On Wed, Mar 02, 2022 at 12:35:02PM +0800, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
>> +disable_xck:
>> + clk_disable(clock->xck);
>> +disable_ick:
>> + clk_disable(clock->ick);
>> +err:
>> + return ret;
>> }
>
> I think disable_ick() / disable_xck() order are inverted ?
Thanks, I will submit a v3 to solve it.
Jiang