Replace function-like macros "HB" and "LB" with static inline functions
to comply with preferred Linux coding style standards.
Signed-off-by: Brent Pappas <[email protected]>
---
diff --git a/drivers/staging/most/net/net.c b/drivers/staging/most/net/net.c
index 1d1fe8bff7ee..8a8fbc274b73 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/most/net/net.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/most/net/net.c
@@ -36,8 +36,8 @@
#define PMS_TELID_MASK 0x0F
#define PMS_TELID_SHIFT 4
-#define HB(value) ((u8)((u16)(value) >> 8))
-#define LB(value) ((u8)(value))
+static inline u8 HB(unsigned int value) { return ((u8)((u16)(value) >> 8)); }
+static inline u8 LB(unsigned int value) { return ((u8)(value)); }
#define EXTRACT_BIT_SET(bitset_name, value) \
(((value) >> bitset_name##_SHIFT) & bitset_name##_MASK)
On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 04:10:44PM +0000, Brent Pappas wrote:
> Replace function-like macros "HB" and "LB" with static inline functions
> to comply with preferred Linux coding style standards.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brent Pappas <[email protected]>
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/most/net/net.c b/drivers/staging/most/net/net.c
> index 1d1fe8bff7ee..8a8fbc274b73 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/most/net/net.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/most/net/net.c
> @@ -36,8 +36,8 @@
> #define PMS_TELID_MASK 0x0F
> #define PMS_TELID_SHIFT 4
>
> -#define HB(value) ((u8)((u16)(value) >> 8))
> -#define LB(value) ((u8)(value))
> +static inline u8 HB(unsigned int value) { return ((u8)((u16)(value) >> 8)); }
> +static inline u8 LB(unsigned int value) { return ((u8)(value)); }
>
> #define EXTRACT_BIT_SET(bitset_name, value) \
> (((value) >> bitset_name##_SHIFT) & bitset_name##_MASK)
I cannot apply your patch. I think your email client modified some
whitespace characters.
Check this for more information:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.10/process/email-clients.html
Best regards,
Nam
On 10/05/2022 19:57, Nam Cao wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 04:10:44PM +0000, Brent Pappas wrote:
> > Replace function-like macros "HB" and "LB" with static inline functions
> > to comply with preferred Linux coding style standards.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Brent Pappas <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/most/net/net.c b/drivers/staging/most/net/net.c
> > index 1d1fe8bff7ee..8a8fbc274b73 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/most/net/net.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/most/net/net.c
> > @@ -36,8 +36,8 @@
> > #define PMS_TELID_MASK 0x0F
> > #define PMS_TELID_SHIFT 4
> >
> > -#define HB(value) ((u8)((u16)(value) >> 8))
> > -#define LB(value) ((u8)(value))
> > +static inline u8 HB(unsigned int value) { return ((u8)((u16)(value) >> 8)); }
> > +static inline u8 LB(unsigned int value) { return ((u8)(value)); }
> >
> > #define EXTRACT_BIT_SET(bitset_name, value) \
> > (((value) >> bitset_name##_SHIFT) & bitset_name##_MASK)
>
> I cannot apply your patch. I think your email client modified some
> whitespace characters.
>
> Check this for more information:
> https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.kernel.org%2Fdoc%2Fhtml%2Fv4.10%2Fprocess%2Femail-clients.html&data=05%7C01%7Cpappasbrent%40knights.ucf.edu%7C3748a695ff1e438ecd0b08daa72d66bf%7C5b16e18278b3412c919668342689eeb7%7C0%7C0%7C638006110693613730%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=rq2pgVr1dqT2k9hC21LXueqMeIcVyk2Qjvjl1KtkhsU%3D&reserved=0
>
> Best regards,
> Nam
You are correct.
The tabs were converted to spaces.
I will read the link you have provided and fix the problem.
Thank you,
Brent
--
On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 09:21:24AM -0400, Brent Pappas wrote:
> The 10/05/2022 19:57, Nam Cao wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 04:10:44PM +0000, Brent Pappas wrote:
> > > Replace function-like macros "HB" and "LB" with static inline functions
> > > to comply with preferred Linux coding style standards.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Brent Pappas <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > > diff --git a/drivers/staging/most/net/net.c b/drivers/staging/most/net/net.c
> > > index 1d1fe8bff7ee..8a8fbc274b73 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/staging/most/net/net.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/staging/most/net/net.c
> > > @@ -36,8 +36,8 @@
> > > #define PMS_TELID_MASK 0x0F
> > > #define PMS_TELID_SHIFT 4
> > >
> > > -#define HB(value) ((u8)((u16)(value) >> 8))
> > > -#define LB(value) ((u8)(value))
> > > +static inline u8 HB(unsigned int value) { return ((u8)((u16)(value) >> 8)); }
> > > +static inline u8 LB(unsigned int value) { return ((u8)(value)); }
> > >
> > > #define EXTRACT_BIT_SET(bitset_name, value) \
> > > (((value) >> bitset_name##_SHIFT) & bitset_name##_MASK)
> >
> > I cannot apply your patch. I think your email client modified some
> > whitespace characters.
> >
> > Check this for more information:
> > https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.kernel.org%2Fdoc%2Fhtml%2Fv4.10%2Fprocess%2Femail-clients.html&data=05%7C01%7Cpappasbrent%40knights.ucf.edu%7C3748a695ff1e438ecd0b08daa72d66bf%7C5b16e18278b3412c919668342689eeb7%7C0%7C0%7C638006110693613730%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=rq2pgVr1dqT2k9hC21LXueqMeIcVyk2Qjvjl1KtkhsU%3D&reserved=0
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Nam
>
> I have followed your advice Nam and am now using an email cient that
> leaves whitespace intact.
>
> Should I reply to this post with the corrected diff, or would it
> be better to submit a new patch with it?
It's up to you. Replying sometimes make the conversation messy, but for
this case I think it's fine. Don't forget to add "PATCH v2" prefix and a
change log.
Best regards,
Nam
The 10/05/2022 19:57, Nam Cao wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 05, 2022 at 04:10:44PM +0000, Brent Pappas wrote:
> > Replace function-like macros "HB" and "LB" with static inline functions
> > to comply with preferred Linux coding style standards.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Brent Pappas <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/most/net/net.c b/drivers/staging/most/net/net.c
> > index 1d1fe8bff7ee..8a8fbc274b73 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/most/net/net.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/most/net/net.c
> > @@ -36,8 +36,8 @@
> > #define PMS_TELID_MASK 0x0F
> > #define PMS_TELID_SHIFT 4
> >
> > -#define HB(value) ((u8)((u16)(value) >> 8))
> > -#define LB(value) ((u8)(value))
> > +static inline u8 HB(unsigned int value) { return ((u8)((u16)(value) >> 8)); }
> > +static inline u8 LB(unsigned int value) { return ((u8)(value)); }
> >
> > #define EXTRACT_BIT_SET(bitset_name, value) \
> > (((value) >> bitset_name##_SHIFT) & bitset_name##_MASK)
>
> I cannot apply your patch. I think your email client modified some
> whitespace characters.
>
> Check this for more information:
> https://nam02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.kernel.org%2Fdoc%2Fhtml%2Fv4.10%2Fprocess%2Femail-clients.html&data=05%7C01%7Cpappasbrent%40knights.ucf.edu%7C3748a695ff1e438ecd0b08daa72d66bf%7C5b16e18278b3412c919668342689eeb7%7C0%7C0%7C638006110693613730%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=rq2pgVr1dqT2k9hC21LXueqMeIcVyk2Qjvjl1KtkhsU%3D&reserved=0
>
> Best regards,
> Nam
I have followed your advice Nam and am now using an email cient that
leaves whitespace intact.
Should I reply to this post with the corrected diff, or would it
be better to submit a new patch with it?
Thank you again for taking the time to review.
Brent
Replace function-like macros "HB" and "LB" with static inline functions
to comply with preferred Linux coding style standards.
Signed-off-by: Brent Pappas <[email protected]>
---
Changelog:
V1 -> V2: Resent diff from a mail client that would not replace tabs
with spaces so that patch can be successfully applied.
diff --git a/drivers/staging/most/net/net.c b/drivers/staging/most/net/net.c
index 1d1fe8bff7ee..8a8fbc274b73 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/most/net/net.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/most/net/net.c
@@ -36,8 +36,8 @@
#define PMS_TELID_MASK 0x0F
#define PMS_TELID_SHIFT 4
-#define HB(value) ((u8)((u16)(value) >> 8))
-#define LB(value) ((u8)(value))
+static inline u8 HB(unsigned int value) { return ((u8)((u16)(value) >> 8)); }
+static inline u8 LB(unsigned int value) { return ((u8)(value)); }
#define EXTRACT_BIT_SET(bitset_name, value) \
(((value) >> bitset_name##_SHIFT) & bitset_name##_MASK)
On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 01:02:34PM -0400, Brent Pappas wrote:
> Replace function-like macros "HB" and "LB" with static inline functions
> to comply with preferred Linux coding style standards.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brent Pappas <[email protected]>
> ---
> Changelog:
> V1 -> V2: Resent diff from a mail client that would not replace tabs
> with spaces so that patch can be successfully applied.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/most/net/net.c b/drivers/staging/most/net/net.c
> index 1d1fe8bff7ee..8a8fbc274b73 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/most/net/net.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/most/net/net.c
> @@ -36,8 +36,8 @@
> #define PMS_TELID_MASK 0x0F
> #define PMS_TELID_SHIFT 4
>
> -#define HB(value) ((u8)((u16)(value) >> 8))
> -#define LB(value) ((u8)(value))
> +static inline u8 HB(unsigned int value) { return ((u8)((u16)(value) >> 8)); }
> +static inline u8 LB(unsigned int value) { return ((u8)(value)); }
>
> #define EXTRACT_BIT_SET(bitset_name, value) \
> (((value) >> bitset_name##_SHIFT) & bitset_name##_MASK)
Sorry but I still can't apply your patch :(. I think you accidentally
added a trailing space character (at the last line).
Perhaps it's a good idea to send the patch to yourself, download the
email and try applying if it works, before sending it out.
Best regards,
Nam
Replace function-like macros "HB" and "LB" with static inline functions
to comply with preferred Linux coding style standards.
Signed-off-by: Brent Pappas <[email protected]>
---
Changelog:
V1 -> V2: Resent diff from a mail client that would not replace tabs
with spaces so that patch can be successfully applied.
V2 -> V3: Created patch using git format-patch.
Tested downloading and applying patch.
Sent patch using git send-email.
drivers/staging/most/net/net.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/most/net/net.c b/drivers/staging/most/net/net.c
index 1d1fe8bff7ee..8a8fbc274b73 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/most/net/net.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/most/net/net.c
@@ -36,8 +36,8 @@
#define PMS_TELID_MASK 0x0F
#define PMS_TELID_SHIFT 4
-#define HB(value) ((u8)((u16)(value) >> 8))
-#define LB(value) ((u8)(value))
+static inline u8 HB(unsigned int value) { return ((u8)((u16)(value) >> 8)); }
+static inline u8 LB(unsigned int value) { return ((u8)(value)); }
#define EXTRACT_BIT_SET(bitset_name, value) \
(((value) >> bitset_name##_SHIFT) & bitset_name##_MASK)
--
2.34.1
On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 07:07:57PM -0400, Brent Pappas wrote:
> Replace function-like macros "HB" and "LB" with static inline functions
> to comply with preferred Linux coding style standards.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brent Pappas <[email protected]>
> ---
> Changelog:
> V1 -> V2: Resent diff from a mail client that would not replace tabs
> with spaces so that patch can be successfully applied.
> V2 -> V3: Created patch using git format-patch.
> Tested downloading and applying patch.
> Sent patch using git send-email.
>
> drivers/staging/most/net/net.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/most/net/net.c b/drivers/staging/most/net/net.c
> index 1d1fe8bff7ee..8a8fbc274b73 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/most/net/net.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/most/net/net.c
> @@ -36,8 +36,8 @@
> #define PMS_TELID_MASK 0x0F
> #define PMS_TELID_SHIFT 4
>
> -#define HB(value) ((u8)((u16)(value) >> 8))
> -#define LB(value) ((u8)(value))
> +static inline u8 HB(unsigned int value) { return ((u8)((u16)(value) >> 8)); }
> +static inline u8 LB(unsigned int value) { return ((u8)(value)); }
If you use one less tab, you will not go over the 90 column limit,
right?
Only 1 tab is needed.
thanks,
greg k-h