2022-05-05 08:34:54

by Qin Jian

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] dt-bindings: arm: sunplus: Add bindings for Sunplus SP7021 SoC boards

This introduces bindings for boards based Sunplus SP7021 SoC.

This patch is separated from the patch series:
Add Sunplus SP7021 SoC Support. [1]
To simply thing, I extract it from the original and resend this patch.

Previous changelog: [1]

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/

Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Qin Jian <[email protected]>
---
.../bindings/arm/sunplus,sp7021.yaml | 28 +++++++++++++++++++
MAINTAINERS | 7 +++++
2 files changed, 35 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunplus,sp7021.yaml

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunplus,sp7021.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunplus,sp7021.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..ef48fb270
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunplus,sp7021.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
+# Copyright (C) Sunplus Co., Ltd. 2021
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/arm/sunplus,sp7021.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: Sunplus SP7021 Boards Device Tree Bindings
+
+maintainers:
+ - qinjian <[email protected]>
+
+description: |
+ ARM platforms using Sunplus SP7021, an ARM Cortex A7 (4-cores) based SoC.
+ Wiki: https://sunplus-tibbo.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/doc/overview
+
+properties:
+ $nodename:
+ const: '/'
+ compatible:
+ items:
+ - enum:
+ - sunplus,sp7021-achip
+ - const: sunplus,sp7021
+
+additionalProperties: true
+
+...
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index cd0f68d4a..8b5e2e639 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -2738,6 +2738,13 @@ F: drivers/clocksource/armv7m_systick.c
N: stm32
N: stm

+ARM/SUNPLUS SP7021 SOC SUPPORT
+M: Qin Jian <[email protected]>
+L: [email protected] (moderated for mon-subscribers)
+S: Maintained
+W: https://sunplus-tibbo.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/doc/overview
+F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/sunplus,sp7021.yaml
+
ARM/Synaptics SoC support
M: Jisheng Zhang <[email protected]>
M: Sebastian Hesselbarth <[email protected]>
--
2.33.1



2022-05-07 12:21:02

by Qin Jian

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: RE: [PATCH] dt-bindings: arm: sunplus: Add bindings for Sunplus SP7021 SoC boards

Thanks for your reply, I'll keep updating the original patch series.
Please ignore this patch.


Best regards,
----------------------------------------------
覃健 QinJian
SunMedia Technology(Chengdu)Co.,Ltd
凌阳成芯科技(成都)有限公司
Tel:86-28-87848688 EXT 5476
Fax:86-28-87848686
----------------------------------------------


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rob Herring <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, May 6, 2022 6:34 AM
> To: qinjian[覃健] <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: arm: sunplus: Add bindings for Sunplus SP7021 SoC boards
>
> On Thu, May 05, 2022 at 02:44:30PM +0800, Qin Jian wrote:
> > This introduces bindings for boards based Sunplus SP7021 SoC.
> >
> > This patch is separated from the patch series:
> > Add Sunplus SP7021 SoC Support. [1]
> > To simply thing, I extract it from the original and resend this patch.
>
> This information doesn't belong in the commit msg. You should put
> context like this below the '---'.
>
> Who suggested splitting this out? Normally, new SoC families series are
> applied as a whole by the SoC maintainers (Arnd/Olof).
>
> Rob

2022-05-09 06:46:33

by Rob Herring (Arm)

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: arm: sunplus: Add bindings for Sunplus SP7021 SoC boards

On Thu, May 05, 2022 at 02:44:30PM +0800, Qin Jian wrote:
> This introduces bindings for boards based Sunplus SP7021 SoC.
>
> This patch is separated from the patch series:
> Add Sunplus SP7021 SoC Support. [1]
> To simply thing, I extract it from the original and resend this patch.

This information doesn't belong in the commit msg. You should put
context like this below the '---'.

Who suggested splitting this out? Normally, new SoC families series are
applied as a whole by the SoC maintainers (Arnd/Olof).

Rob