2021-11-02 12:12:48

by Mark-PK Tsai

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] remoteproc: use %d format string to print return error code

Use %d format string to print return error code which
make the error message easier to understand.

Signed-off-by: Mark-PK Tsai <[email protected]>
---
drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index 502b6604b757..c5cc7f30f06e 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -575,7 +575,7 @@ static int rproc_handle_vdev(struct rproc *rproc, void *ptr,
dma_get_mask(rproc->dev.parent));
if (ret) {
dev_warn(dev,
- "Failed to set DMA mask %llx. Trying to continue... %x\n",
+ "Failed to set DMA mask %llx. Trying to continue... %d\n",
dma_get_mask(rproc->dev.parent), ret);
}

--
2.18.0


2021-11-02 12:14:27

by Russell King (Oracle)

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: use %d format string to print return error code

On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 08:08:05PM +0800, Mark-PK Tsai wrote:
> Use %d format string to print return error code which
> make the error message easier to understand.

Even better, if you use %pe after converting "ret" to a pointer via
ERR_PTR(ret), when the kernel is appropriately configured, the kernel
will give a textual version of the error code, which is even easier!

--
RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTP is here! 40Mbps down 10Mbps up. Decent connectivity at last!

2021-11-02 14:08:45

by Mark-PK Tsai

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remoteproc: use %d format string to print return error code

> On Tue, Nov 02, 2021 at 08:08:05PM +0800, Mark-PK Tsai wrote:
> > Use %d format string to print return error code which
> > make the error message easier to understand.
>
> Even better, if you use %pe after converting "ret" to a pointer via
> ERR_PTR(ret), when the kernel is appropriately configured, the kernel
> will give a textual version of the error code, which is even easier!

Thanks for the suggestion!
I will use it in v2.