"* 5": explanation?

> #define FID_PST_MASK FID_PST(0x3)
>
> enum mt7530_stp_state {
> --
> 2.25.1
>

I don't exactly understand how this patch works, sorry.
Are you altering port state only on bridged ports, or also on standalone
ports after this patch? Are standalone ports in the proper STP state
(FORWARDING)?

2021-08-02 13:46:28

by Vladimir Oltean

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next v2 4/4] Revert "mt7530 mt7530_fdb_write only set ivl bit vid larger than 1"

On Sun, Aug 01, 2021 at 03:10:22AM +0800, DENG Qingfang wrote:
> This reverts commit 7e777021780e9c373fc0c04d40b8407ce8c3b5d5.
>
> As independent VLAN learning is also used on VID 0 and 1, remove the
> special case.
>
> Signed-off-by: DENG Qingfang <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c
> index 38d6ce37d692..d72e04011cc5 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.c
> @@ -366,8 +366,7 @@ mt7530_fdb_write(struct mt7530_priv *priv, u16 vid,
> int i;
>
> reg[1] |= vid & CVID_MASK;
> - if (vid > 1)
> - reg[1] |= ATA2_IVL;
> + reg[1] |= ATA2_IVL;
> reg[2] |= (aging & AGE_TIMER_MASK) << AGE_TIMER;
> reg[2] |= (port_mask & PORT_MAP_MASK) << PORT_MAP;
> /* STATIC_ENT indicate that entry is static wouldn't
> --
> 2.25.1
>

Would you mind explaining what made VID 1 special in Eric's patch in the
first place?

2021-08-02 15:34:04

by Qingfang Deng

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next v2 3/4] net: dsa: mt7530: set STP state also on filter ID 1

On Mon, Aug 02, 2021 at 04:43:36PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 01, 2021 at 03:10:21AM +0800, DENG Qingfang wrote:
> > --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.h
> > +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.h
> > @@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ enum mt7530_vlan_egress_attr {
> >
> > /* Register for port STP state control */
> > #define MT7530_SSP_P(x) (0x2000 + ((x) * 0x100))
> > -#define FID_PST(x) ((x) & 0x3)
>
> Shouldn't these macros have _two_ arguments, the FID and the port state?
>
> > +#define FID_PST(x) (((x) & 0x3) * 0x5)
>
> "* 5": explanation?
>
> > #define FID_PST_MASK FID_PST(0x3)
> >
> > enum mt7530_stp_state {
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
>
> I don't exactly understand how this patch works, sorry.
> Are you altering port state only on bridged ports, or also on standalone
> ports after this patch? Are standalone ports in the proper STP state
> (FORWARDING)?

The current code only sets FID 0's STP state. This patch sets both 0's and
1's states.

The *5 part is binary magic. [1:0] is FID 0's state, [3:2] is FID 1's state
and so on. Since 5 == 4'b0101, the value in [1:0] is copied to [3:2] after
the multiplication.

Perhaps I should only change FID 1's state.


2021-08-02 15:44:39

by Vladimir Oltean

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next v2 3/4] net: dsa: mt7530: set STP state also on filter ID 1

On Mon, Aug 02, 2021 at 11:31:29PM +0800, DENG Qingfang wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 02, 2021 at 04:43:36PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 01, 2021 at 03:10:21AM +0800, DENG Qingfang wrote:
> > > --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mt7530.h
> > > @@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ enum mt7530_vlan_egress_attr {
> > >
> > > /* Register for port STP state control */
> > > #define MT7530_SSP_P(x) (0x2000 + ((x) * 0x100))
> > > -#define FID_PST(x) ((x) & 0x3)
> >
> > Shouldn't these macros have _two_ arguments, the FID and the port state?
> >
> > > +#define FID_PST(x) (((x) & 0x3) * 0x5)
> >
> > "* 5": explanation?
> >
> > > #define FID_PST_MASK FID_PST(0x3)
> > >
> > > enum mt7530_stp_state {
> > > --
> > > 2.25.1
> > >
> >
> > I don't exactly understand how this patch works, sorry.
> > Are you altering port state only on bridged ports, or also on standalone
> > ports after this patch? Are standalone ports in the proper STP state
> > (FORWARDING)?
>
> The current code only sets FID 0's STP state. This patch sets both 0's and
> 1's states.
>
> The *5 part is binary magic. [1:0] is FID 0's state, [3:2] is FID 1's state
> and so on. Since 5 == 4'b0101, the value in [1:0] is copied to [3:2] after
> the multiplication.
>
> Perhaps I should only change FID 1's state.

Keep the patches dumb for us mortals please.
If you only change FID 1's state, I am concerned that the driver no
longer initializes FID 0's port state, and might leave that to the
default set by other pre-kernel initialization stage (bootloader?).
So even if you might assume that standalone ports are FORWARDING, they
might not be.

2021-08-02 15:52:19

by Qingfang Deng

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next v2 4/4] Revert "mt7530 mt7530_fdb_write only set ivl bit vid larger than 1"

On Mon, Aug 02, 2021 at 04:44:09PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> Would you mind explaining what made VID 1 special in Eric's patch in the
> first place?

The default value of all ports' PVID is 1, which is copied into the FDB
entry, even if the ports are VLAN unaware. So running `bridge fdb show`
will show entries like `dev sw0p0 vlan 1 self` even on a VLAN-unaware
bridge.

Eric probably thought VID 1 is the FDB of all VLAN-unaware bridges, but
that is not true. And his patch probably cause a new issue that FDB is
inaccessible in a VLAN-**aware** bridge with PVID 1.

This series sets PVID to 0 on VLAN-unaware ports, so `bridge fdb show`
will no longer print `vlan 1` on VLAN-unaware bridges, and we don't
need special case in port_fdb_{add,del} for assisted learning.

2021-08-02 16:01:04

by Qingfang Deng

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next v2 3/4] net: dsa: mt7530: set STP state also on filter ID 1

On Mon, Aug 02, 2021 at 06:42:26PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 02, 2021 at 11:31:29PM +0800, DENG Qingfang wrote:
> > The current code only sets FID 0's STP state. This patch sets both 0's and
> > 1's states.
> >
> > The *5 part is binary magic. [1:0] is FID 0's state, [3:2] is FID 1's state
> > and so on. Since 5 == 4'b0101, the value in [1:0] is copied to [3:2] after
> > the multiplication.
> >
> > Perhaps I should only change FID 1's state.
>
> Keep the patches dumb for us mortals please.
> If you only change FID 1's state, I am concerned that the driver no
> longer initializes FID 0's port state, and might leave that to the
> default set by other pre-kernel initialization stage (bootloader?).
> So even if you might assume that standalone ports are FORWARDING, they
> might not be.

The default value is forwarding, and the switch is reset by the driver
so any pre-kernel initialization stage is no more.

2021-08-02 21:01:01

by Vladimir Oltean

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next v2 4/4] Revert "mt7530 mt7530_fdb_write only set ivl bit vid larger than 1"

On Mon, Aug 02, 2021 at 11:48:38PM +0800, DENG Qingfang wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 02, 2021 at 04:44:09PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > Would you mind explaining what made VID 1 special in Eric's patch in the
> > first place?
>
> The default value of all ports' PVID is 1, which is copied into the FDB
> entry, even if the ports are VLAN unaware. So running `bridge fdb show`
> will show entries like `dev sw0p0 vlan 1 self` even on a VLAN-unaware
> bridge.
>
> Eric probably thought VID 1 is the FDB of all VLAN-unaware bridges, but
> that is not true. And his patch probably cause a new issue that FDB is
> inaccessible in a VLAN-**aware** bridge with PVID 1.
>
> This series sets PVID to 0 on VLAN-unaware ports, so `bridge fdb show`
> will no longer print `vlan 1` on VLAN-unaware bridges, and we don't
> need special case in port_fdb_{add,del} for assisted learning.

All things seriously worth mentioning in the commit message.

2021-08-02 21:02:53

by Vladimir Oltean

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next v2 3/4] net: dsa: mt7530: set STP state also on filter ID 1

On Mon, Aug 02, 2021 at 11:58:10PM +0800, DENG Qingfang wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 02, 2021 at 06:42:26PM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 02, 2021 at 11:31:29PM +0800, DENG Qingfang wrote:
> > > The current code only sets FID 0's STP state. This patch sets both 0's and
> > > 1's states.
> > >
> > > The *5 part is binary magic. [1:0] is FID 0's state, [3:2] is FID 1's state
> > > and so on. Since 5 == 4'b0101, the value in [1:0] is copied to [3:2] after
> > > the multiplication.
> > >
> > > Perhaps I should only change FID 1's state.
> >
> > Keep the patches dumb for us mortals please.
> > If you only change FID 1's state, I am concerned that the driver no
> > longer initializes FID 0's port state, and might leave that to the
> > default set by other pre-kernel initialization stage (bootloader?).
> > So even if you might assume that standalone ports are FORWARDING, they
> > might not be.
>
> The default value is forwarding, and the switch is reset by the driver
> so any pre-kernel initialization stage is no more.

So then change the port STP state only for FID 1 and resend. Any other
reason why this patch series is marked RFC? It looked okay to me otherwise.

2021-08-03 08:27:07

by Qingfang Deng

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next v2 3/4] net: dsa: mt7530: set STP state also on filter ID 1

On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 12:00:06AM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
>
> So then change the port STP state only for FID 1 and resend. Any other
> reason why this patch series is marked RFC? It looked okay to me otherwise.

Okay, will resend with that change and without RFC.

By the way, if I were to implement .port_fast_age, should I only flush
dynamically learned FDB entries? What about MDB entries?

2021-08-03 08:50:03

by Vladimir Oltean

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next v2 3/4] net: dsa: mt7530: set STP state also on filter ID 1

On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 04:23:16PM +0800, DENG Qingfang wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 03, 2021 at 12:00:06AM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote:
> >
> > So then change the port STP state only for FID 1 and resend. Any other
> > reason why this patch series is marked RFC? It looked okay to me otherwise.
>
> Okay, will resend with that change and without RFC.
>
> By the way, if I were to implement .port_fast_age, should I only flush
> dynamically learned FDB entries? What about MDB entries?

Yes, only dynamically learned entries. That should also answer the
question about MDB entries, since a multicast address should never be a
source MAC address so they should never be dynamically learned.
The bridge should handle the deletion of static entries when needed.