2022-07-12 16:26:55

by Mauro Carvalho Chehab

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v5 0/2] Fix TLB invalidate issues with Broadwell

i915 selftest hangcheck is causing the i915 driver timeouts, as reported
by Intel CI bot:

http://gfx-ci.fi.intel.com/cibuglog-ng/issuefilterassoc/24297?query_key=42a999f48fa6ecce068bc8126c069be7c31153b4

When such test runs, the only output is:

[ 68.811639] i915: Performing live selftests with st_random_seed=0xe138eac7 st_timeout=500
[ 68.811792] i915: Running hangcheck
[ 68.811859] i915: Running intel_hangcheck_live_selftests/igt_hang_sanitycheck
[ 68.816910] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] Cannot find any crtc or sizes
[ 68.841597] i915: Running intel_hangcheck_live_selftests/igt_reset_nop
[ 69.346347] igt_reset_nop: 80 resets
[ 69.362695] i915: Running intel_hangcheck_live_selftests/igt_reset_nop_engine
[ 69.863559] igt_reset_nop_engine(rcs0): 709 resets
[ 70.364924] igt_reset_nop_engine(bcs0): 903 resets
[ 70.866005] igt_reset_nop_engine(vcs0): 659 resets
[ 71.367934] igt_reset_nop_engine(vcs1): 549 resets
[ 71.869259] igt_reset_nop_engine(vecs0): 553 resets
[ 71.882592] i915: Running intel_hangcheck_live_selftests/igt_reset_idle_engine
[ 72.383554] rcs0: Completed 16605 idle resets
[ 72.884599] bcs0: Completed 18641 idle resets
[ 73.385592] vcs0: Completed 17517 idle resets
[ 73.886658] vcs1: Completed 15474 idle resets
[ 74.387600] vecs0: Completed 17983 idle resets
[ 74.387667] i915: Running intel_hangcheck_live_selftests/igt_reset_active_engine
[ 74.889017] rcs0: Completed 747 active resets
[ 75.174240] intel_engine_reset(bcs0) failed, err:-110
[ 75.174301] bcs0: Completed 525 active resets

After that, the machine just silently hangs.

Bisecting the issue, the patch that introduced the regression is:

7938d61591d3 ("drm/i915: Flush TLBs before releasing backing store")

Reverting it fix the issues, but introduce other problems, as TLB
won't be invalidated anymore. So, instead, let's fix the root cause.

It turns that the TLB flush logic ends conflicting with i915 reset,
which is called during selftest hangcheck. So, the TLB cache should
be serialized together with i915 reset.

Tested on an Intel NUC5i7RYB with an i7-5557U Broadwell CPU.

v5:
- Added a missing SoB on patch 2.
- No other changes.

v4:
- No functional changes. All changes are at the patch descriptions:
- collected acked-by/reviewed-by;
- use the same e-mail on Author and SoB on patch 1.

v3:
- Removed the logic that would check if the engine is awake before doing
TLB flush invalidation as backporting PM logic up to Kernel 4.x could be
too painful. After getting this one merged, I'll submit a separate patch
with the PM awake logic.

v2:

- Reduced to bare minimum fixes, as this shoud be backported deeply
into stable.

Chris Wilson (2):
drm/i915/gt: Serialize GRDOM access between multiple engine resets
drm/i915/gt: Serialize TLB invalidates with GT resets

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c | 15 ++++++++++-
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

--
2.36.1



2022-07-12 16:28:49

by Mauro Carvalho Chehab

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v5 1/2] drm/i915/gt: Serialize GRDOM access between multiple engine resets

From: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>

Don't allow two engines to be reset in parallel, as they would both
try to select a reset bit (and send requests to common registers)
and wait on that register, at the same time. Serialize control of
the reset requests/acks using the uncore->lock, which will also ensure
that no other GT state changes at the same time as the actual reset.

Cc: [email protected] # v4.4 and upper
Reported-by: Mika Kuoppala <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Mika Kuoppala <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Thomas Hellström <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[email protected]>
---

See [PATCH v5 0/2] at: https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset.c
index a5338c3fde7a..c68d36fb5bbd 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset.c
@@ -300,9 +300,9 @@ static int gen6_hw_domain_reset(struct intel_gt *gt, u32 hw_domain_mask)
return err;
}

-static int gen6_reset_engines(struct intel_gt *gt,
- intel_engine_mask_t engine_mask,
- unsigned int retry)
+static int __gen6_reset_engines(struct intel_gt *gt,
+ intel_engine_mask_t engine_mask,
+ unsigned int retry)
{
struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
u32 hw_mask;
@@ -321,6 +321,20 @@ static int gen6_reset_engines(struct intel_gt *gt,
return gen6_hw_domain_reset(gt, hw_mask);
}

+static int gen6_reset_engines(struct intel_gt *gt,
+ intel_engine_mask_t engine_mask,
+ unsigned int retry)
+{
+ unsigned long flags;
+ int ret;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&gt->uncore->lock, flags);
+ ret = __gen6_reset_engines(gt, engine_mask, retry);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gt->uncore->lock, flags);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
static struct intel_engine_cs *find_sfc_paired_vecs_engine(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
{
int vecs_id;
@@ -487,9 +501,9 @@ static void gen11_unlock_sfc(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
rmw_clear_fw(uncore, sfc_lock.lock_reg, sfc_lock.lock_bit);
}

-static int gen11_reset_engines(struct intel_gt *gt,
- intel_engine_mask_t engine_mask,
- unsigned int retry)
+static int __gen11_reset_engines(struct intel_gt *gt,
+ intel_engine_mask_t engine_mask,
+ unsigned int retry)
{
struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
intel_engine_mask_t tmp;
@@ -583,8 +597,11 @@ static int gen8_reset_engines(struct intel_gt *gt,
struct intel_engine_cs *engine;
const bool reset_non_ready = retry >= 1;
intel_engine_mask_t tmp;
+ unsigned long flags;
int ret;

+ spin_lock_irqsave(&gt->uncore->lock, flags);
+
for_each_engine_masked(engine, gt, engine_mask, tmp) {
ret = gen8_engine_reset_prepare(engine);
if (ret && !reset_non_ready)
@@ -612,17 +629,19 @@ static int gen8_reset_engines(struct intel_gt *gt,
* This is best effort, so ignore any error from the initial reset.
*/
if (IS_DG2(gt->i915) && engine_mask == ALL_ENGINES)
- gen11_reset_engines(gt, gt->info.engine_mask, 0);
+ __gen11_reset_engines(gt, gt->info.engine_mask, 0);

if (GRAPHICS_VER(gt->i915) >= 11)
- ret = gen11_reset_engines(gt, engine_mask, retry);
+ ret = __gen11_reset_engines(gt, engine_mask, retry);
else
- ret = gen6_reset_engines(gt, engine_mask, retry);
+ ret = __gen6_reset_engines(gt, engine_mask, retry);

skip_reset:
for_each_engine_masked(engine, gt, engine_mask, tmp)
gen8_engine_reset_cancel(engine);

+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&gt->uncore->lock, flags);
+
return ret;
}

--
2.36.1

2022-09-16 18:34:16

by Paul Gortmaker

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/2] Fix TLB invalidate issues with Broadwell [preempt-rt regression]

[[PATCH v5 0/2] Fix TLB invalidate issues with Broadwell] On 12/07/2022 (Tue 16:21) Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:

> i915 selftest hangcheck is causing the i915 driver timeouts, as reported
> by Intel CI bot:
>
> http://gfx-ci.fi.intel.com/cibuglog-ng/issuefilterassoc/24297?query_key=42a999f48fa6ecce068bc8126c069be7c31153b4

[...]

> After that, the machine just silently hangs.
>
> Bisecting the issue, the patch that introduced the regression is:
>
> 7938d61591d3 ("drm/i915: Flush TLBs before releasing backing store")
>
> Reverting it fix the issues, but introduce other problems, as TLB
> won't be invalidated anymore. So, instead, let's fix the root cause.
>
> It turns that the TLB flush logic ends conflicting with i915 reset,
> which is called during selftest hangcheck. So, the TLB cache should
> be serialized together with i915 reset.
>
> Tested on an Intel NUC5i7RYB with an i7-5557U Broadwell CPU.

It turns out that this breaks PM-suspend operations on preempt-rt, on
multiple versions, due to all the linux-stable backports. This happens
because the uncore->lock is now used in atomic contexts.

As the uncore->lock is widely used, conversion to a raw lock seems
inappropriate at 1st glance, and hence some alternate solution will
likely be required.

Below is an example of the regression on v5.15-rt, with backport:

commit 0ee5874dad61d2b154a9e3db196fc33e8208ce1b
Author: Chris Wilson <[email protected]>
Date: Tue Jul 12 16:21:32 2022 +0100

drm/i915/gt: Serialize GRDOM access between multiple engine resets

[ Upstream commit b24dcf1dc507f69ed3b5c66c2b6a0209ae80d4d4 ]

Reverting the engine reset serialization change avoids the PM-suspend
regression and is a temporary workaround for -rt users, but of course
leaves this original TLB issue exposed.

BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/spinlock_rt.c:46
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 0, non_block: 0, pid: 45092, name: kworker/u8:4
preempt_count: 1, expected: 0
RCU nest depth: 0, expected: 0
INFO: lockdep is turned off.
Preemption disabled at:
[<ffffffffc0636522>] __intel_gt_reset+0x92/0x100 [i915]
CPU: 3 PID: 45092 Comm: kworker/u8:4 Tainted: G W O 5.15.59-rt48-preempt-rt #1
Hardware name: Intel(R) Client Systems NUC7i5DNKE/NUC7i5DNB, BIOS DNKBLi5v.86A.0064.2019.0523.1933 05/23/2019
Workqueue: events_unbound async_run_entry_fn
Call Trace:
<TASK>
show_stack+0x52/0x5c
dump_stack_lvl+0x5b/0x86
dump_stack+0x10/0x16
__might_resched.cold+0xf7/0x12f
? __gen6_reset_engines.constprop.0+0x80/0x80 [i915]
rt_spin_lock+0x4e/0xf0
? gen8_reset_engines+0x2e/0x1e0 [i915]
gen8_reset_engines+0x2e/0x1e0 [i915]
? __gen6_reset_engines.constprop.0+0x80/0x80 [i915]
__intel_gt_reset+0x9d/0x100 [i915]
gt_sanitize+0x16c/0x190 [i915]
intel_gt_suspend_late+0x3d/0xc0 [i915]
i915_gem_suspend_late+0x57/0x130 [i915]
i915_drm_suspend_late+0x38/0x110 [i915]
i915_pm_suspend_late+0x1d/0x30 [i915]
pm_generic_suspend_late+0x28/0x40
pci_pm_suspend_late+0x37/0x50
? pci_pm_poweroff_late+0x50/0x50
dpm_run_callback.cold+0x3c/0xa8
__device_suspend_late+0xa4/0x1e0
async_suspend_late+0x20/0xa0
async_run_entry_fn+0x28/0xc0
process_one_work+0x239/0x6c0
worker_thread+0x58/0x3e0
kthread+0x1a9/0x1d0
? process_one_work+0x6c0/0x6c0
? set_kthread_struct+0x50/0x50
ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
</TASK>
PM: late suspend of devices complete after 26.497 msecs

Paul.
--

>
> v5:
> - Added a missing SoB on patch 2.
> - No other changes.
>
> v4:
> - No functional changes. All changes are at the patch descriptions:
> - collected acked-by/reviewed-by;
> - use the same e-mail on Author and SoB on patch 1.
>
> v3:
> - Removed the logic that would check if the engine is awake before doing
> TLB flush invalidation as backporting PM logic up to Kernel 4.x could be
> too painful. After getting this one merged, I'll submit a separate patch
> with the PM awake logic.
>
> v2:
>
> - Reduced to bare minimum fixes, as this shoud be backported deeply
> into stable.
>
> Chris Wilson (2):
> drm/i915/gt: Serialize GRDOM access between multiple engine resets
> drm/i915/gt: Serialize TLB invalidates with GT resets
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_gt.c | 15 ++++++++++-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.36.1
>
>