This fixes mis-applied changes from commit 72b1e03aa725 ("cgroup:
account for memory_localevents in test_memcg_oom_group_leaf_events()").
Signed-off-by: Michal Koutný <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: David Vernet <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <[email protected]>
---
.../selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c | 25 +++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c
index 6ab94317c87b..c012db9d07d6 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/cgroup/test_memcontrol.c
@@ -1241,7 +1241,16 @@ static int test_memcg_oom_group_leaf_events(const char *root)
if (cg_read_key_long(child, "memory.events", "oom_kill ") <= 0)
goto cleanup;
- if (cg_read_key_long(parent, "memory.events", "oom_kill ") <= 0)
+ parent_oom_events = cg_read_key_long(
+ parent, "memory.events", "oom_kill ");
+ /*
+ * If memory_localevents is not enabled (the default), the parent should
+ * count OOM events in its children groups. Otherwise, it should not
+ * have observed any events.
+ */
+ if (has_localevents && parent_oom_events != 0)
+ goto cleanup;
+ else if (!has_localevents && parent_oom_events <= 0)
goto cleanup;
ret = KSFT_PASS;
@@ -1349,20 +1358,14 @@ static int test_memcg_oom_group_score_events(const char *root)
if (!cg_run(memcg, alloc_anon, (void *)MB(100)))
goto cleanup;
- parent_oom_events = cg_read_key_long(
- parent, "memory.events", "oom_kill ");
- /*
- * If memory_localevents is not enabled (the default), the parent should
- * count OOM events in its children groups. Otherwise, it should not
- * have observed any events.
- */
- if ((has_localevents && parent_oom_events == 0) ||
- parent_oom_events > 0)
- ret = KSFT_PASS;
+ if (cg_read_key_long(memcg, "memory.events", "oom_kill ") != 3)
+ goto cleanup;
if (kill(safe_pid, SIGKILL))
goto cleanup;
+ ret = KSFT_PASS;
+
cleanup:
if (memcg)
cg_destroy(memcg);
--
2.35.3
On 5/18/22 9:18 PM, Michal Koutný wrote:
> This fixes mis-applied changes from commit 72b1e03aa725 ("cgroup:
> account for memory_localevents in test_memcg_oom_group_leaf_events()").
Shouldn't the Fixes tag be added here and in 2/5 patch?
--
Muhammad Usama Anjum
On Sat, May 21, 2022 at 07:11:01PM +0500, Muhammad Usama Anjum <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 5/18/22 9:18 PM, Michal Koutn? wrote:
> > This fixes mis-applied changes from commit 72b1e03aa725 ("cgroup:
> > account for memory_localevents in test_memcg_oom_group_leaf_events()").
> Shouldn't the Fixes tag be added here and in 2/5 patch?
Ad the patch 1/5 -- yes, sounds appropriate.
Ad the patch 2/5 -- that's an effective revert, I don't see reverts
being marked with Fixes.
I see the patch 5/5 didn't make it to MLs (their public archives, except
for LKML). So I'll resend the series with the modified commit message
(if nothing else pops up).
Michal