2023-02-10 17:55:50

by Alok Tiwari

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] scsi: target: core: Added a blank line after target_remove_from_tmr_list()

There is no separate blank line between target_remove_from_tmr_list() and
transport_cmd_check_stop_to_fabric
As per coding-style, it is require to separate functions with one blank line.

Fixes: 12b6fcd0ea7f ("scsi: target: core: Remove from tmr_list during LUN unlink")
Signed-off-by: Alok Tiwari <[email protected]>
---
drivers/target/target_core_transport.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c b/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c
index 5926316252eb..f1cdf78fc5ef 100644
--- a/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c
@@ -691,6 +691,7 @@ static void target_remove_from_tmr_list(struct se_cmd *cmd)
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->se_tmr_lock, flags);
}
}
+
/*
* This function is called by the target core after the target core has
* finished processing a SCSI command or SCSI TMF. Both the regular command
--
2.39.1



2023-02-11 07:48:21

by Greg Kroah-Hartman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: target: core: Added a blank line after target_remove_from_tmr_list()

On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 09:55:22AM -0800, Alok Tiwari wrote:
> There is no separate blank line between target_remove_from_tmr_list() and
> transport_cmd_check_stop_to_fabric
> As per coding-style, it is require to separate functions with one blank line.
>
> Fixes: 12b6fcd0ea7f ("scsi: target: core: Remove from tmr_list during LUN unlink")
> Signed-off-by: Alok Tiwari <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/target/target_core_transport.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c b/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c
> index 5926316252eb..f1cdf78fc5ef 100644
> --- a/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c
> +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c
> @@ -691,6 +691,7 @@ static void target_remove_from_tmr_list(struct se_cmd *cmd)
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->se_tmr_lock, flags);
> }
> }
> +
> /*
> * This function is called by the target core after the target core has
> * finished processing a SCSI command or SCSI TMF. Both the regular command
> --
> 2.39.1
>

Why is a coding style change tagged with a "fixes:" line and cc: stable?

thanks,

greg k-h

2023-02-11 08:21:13

by Alok Tiwari

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: target: core: Added a blank line after target_remove_from_tmr_list()

commit "Fixes: 12b6fcd0ea7f" introduce that change in source code.
that's reason we are using "fixes:". back-porting that change is creating awkward manual conflict resolution.

Thanks,
Alok

On 2/11/2023 1:18 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 09:55:22AM -0800, Alok Tiwari wrote:
>> There is no separate blank line between target_remove_from_tmr_list() and
>> transport_cmd_check_stop_to_fabric
>> As per coding-style, it is require to separate functions with one blank line.
>>
>> Fixes: 12b6fcd0ea7f ("scsi: target: core: Remove from tmr_list during LUN unlink")
>> Signed-off-by: Alok Tiwari <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> drivers/target/target_core_transport.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c b/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c
>> index 5926316252eb..f1cdf78fc5ef 100644
>> --- a/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c
>> +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c
>> @@ -691,6 +691,7 @@ static void target_remove_from_tmr_list(struct se_cmd *cmd)
>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->se_tmr_lock, flags);
>> }
>> }
>> +
>> /*
>> * This function is called by the target core after the target core has
>> * finished processing a SCSI command or SCSI TMF. Both the regular command
>> --
>> 2.39.1
>>
> Why is a coding style change tagged with a "fixes:" line and cc: stable?
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h

2023-02-11 10:04:53

by Alok Tiwari

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: target: core: Added a blank line after target_remove_from_tmr_list()


On 2/11/2023 1:50 PM, ALOK TIWARI wrote:
> commit "Fixes: 12b6fcd0ea7f" introduce that change in source code.
> that's reason we are using "fixes:". back-porting that change is
> creating awkward manual conflict resolution.
>
> Thanks,
> Alok
>
> On 2/11/2023 1:18 PM, Greg KH wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 10, 2023 at 09:55:22AM -0800, Alok Tiwari wrote:
>>> There is no separate blank line between
>>> target_remove_from_tmr_list() and
>>> transport_cmd_check_stop_to_fabric
>>> As per coding-style, it is require to separate functions with one
>>> blank line.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 12b6fcd0ea7f ("scsi: target: core: Remove from tmr_list
>>> during LUN unlink")
>>> Signed-off-by: Alok Tiwari <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/target/target_core_transport.c | 1 +
>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c
>>> b/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c
>>> index 5926316252eb..f1cdf78fc5ef 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_transport.c
>>> @@ -691,6 +691,7 @@ static void target_remove_from_tmr_list(struct
>>> se_cmd *cmd)
>>>           spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->se_tmr_lock, flags);
>>>       }
>>>   }
>>> +
>>>   /*
>>>    * This function is called by the target core after the target
>>> core has
>>>    * finished processing a SCSI command or SCSI TMF. Both the
>>> regular command
>>> --
>>> 2.39.1
>>>
>> Why is a coding style change tagged with a "fixes:" line and cc: stable?
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> greg k-h

I will send new version to remove  -> "fixes:" line and cc: stable

Thanks,

Alok