The double `hush' in the comment in line 1186 is repeated. Remove one
of them from the comment.
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <[email protected]>
---
arch/sparc/mm/srmmu.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/sparc/mm/srmmu.c b/arch/sparc/mm/srmmu.c
index a9aa6a92c7fe..da6fd141662b 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/mm/srmmu.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/mm/srmmu.c
@@ -1183,7 +1183,7 @@ static void __init init_swift(void)
srmmu_modtype = Swift_lots_o_bugs;
hwbug_bitmask |= (HWBUG_KERN_ACCBROKEN | HWBUG_KERN_CBITBROKEN);
/*
- * Gee george, I wonder why Sun is so hush hush about
+ * Gee george, I wonder why Sun is so hush about
* this hardware bug... really braindamage stuff going
* on here. However I think we can find a way to avoid
* all of the workaround overhead under Linux. Basically,
--
2.35.1
On Sun, 2022-05-08 at 10:43 +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> The double `hush' in the comment in line 1186 is repeated. Remove one
> of them from the comment.
[]
> diff --git a/arch/sparc/mm/srmmu.c b/arch/sparc/mm/srmmu.c
[]
> @@ -1183,7 +1183,7 @@ static void __init init_swift(void)
> srmmu_modtype = Swift_lots_o_bugs;
> hwbug_bitmask |= (HWBUG_KERN_ACCBROKEN | HWBUG_KERN_CBITBROKEN);
> /*
> - * Gee george, I wonder why Sun is so hush hush about
> + * Gee george, I wonder why Sun is so hush about
This is not really a repeated word.
do a google search on "hush hush"
It _might_ sometimes use a dash, like 'hush-hush'