2022-12-15 11:11:25

by Wenchao Hao

Subject: [PATCH] ata:libata-eh:Cleanup ata_scsi_cmd_error_handler

If ap->ops->error_handler is NULL, just go out and release the
spinlock. This patch is just a cleanup, which would not change
the origin error handle logic.

Signed-off-by: Wenchao Hao <[email protected]>
---
drivers/ata/libata-eh.c | 96 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
index 34303ce67c14..66ca3ac7cd58 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/libata-eh.c
@@ -565,6 +565,8 @@ void ata_scsi_cmd_error_handler(struct Scsi_Host *host, struct ata_port *ap,
{
int i;
unsigned long flags;
+ struct scsi_cmnd *scmd, *tmp;
+ int nr_timedout = 0;

/* make sure sff pio task is not running */
ata_sff_flush_pio_task(ap);
@@ -584,62 +586,60 @@ void ata_scsi_cmd_error_handler(struct Scsi_Host *host, struct ata_port *ap,
* timed out iff its associated qc is active and not failed.
*/
spin_lock_irqsave(ap->lock, flags);
- if (ap->ops->error_handler) {
- struct scsi_cmnd *scmd, *tmp;
- int nr_timedout = 0;
-
- /* This must occur under the ap->lock as we don't want
- a polled recovery to race the real interrupt handler
-
- The lost_interrupt handler checks for any completed but
- non-notified command and completes much like an IRQ handler.
-
- We then fall into the error recovery code which will treat
- this as if normal completion won the race */
+ if (!ap->ops->error_handler)
+ goto out;

- if (ap->ops->lost_interrupt)
- ap->ops->lost_interrupt(ap);
+ /* This must occur under the ap->lock as we don't want
+ * a polled recovery to race the real interrupt handler
+ *
+ * The lost_interrupt handler checks for any completed but
+ * non-notified command and completes much like an IRQ handler.
+ *
+ * We then fall into the error recovery code which will treat
+ * this as if normal completion won the race
+ */
+ if (ap->ops->lost_interrupt)
+ ap->ops->lost_interrupt(ap);

- list_for_each_entry_safe(scmd, tmp, eh_work_q, eh_entry) {
- struct ata_queued_cmd *qc;
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(scmd, tmp, eh_work_q, eh_entry) {
+ struct ata_queued_cmd *qc;

- ata_qc_for_each_raw(ap, qc, i) {
- if (qc->flags & ATA_QCFLAG_ACTIVE &&
- qc->scsicmd == scmd)
- break;
- }
+ ata_qc_for_each_raw(ap, qc, i) {
+ if (qc->flags & ATA_QCFLAG_ACTIVE &&
+ qc->scsicmd == scmd)
+ break;
+ }

- if (i < ATA_MAX_QUEUE) {
- /* the scmd has an associated qc */
- if (!(qc->flags & ATA_QCFLAG_FAILED)) {
- /* which hasn't failed yet, timeout */
- qc->err_mask |= AC_ERR_TIMEOUT;
- qc->flags |= ATA_QCFLAG_FAILED;
- nr_timedout++;
- }
- } else {
- /* Normal completion occurred after
- * SCSI timeout but before this point.
- * Successfully complete it.
- */
- scmd->retries = scmd->allowed;
- scsi_eh_finish_cmd(scmd, &ap->eh_done_q);
+ if (i < ATA_MAX_QUEUE) {
+ /* the scmd has an associated qc */
+ if (!(qc->flags & ATA_QCFLAG_FAILED)) {
+ /* which hasn't failed yet, timeout */
+ qc->err_mask |= AC_ERR_TIMEOUT;
+ qc->flags |= ATA_QCFLAG_FAILED;
+ nr_timedout++;
}
+ } else {
+ /* Normal completion occurred after
+ * SCSI timeout but before this point.
+ * Successfully complete it.
+ */
+ scmd->retries = scmd->allowed;
+ scsi_eh_finish_cmd(scmd, &ap->eh_done_q);
}
+ }

- /* If we have timed out qcs. They belong to EH from
- * this point but the state of the controller is
- * unknown. Freeze the port to make sure the IRQ
- * handler doesn't diddle with those qcs. This must
- * be done atomically w.r.t. setting QCFLAG_FAILED.
- */
- if (nr_timedout)
- __ata_port_freeze(ap);
-
+ /* If we have timed out qcs. They belong to EH from
+ * this point but the state of the controller is
+ * unknown. Freeze the port to make sure the IRQ
+ * handler doesn't diddle with those qcs. This must
+ * be done atomically w.r.t. setting QCFLAG_FAILED.
+ */
+ if (nr_timedout)
+ __ata_port_freeze(ap);

- /* initialize eh_tries */
- ap->eh_tries = ATA_EH_MAX_TRIES;
- }
+ /* initialize eh_tries */
+ ap->eh_tries = ATA_EH_MAX_TRIES;
+out:
spin_unlock_irqrestore(ap->lock, flags);

}
--
2.32.0

2022-12-15 11:58:00

by Wenchao Hao

Subject: Re: [PATCH] ata:libata-eh:Cleanup ata_scsi_cmd_error_handler

On 2022/12/15 18:09, Wenchao Hao wrote:
> If ap->ops->error_handler is NULL, just go out and release the
> spinlock. This patch is just a cleanup, which would not change
> the origin error handle logic.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wenchao Hao <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/ata/libata-eh.c | 96 ++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
> 1 file changed, 48 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
>
Sorry, I send the wrong patch file, please ignore it