As suggested by Willy it is possible to detect the availability of
stackprotector via preprocessor defines.
Make use of that to simplify the code and interface of nolibc.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <[email protected]>
---
Thomas Weißschuh (7):
tools/nolibc: fix typo pint -> point
tools/nolibc: x86_64: disable stack protector for _start
tools/nolibc: ensure stack protector guard is never zero
tools/nolibc: add test for __stack_chk_guard initialization
tools/nolibc: reformat list of headers to be installed
tools/nolibc: add autodetection for stackprotector support
tools/nolibc: simplify stackprotector compiler flags
tools/include/nolibc/Makefile | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
tools/include/nolibc/arch-aarch64.h | 6 +++---
tools/include/nolibc/arch-arm.h | 6 +++---
tools/include/nolibc/arch-i386.h | 6 +++---
tools/include/nolibc/arch-loongarch.h | 6 +++---
tools/include/nolibc/arch-mips.h | 6 +++---
tools/include/nolibc/arch-riscv.h | 6 +++---
tools/include/nolibc/arch-x86_64.h | 8 ++++----
tools/include/nolibc/arch.h | 2 +-
tools/include/nolibc/compiler.h | 15 +++++++++++++++
tools/include/nolibc/stackprotector.h | 15 ++++++---------
tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile | 13 ++-----------
tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c | 10 +++++++++-
13 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
---
base-commit: 606343b7478c319cb30291a39ecbceddb42229d6
change-id: 20230521-nolibc-automatic-stack-protector-b4f7fab9e625
Best regards,
--
Thomas Weißschuh <[email protected]>
Hi Thomas,
On Sun, May 21, 2023 at 11:36:28AM +0200, Thomas Wei?schuh wrote:
> As suggested by Willy it is possible to detect the availability of
> stackprotector via preprocessor defines.
> Make use of that to simplify the code and interface of nolibc.
I have just had a quick glance over it and not tested it yet, but
overall I really like it, thank you! I'll try to give you some
feedback today (or simply merge it).
Willy