2023-03-23 17:17:47

by Harshit Mogalapalli

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH next] ASoC: cs35l56: Fix unsigned 'rv' comparison with zero in cs35l56_irq()

'rv' is of type unsigned int, which can never be less than zero.

rv = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(cs35l56->dev);
if (rv < 0) { // can never be true.
...
}

As pm_runtime_resume_and_get returns integers, change the type of 'rv'
to int to fix this.

This is found by static analysis with smatch.

Fixes: e49611252900 ("ASoC: cs35l56: Add driver for Cirrus Logic CS35L56")
Signed-off-by: Harshit Mogalapalli <[email protected]>
---
Only compile tested.
---
sound/soc/codecs/cs35l56.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/cs35l56.c b/sound/soc/codecs/cs35l56.c
index 90fc79b5666d..b3772005668a 100644
--- a/sound/soc/codecs/cs35l56.c
+++ b/sound/soc/codecs/cs35l56.c
@@ -321,7 +321,8 @@ irqreturn_t cs35l56_irq(int irq, void *data)
struct cs35l56_private *cs35l56 = data;
unsigned int status1 = 0, status8 = 0, status20 = 0;
unsigned int mask1, mask8, mask20;
- unsigned int rv, val;
+ unsigned int val;
+ int rv;
irqreturn_t ret = IRQ_NONE;

if (!cs35l56->init_done)
--
2.38.1


2023-04-04 11:46:56

by Mark Brown

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH next] ASoC: cs35l56: Fix unsigned 'rv' comparison with zero in cs35l56_irq()

On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 09:58:25AM -0700, Harshit Mogalapalli wrote:
> 'rv' is of type unsigned int, which can never be less than zero.

This doesn't apply against current code, please check and resend.


Attachments:
(No filename) (207.00 B)
signature.asc (499.00 B)
Download all attachments

2023-04-04 18:43:01

by Harshit Mogalapalli

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH next] ASoC: cs35l56: Fix unsigned 'rv' comparison with zero in cs35l56_irq()

Hi Mark,

On 04/04/23 5:15 pm, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 09:58:25AM -0700, Harshit Mogalapalli wrote:
>> 'rv' is of type unsigned int, which can never be less than zero.
>
> This doesn't apply against current code, please check and resend.

The reason for the above is that someone else sent a patch next day
fixing the same bug which got merged in linux-next.

Ref:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/

So my patch will not apply and is not needed anymore.

Thanks,
Harshit