From: Xu Panda <[email protected]>
The implementation of strscpy() is more robust and safer.
Signed-off-by: Xu Panda <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Yang Yang <[email protected]>
---
arch/m68k/kernel/setup_no.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/m68k/kernel/setup_no.c b/arch/m68k/kernel/setup_no.c
index cb6def585851..37fb663559b4 100644
--- a/arch/m68k/kernel/setup_no.c
+++ b/arch/m68k/kernel/setup_no.c
@@ -90,8 +90,7 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
config_BSP(&command_line[0], sizeof(command_line));
#if defined(CONFIG_BOOTPARAM)
- strncpy(&command_line[0], CONFIG_BOOTPARAM_STRING, sizeof(command_line));
- command_line[sizeof(command_line) - 1] = 0;
+ strscpy(&command_line[0], CONFIG_BOOTPARAM_STRING, sizeof(command_line));
#endif /* CONFIG_BOOTPARAM */
process_uboot_commandline(&command_line[0], sizeof(command_line));
--
2.15.2
Hi Xu,
On 3/12/22 16:10, [email protected] wrote:
> From: Xu Panda <[email protected]>
>
> The implementation of strscpy() is more robust and safer.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xu Panda <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Yang <[email protected]>
Thanks. Seeing as this is non-MMU related I'll take this through
the m68knommu git tree. Applied to the for-next branch.
Regards
Greg
> ---
> arch/m68k/kernel/setup_no.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/m68k/kernel/setup_no.c b/arch/m68k/kernel/setup_no.c
> index cb6def585851..37fb663559b4 100644
> --- a/arch/m68k/kernel/setup_no.c
> +++ b/arch/m68k/kernel/setup_no.c
> @@ -90,8 +90,7 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
> config_BSP(&command_line[0], sizeof(command_line));
>
> #if defined(CONFIG_BOOTPARAM)
> - strncpy(&command_line[0], CONFIG_BOOTPARAM_STRING, sizeof(command_line));
> - command_line[sizeof(command_line) - 1] = 0;
> + strscpy(&command_line[0], CONFIG_BOOTPARAM_STRING, sizeof(command_line));
> #endif /* CONFIG_BOOTPARAM */
>
> process_uboot_commandline(&command_line[0], sizeof(command_line));