The return value of devm_clk_get() needs to be checked.
To avoid use of error pointer in case of the failure of alloc.
Therefore, we should use the IS_ERR() to check the error pointer and
return -ENOMEM if it is and 0 if not.
Also, we deal with the return value in init_scp.
Fixes: 6078c651947a ("soc: mediatek: Refine scpsys to support multiple platform")
Signed-off-by: Jiasheng Jiang <[email protected]>
---
drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c | 14 ++++++++++----
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
index ca75b14931ec..778d6ffc42b8 100644
--- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
+++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-scpsys.c
@@ -411,12 +411,16 @@ static int scpsys_power_off(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd)
return ret;
}
-static void init_clks(struct platform_device *pdev, struct clk **clk)
+static int init_clks(struct platform_device *pdev, struct clk **clk)
{
int i;
- for (i = CLK_NONE + 1; i < CLK_MAX; i++)
+ for (i = CLK_NONE + 1; i < CLK_MAX; i++) {
clk[i] = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, clk_names[i]);
+ if (IS_ERR(clk[i]))
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ }
+ return 0;
}
static struct scp *init_scp(struct platform_device *pdev,
@@ -426,7 +430,7 @@ static struct scp *init_scp(struct platform_device *pdev,
{
struct genpd_onecell_data *pd_data;
struct resource *res;
- int i, j;
+ int i, j, ret;
struct scp *scp;
struct clk *clk[CLK_MAX];
@@ -481,7 +485,9 @@ static struct scp *init_scp(struct platform_device *pdev,
pd_data->num_domains = num;
- init_clks(pdev, clk);
+ ret = init_clks(pdev, clk);
+ if (ret)
+ return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
struct scp_domain *scpd = &scp->domains[i];
--
2.25.1
On Fri, Dec 17, 2021 at 11:20:44PM +0800, Jiasheng Jiang wrote:
> The return value of devm_clk_get() needs to be checked.
> To avoid use of error pointer in case of the failure of alloc.
Please don't ignore review comments, people are generally making them
for a reason and are likely to have the same concerns if issues remain
unaddressed. Having to repeat the same comments can get repetitive and
make people question the value of time spent reviewing. If you disagree
with the review comments that's fine but you need to reply and discuss
your concerns so that the reviewer can understand your decisions.
I'm getting really annoyed with this...