2023-06-09 19:56:54

by Sidhartha Kumar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm/hugetlb: add wrapper functions for interactions with page cache

On 6/9/23 12:49 PM, Sidhartha Kumar wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Sidhartha Kumar <[email protected]>

Sorry, I missed adding the commit message to this. It should be:

Add filemap_lock_hugetlb_folio() which is wraps __filemap_get_folio()
and passes in a linear page index. hugetlb_add_to_page_cache() is modified
to also compute a linear page index before calling into page cache code.

linear_page_index() is modified to perform the computation on hugetlb
so we can use it in the page cache wrappers.

> ---
> fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c | 14 +++++++-------
> include/linux/hugetlb.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++--
> include/linux/pagemap.h | 2 --
> mm/hugetlb.c | 22 +++++++++++++---------
> 4 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
> index 90361a922cec7..90d27a8af4b6a 100644
> --- a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
> @@ -617,20 +617,19 @@ static void remove_inode_hugepages(struct inode *inode, loff_t lstart,
> struct hstate *h = hstate_inode(inode);
> struct address_space *mapping = &inode->i_data;
> const pgoff_t start = lstart >> huge_page_shift(h);
> - const pgoff_t end = lend >> huge_page_shift(h);
> struct folio_batch fbatch;
> pgoff_t next, index;
> int i, freed = 0;
> bool truncate_op = (lend == LLONG_MAX);
>
> folio_batch_init(&fbatch);
> - next = start;
> - while (filemap_get_folios(mapping, &next, end - 1, &fbatch)) {
> + next = lstart;
> + while (filemap_get_folios(mapping, &next, lend - 1, &fbatch)) {
> for (i = 0; i < folio_batch_count(&fbatch); ++i) {
> struct folio *folio = fbatch.folios[i];
> u32 hash = 0;
>
> - index = folio->index;
> + index = (folio->index) >> huge_page_shift(h);
> hash = hugetlb_fault_mutex_hash(mapping, index);
> mutex_lock(&hugetlb_fault_mutex_table[hash]);
>
> @@ -693,10 +692,11 @@ static void hugetlbfs_zero_partial_page(struct hstate *h,
> loff_t start,
> loff_t end)
> {
> - pgoff_t idx = start >> huge_page_shift(h);
> + struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
> + struct vm_area_struct *vma = find_vma(mm, start);
> struct folio *folio;
>
> - folio = filemap_lock_folio(mapping, idx);
> + folio = filemap_lock_hugetlb_folio(vma, start);
> if (IS_ERR(folio))
> return;
>
> @@ -868,7 +868,7 @@ static long hugetlbfs_fallocate(struct file *file, int mode, loff_t offset,
> }
> clear_huge_page(&folio->page, addr, pages_per_huge_page(h));
> __folio_mark_uptodate(folio);
> - error = hugetlb_add_to_page_cache(folio, mapping, index);
> + error = hugetlb_add_to_page_cache(folio, &pseudo_vma, mapping, addr);
> if (unlikely(error)) {
> restore_reserve_on_error(h, &pseudo_vma, addr, folio);
> folio_put(folio);
> diff --git a/include/linux/hugetlb.h b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> index 21f942025fecd..55f90e051b7a2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> +++ b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> @@ -727,8 +727,8 @@ struct folio *alloc_hugetlb_folio_nodemask(struct hstate *h, int preferred_nid,
> nodemask_t *nmask, gfp_t gfp_mask);
> struct folio *alloc_hugetlb_folio_vma(struct hstate *h, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> unsigned long address);
> -int hugetlb_add_to_page_cache(struct folio *folio, struct address_space *mapping,
> - pgoff_t idx);
> +int hugetlb_add_to_page_cache(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> + struct address_space *mapping, unsigned long address);
> void restore_reserve_on_error(struct hstate *h, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> unsigned long address, struct folio *folio);
>
> @@ -755,6 +755,16 @@ static inline struct hugepage_subpool *hugetlb_folio_subpool(struct folio *folio
> return folio->_hugetlb_subpool;
> }
>
> +/* Wrapper function for __filemap_get_folio*/
> +static inline struct folio *filemap_lock_hugetlb_folio(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> + unsigned long address)
> +{
> + struct address_space *mapping = vma->vm_file->f_mapping;
> +
> + pgoff_t idx = linear_page_index(vma, address);
> + return __filemap_get_folio(mapping, idx, FGP_LOCK, 0);
> +}
> +
> static inline void hugetlb_set_folio_subpool(struct folio *folio,
> struct hugepage_subpool *subpool)
> {
> @@ -1021,6 +1031,13 @@ static inline struct hugepage_subpool *hugetlb_folio_subpool(struct folio *folio
> return NULL;
> }
>
> +/* Wrapper function for __filemap_get_folio*/
> +static inline struct folio *filemap_lock_hugetlb_folio(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> + unsigned long address)
> +{
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
> static inline int isolate_or_dissolve_huge_page(struct page *page,
> struct list_head *list)
> {
> diff --git a/include/linux/pagemap.h b/include/linux/pagemap.h
> index 17c414fc2136e..ae8f36966d7b3 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pagemap.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pagemap.h
> @@ -860,8 +860,6 @@ static inline pgoff_t linear_page_index(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> unsigned long address)
> {
> pgoff_t pgoff;
> - if (unlikely(is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma)))
> - return linear_hugepage_index(vma, address);
> pgoff = (address - vma->vm_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> pgoff += vma->vm_pgoff;
> return pgoff;
> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> index dfa412d8cb300..824d6d215a161 100644
> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> @@ -951,7 +951,7 @@ static long region_count(struct resv_map *resv, long f, long t)
>
> /*
> * Convert the address within this vma to the page offset within
> - * the mapping, in pagecache page units; huge pages here.
> + * the mapping, in huge page units here.
> */
> static pgoff_t vma_hugecache_offset(struct hstate *h,
> struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address)
> @@ -5730,7 +5730,7 @@ static bool hugetlbfs_pagecache_present(struct hstate *h,
> struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address)
> {
> struct address_space *mapping = vma->vm_file->f_mapping;
> - pgoff_t idx = vma_hugecache_offset(h, vma, address);
> + pgoff_t idx = linear_page_index(vma, address);
> bool present;
>
> rcu_read_lock();
> @@ -5740,13 +5740,16 @@ static bool hugetlbfs_pagecache_present(struct hstate *h,
> return present;
> }
>
> -int hugetlb_add_to_page_cache(struct folio *folio, struct address_space *mapping,
> - pgoff_t idx)
> +int hugetlb_add_to_page_cache(struct folio *folio,
> + struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> + struct address_space *mapping,
> + unsigned long address)
> {
> struct inode *inode = mapping->host;
> struct hstate *h = hstate_inode(inode);
> int err;
>
> + pgoff_t idx = linear_page_index(vma, address);
> __folio_set_locked(folio);
> err = __filemap_add_folio(mapping, folio, idx, GFP_KERNEL, NULL);
>
> @@ -5854,7 +5857,8 @@ static vm_fault_t hugetlb_no_page(struct mm_struct *mm,
> * before we get page_table_lock.
> */
> new_folio = false;
> - folio = filemap_lock_folio(mapping, idx);
> +
> + folio = filemap_lock_hugetlb_folio(vma, address);
> if (IS_ERR(folio)) {
> size = i_size_read(mapping->host) >> huge_page_shift(h);
> if (idx >= size)
> @@ -5913,7 +5917,7 @@ static vm_fault_t hugetlb_no_page(struct mm_struct *mm,
> new_folio = true;
>
> if (vma->vm_flags & VM_MAYSHARE) {
> - int err = hugetlb_add_to_page_cache(folio, mapping, idx);
> + int err = hugetlb_add_to_page_cache(folio, vma, mapping, address);
> if (err) {
> /*
> * err can't be -EEXIST which implies someone
> @@ -6145,7 +6149,7 @@ vm_fault_t hugetlb_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> /* Just decrements count, does not deallocate */
> vma_end_reservation(h, vma, haddr);
>
> - pagecache_folio = filemap_lock_folio(mapping, idx);
> + pagecache_folio = filemap_lock_hugetlb_folio(vma, address);
> if (IS_ERR(pagecache_folio))
> pagecache_folio = NULL;
> }
> @@ -6258,7 +6262,7 @@ int hugetlb_mfill_atomic_pte(pte_t *dst_pte,
>
> if (is_continue) {
> ret = -EFAULT;
> - folio = filemap_lock_folio(mapping, idx);
> + folio = filemap_lock_hugetlb_folio(dst_vma, dst_addr);
> if (IS_ERR(folio))
> goto out;
> folio_in_pagecache = true;
> @@ -6350,7 +6354,7 @@ int hugetlb_mfill_atomic_pte(pte_t *dst_pte,
> * hugetlb_fault_mutex_table that here must be hold by
> * the caller.
> */
> - ret = hugetlb_add_to_page_cache(folio, mapping, idx);
> + ret = hugetlb_add_to_page_cache(folio, dst_vma, mapping, dst_addr);
> if (ret)
> goto out_release_nounlock;
> folio_in_pagecache = true;



2023-06-15 23:47:02

by Mike Kravetz

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm/hugetlb: add wrapper functions for interactions with page cache

On 06/09/23 12:52, Sidhartha Kumar wrote:
> On 6/9/23 12:49 PM, Sidhartha Kumar wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Sidhartha Kumar <[email protected]>
>
> Sorry, I missed adding the commit message to this. It should be:
>
> Add filemap_lock_hugetlb_folio() which is wraps __filemap_get_folio()
> and passes in a linear page index. hugetlb_add_to_page_cache() is modified
> to also compute a linear page index before calling into page cache code.
>
> linear_page_index() is modified to perform the computation on hugetlb
> so we can use it in the page cache wrappers.
>
> > ---
> > fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c | 14 +++++++-------
> > include/linux/hugetlb.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++--
> > include/linux/pagemap.h | 2 --
> > mm/hugetlb.c | 22 +++++++++++++---------
> > 4 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
> > index 90361a922cec7..90d27a8af4b6a 100644
> > --- a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
> > +++ b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
> > @@ -617,20 +617,19 @@ static void remove_inode_hugepages(struct inode *inode, loff_t lstart,
> > struct hstate *h = hstate_inode(inode);
> > struct address_space *mapping = &inode->i_data;
> > const pgoff_t start = lstart >> huge_page_shift(h);
> > - const pgoff_t end = lend >> huge_page_shift(h);
> > struct folio_batch fbatch;
> > pgoff_t next, index;
> > int i, freed = 0;
> > bool truncate_op = (lend == LLONG_MAX);
> > folio_batch_init(&fbatch);
> > - next = start;
> > - while (filemap_get_folios(mapping, &next, end - 1, &fbatch)) {
> > + next = lstart;
> > + while (filemap_get_folios(mapping, &next, lend - 1, &fbatch)) {

This does not seem correct. At this point next == lstart which is a file
offset passed to the routine as opposed to an index.

I would think next needs to be set to 'lstart >> PAGE_SHIFT' here.

> > for (i = 0; i < folio_batch_count(&fbatch); ++i) {
> > struct folio *folio = fbatch.folios[i];
> > u32 hash = 0;
> > - index = folio->index;
> > + index = (folio->index) >> huge_page_shift(h);

Here you want to convert index from the PAGE_SIZE index to a hugetlb
page size index. Correct?
I am terrible at arithmetic, but huge_page_shift already includes
PAGE_SHIFT, so it seems like you want this to me.

index = (folio->index) >> huge_page_order(h);

> > hash = hugetlb_fault_mutex_hash(mapping, index);
> > mutex_lock(&hugetlb_fault_mutex_table[hash]);
> > @@ -693,10 +692,11 @@ static void hugetlbfs_zero_partial_page(struct hstate *h,
> > loff_t start,
> > loff_t end)
> > {
> > - pgoff_t idx = start >> huge_page_shift(h);
> > + struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
> > + struct vm_area_struct *vma = find_vma(mm, start);
> > struct folio *folio;
> > - folio = filemap_lock_folio(mapping, idx);
> > + folio = filemap_lock_hugetlb_folio(vma, start);

Here you are passing an address/index that may be associated with a
tail page. I assume since the hugetlb folio is multi-order, the
returned folio will be for the 'head page'. Correct?

> > if (IS_ERR(folio))
> > return;
> > @@ -868,7 +868,7 @@ static long hugetlbfs_fallocate(struct file *file, int mode, loff_t offset,
> > }
> > clear_huge_page(&folio->page, addr, pages_per_huge_page(h));
> > __folio_mark_uptodate(folio);
> > - error = hugetlb_add_to_page_cache(folio, mapping, index);
> > + error = hugetlb_add_to_page_cache(folio, &pseudo_vma, mapping, addr);
> > if (unlikely(error)) {
> > restore_reserve_on_error(h, &pseudo_vma, addr, folio);
> > folio_put(folio);
> > diff --git a/include/linux/hugetlb.h b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> > index 21f942025fecd..55f90e051b7a2 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
> > @@ -727,8 +727,8 @@ struct folio *alloc_hugetlb_folio_nodemask(struct hstate *h, int preferred_nid,
> > nodemask_t *nmask, gfp_t gfp_mask);
> > struct folio *alloc_hugetlb_folio_vma(struct hstate *h, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > unsigned long address);
> > -int hugetlb_add_to_page_cache(struct folio *folio, struct address_space *mapping,
> > - pgoff_t idx);
> > +int hugetlb_add_to_page_cache(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > + struct address_space *mapping, unsigned long address);
> > void restore_reserve_on_error(struct hstate *h, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > unsigned long address, struct folio *folio);
> > @@ -755,6 +755,16 @@ static inline struct hugepage_subpool *hugetlb_folio_subpool(struct folio *folio
> > return folio->_hugetlb_subpool;
> > }
> > +/* Wrapper function for __filemap_get_folio*/
> > +static inline struct folio *filemap_lock_hugetlb_folio(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > + unsigned long address)
> > +{
> > + struct address_space *mapping = vma->vm_file->f_mapping;
> > +
> > + pgoff_t idx = linear_page_index(vma, address);
> > + return __filemap_get_folio(mapping, idx, FGP_LOCK, 0);
> > +}

I like the wrapper idea. This is going to replace existing calls to
filemap_lock_folio. What about something like this for the routine:

static inline struct folio *filemap_lock_hugetlb_folio(struct hstate *h,
struct address_space *mapping,
pgoff_t index);
{
/* please verify my arithmetic */
return filemap_lock_folio(mapping, index << huge_page_order(h));
}

In this way, existing callers would only need to be changed to pass in
hstate. Perhaps, there was a reason for your wrapper not obvious to me?

> > +
> > static inline void hugetlb_set_folio_subpool(struct folio *folio,
> > struct hugepage_subpool *subpool)
> > {
> > @@ -1021,6 +1031,13 @@ static inline struct hugepage_subpool *hugetlb_folio_subpool(struct folio *folio
> > return NULL;
> > }
> > +/* Wrapper function for __filemap_get_folio*/
> > +static inline struct folio *filemap_lock_hugetlb_folio(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > + unsigned long address)
> > +{
> > + return NULL;
> > +}
> > +
> > static inline int isolate_or_dissolve_huge_page(struct page *page,
> > struct list_head *list)
> > {
> > diff --git a/include/linux/pagemap.h b/include/linux/pagemap.h
> > index 17c414fc2136e..ae8f36966d7b3 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/pagemap.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/pagemap.h
> > @@ -860,8 +860,6 @@ static inline pgoff_t linear_page_index(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > unsigned long address)
> > {
> > pgoff_t pgoff;
> > - if (unlikely(is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma)))
> > - return linear_hugepage_index(vma, address);
> > pgoff = (address - vma->vm_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> > pgoff += vma->vm_pgoff;
> > return pgoff;
> > diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
> > index dfa412d8cb300..824d6d215a161 100644
> > --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
> > +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
> > @@ -951,7 +951,7 @@ static long region_count(struct resv_map *resv, long f, long t)
> > /*
> > * Convert the address within this vma to the page offset within
> > - * the mapping, in pagecache page units; huge pages here.
> > + * the mapping, in huge page units here.
> > */
> > static pgoff_t vma_hugecache_offset(struct hstate *h,
> > struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address)
> > @@ -5730,7 +5730,7 @@ static bool hugetlbfs_pagecache_present(struct hstate *h,
> > struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address)
> > {
> > struct address_space *mapping = vma->vm_file->f_mapping;
> > - pgoff_t idx = vma_hugecache_offset(h, vma, address);
> > + pgoff_t idx = linear_page_index(vma, address);
> > bool present;
> > rcu_read_lock();
> > @@ -5740,13 +5740,16 @@ static bool hugetlbfs_pagecache_present(struct hstate *h,
> > return present;
> > }
> > -int hugetlb_add_to_page_cache(struct folio *folio, struct address_space *mapping,
> > - pgoff_t idx)
> > +int hugetlb_add_to_page_cache(struct folio *folio,
> > + struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > + struct address_space *mapping,
> > + unsigned long address)
> > {

Like filemap_lock_hugetlb_folio(), can you just add hstate to existing
hugetlb_add_to_page_cache() arguments and do arithmetic to convert index
to PAGE_SIZE based index?

Again, I could be missing something. But, IMO such a conversion would
minimize changes to the current code.
--
Mike Kravetz

> > struct inode *inode = mapping->host;
> > struct hstate *h = hstate_inode(inode);
> > int err;
> > + pgoff_t idx = linear_page_index(vma, address);
> > __folio_set_locked(folio);
> > err = __filemap_add_folio(mapping, folio, idx, GFP_KERNEL, NULL);
> > @@ -5854,7 +5857,8 @@ static vm_fault_t hugetlb_no_page(struct mm_struct *mm,
> > * before we get page_table_lock.
> > */
> > new_folio = false;
> > - folio = filemap_lock_folio(mapping, idx);
> > +
> > + folio = filemap_lock_hugetlb_folio(vma, address);
> > if (IS_ERR(folio)) {
> > size = i_size_read(mapping->host) >> huge_page_shift(h);
> > if (idx >= size)
> > @@ -5913,7 +5917,7 @@ static vm_fault_t hugetlb_no_page(struct mm_struct *mm,
> > new_folio = true;
> > if (vma->vm_flags & VM_MAYSHARE) {
> > - int err = hugetlb_add_to_page_cache(folio, mapping, idx);
> > + int err = hugetlb_add_to_page_cache(folio, vma, mapping, address);
> > if (err) {
> > /*
> > * err can't be -EEXIST which implies someone
> > @@ -6145,7 +6149,7 @@ vm_fault_t hugetlb_fault(struct mm_struct *mm, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > /* Just decrements count, does not deallocate */
> > vma_end_reservation(h, vma, haddr);
> > - pagecache_folio = filemap_lock_folio(mapping, idx);
> > + pagecache_folio = filemap_lock_hugetlb_folio(vma, address);
> > if (IS_ERR(pagecache_folio))
> > pagecache_folio = NULL;
> > }
> > @@ -6258,7 +6262,7 @@ int hugetlb_mfill_atomic_pte(pte_t *dst_pte,
> > if (is_continue) {
> > ret = -EFAULT;
> > - folio = filemap_lock_folio(mapping, idx);
> > + folio = filemap_lock_hugetlb_folio(dst_vma, dst_addr);
> > if (IS_ERR(folio))
> > goto out;
> > folio_in_pagecache = true;
> > @@ -6350,7 +6354,7 @@ int hugetlb_mfill_atomic_pte(pte_t *dst_pte,
> > * hugetlb_fault_mutex_table that here must be hold by
> > * the caller.
> > */
> > - ret = hugetlb_add_to_page_cache(folio, mapping, idx);
> > + ret = hugetlb_add_to_page_cache(folio, dst_vma, mapping, dst_addr);
> > if (ret)
> > goto out_release_nounlock;
> > folio_in_pagecache = true;
>

2023-06-16 19:04:44

by Sidhartha Kumar

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm/hugetlb: add wrapper functions for interactions with page cache

On 6/15/23 4:36 PM, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> On 06/09/23 12:52, Sidhartha Kumar wrote:
>> On 6/9/23 12:49 PM, Sidhartha Kumar wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Sidhartha Kumar <[email protected]>
>>
>> Sorry, I missed adding the commit message to this. It should be:
>>
>> Add filemap_lock_hugetlb_folio() which is wraps __filemap_get_folio()
>> and passes in a linear page index. hugetlb_add_to_page_cache() is modified
>> to also compute a linear page index before calling into page cache code.
>>
>> linear_page_index() is modified to perform the computation on hugetlb
>> so we can use it in the page cache wrappers.
>>
>>> ---
>>> fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c | 14 +++++++-------
>>> include/linux/hugetlb.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++--
>>> include/linux/pagemap.h | 2 --
>>> mm/hugetlb.c | 22 +++++++++++++---------
>>> 4 files changed, 39 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
>>> index 90361a922cec7..90d27a8af4b6a 100644
>>> --- a/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
>>> +++ b/fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c
>>> @@ -617,20 +617,19 @@ static void remove_inode_hugepages(struct inode *inode, loff_t lstart,
>>> struct hstate *h = hstate_inode(inode);
>>> struct address_space *mapping = &inode->i_data;
>>> const pgoff_t start = lstart >> huge_page_shift(h);
>>> - const pgoff_t end = lend >> huge_page_shift(h);
>>> struct folio_batch fbatch;
>>> pgoff_t next, index;
>>> int i, freed = 0;
>>> bool truncate_op = (lend == LLONG_MAX);
>>> folio_batch_init(&fbatch);
>>> - next = start;
>>> - while (filemap_get_folios(mapping, &next, end - 1, &fbatch)) {
>>> + next = lstart;
>>> + while (filemap_get_folios(mapping, &next, lend - 1, &fbatch)) {
>
> This does not seem correct. At this point next == lstart which is a file
> offset passed to the routine as opposed to an index.
>
> I would think next needs to be set to 'lstart >> PAGE_SHIFT' here.
>
>>> for (i = 0; i < folio_batch_count(&fbatch); ++i) {
>>> struct folio *folio = fbatch.folios[i];
>>> u32 hash = 0;
>>> - index = folio->index;
>>> + index = (folio->index) >> huge_page_shift(h);
>
> Here you want to convert index from the PAGE_SIZE index to a hugetlb
> page size index. Correct?
> I am terrible at arithmetic, but huge_page_shift already includes
> PAGE_SHIFT, so it seems like you want this to me.
>
> index = (folio->index) >> huge_page_order(h);
>
>>> hash = hugetlb_fault_mutex_hash(mapping, index);
>>> mutex_lock(&hugetlb_fault_mutex_table[hash]);
>>> @@ -693,10 +692,11 @@ static void hugetlbfs_zero_partial_page(struct hstate *h,
>>> loff_t start,
>>> loff_t end)
>>> {
>>> - pgoff_t idx = start >> huge_page_shift(h);
>>> + struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
>>> + struct vm_area_struct *vma = find_vma(mm, start);
>>> struct folio *folio;
>>> - folio = filemap_lock_folio(mapping, idx);
>>> + folio = filemap_lock_hugetlb_folio(vma, start);
>
> Here you are passing an address/index that may be associated with a
> tail page. I assume since the hugetlb folio is multi-order, the
> returned folio will be for the 'head page'. Correct?
>
>>> if (IS_ERR(folio))
>>> return;
>>> @@ -868,7 +868,7 @@ static long hugetlbfs_fallocate(struct file *file, int mode, loff_t offset,
>>> }
>>> clear_huge_page(&folio->page, addr, pages_per_huge_page(h));
>>> __folio_mark_uptodate(folio);
>>> - error = hugetlb_add_to_page_cache(folio, mapping, index);
>>> + error = hugetlb_add_to_page_cache(folio, &pseudo_vma, mapping, addr);
>>> if (unlikely(error)) {
>>> restore_reserve_on_error(h, &pseudo_vma, addr, folio);
>>> folio_put(folio);
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/hugetlb.h b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
>>> index 21f942025fecd..55f90e051b7a2 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/hugetlb.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/hugetlb.h
>>> @@ -727,8 +727,8 @@ struct folio *alloc_hugetlb_folio_nodemask(struct hstate *h, int preferred_nid,
>>> nodemask_t *nmask, gfp_t gfp_mask);
>>> struct folio *alloc_hugetlb_folio_vma(struct hstate *h, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>> unsigned long address);
>>> -int hugetlb_add_to_page_cache(struct folio *folio, struct address_space *mapping,
>>> - pgoff_t idx);
>>> +int hugetlb_add_to_page_cache(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>> + struct address_space *mapping, unsigned long address);
>>> void restore_reserve_on_error(struct hstate *h, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>> unsigned long address, struct folio *folio);
>>> @@ -755,6 +755,16 @@ static inline struct hugepage_subpool *hugetlb_folio_subpool(struct folio *folio
>>> return folio->_hugetlb_subpool;
>>> }
>>> +/* Wrapper function for __filemap_get_folio*/
>>> +static inline struct folio *filemap_lock_hugetlb_folio(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>> + unsigned long address)
>>> +{
>>> + struct address_space *mapping = vma->vm_file->f_mapping;
>>> +
>>> + pgoff_t idx = linear_page_index(vma, address);
>>> + return __filemap_get_folio(mapping, idx, FGP_LOCK, 0);
>>> +}
>
> I like the wrapper idea. This is going to replace existing calls to
> filemap_lock_folio. What about something like this for the routine:
>
> static inline struct folio *filemap_lock_hugetlb_folio(struct hstate *h,
> struct address_space *mapping,
> pgoff_t index);
> {
> /* please verify my arithmetic */
> return filemap_lock_folio(mapping, index << huge_page_order(h));
> }
>
> In this way, existing callers would only need to be changed to pass in
> hstate. Perhaps, there was a reason for your wrapper not obvious to me?
>
>>> +
>>> static inline void hugetlb_set_folio_subpool(struct folio *folio,
>>> struct hugepage_subpool *subpool)
>>> {
>>> @@ -1021,6 +1031,13 @@ static inline struct hugepage_subpool *hugetlb_folio_subpool(struct folio *folio
>>> return NULL;
>>> }
>>> +/* Wrapper function for __filemap_get_folio*/
>>> +static inline struct folio *filemap_lock_hugetlb_folio(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>> + unsigned long address)
>>> +{
>>> + return NULL;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> static inline int isolate_or_dissolve_huge_page(struct page *page,
>>> struct list_head *list)
>>> {
>>> diff --git a/include/linux/pagemap.h b/include/linux/pagemap.h
>>> index 17c414fc2136e..ae8f36966d7b3 100644
>>> --- a/include/linux/pagemap.h
>>> +++ b/include/linux/pagemap.h
>>> @@ -860,8 +860,6 @@ static inline pgoff_t linear_page_index(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>> unsigned long address)
>>> {
>>> pgoff_t pgoff;
>>> - if (unlikely(is_vm_hugetlb_page(vma)))
>>> - return linear_hugepage_index(vma, address);
>>> pgoff = (address - vma->vm_start) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
>>> pgoff += vma->vm_pgoff;
>>> return pgoff;
>>> diff --git a/mm/hugetlb.c b/mm/hugetlb.c
>>> index dfa412d8cb300..824d6d215a161 100644
>>> --- a/mm/hugetlb.c
>>> +++ b/mm/hugetlb.c
>>> @@ -951,7 +951,7 @@ static long region_count(struct resv_map *resv, long f, long t)
>>> /*
>>> * Convert the address within this vma to the page offset within
>>> - * the mapping, in pagecache page units; huge pages here.
>>> + * the mapping, in huge page units here.
>>> */
>>> static pgoff_t vma_hugecache_offset(struct hstate *h,
>>> struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address)
>>> @@ -5730,7 +5730,7 @@ static bool hugetlbfs_pagecache_present(struct hstate *h,
>>> struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address)
>>> {
>>> struct address_space *mapping = vma->vm_file->f_mapping;
>>> - pgoff_t idx = vma_hugecache_offset(h, vma, address);
>>> + pgoff_t idx = linear_page_index(vma, address);
>>> bool present;
>>> rcu_read_lock();
>>> @@ -5740,13 +5740,16 @@ static bool hugetlbfs_pagecache_present(struct hstate *h,
>>> return present;
>>> }
>>> -int hugetlb_add_to_page_cache(struct folio *folio, struct address_space *mapping,
>>> - pgoff_t idx)
>>> +int hugetlb_add_to_page_cache(struct folio *folio,
>>> + struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>>> + struct address_space *mapping,
>>> + unsigned long address)
>>> {
>
> Like filemap_lock_hugetlb_folio(), can you just add hstate to existing
> hugetlb_add_to_page_cache() arguments and do arithmetic to convert index
> to PAGE_SIZE based index?
>

I wanted to avoid using "magic numbers" through doing arithmetic shifts
to convert the index and instead explicitly use the linear_page_index()
helper function. However this does add more complexity as the function
parameters are changed. I can change it to doing the arithmetic shift to
minimize code changes for v2.

Thanks,
Sidhartha Kumar

> Again, I could be missing something. But, IMO such a conversion would
> minimize changes to the current code.


2023-06-17 00:36:05

by Mike Kravetz

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mm/hugetlb: add wrapper functions for interactions with page cache

On 06/16/23 11:52, Sidhartha Kumar wrote:
> On 6/15/23 4:36 PM, Mike Kravetz wrote:
> > On 06/09/23 12:52, Sidhartha Kumar wrote:
> > > On 6/9/23 12:49 PM, Sidhartha Kumar wrote:
> > > > Signed-off-by: Sidhartha Kumar <[email protected]>
> >
> > Like filemap_lock_hugetlb_folio(), can you just add hstate to existing
> > hugetlb_add_to_page_cache() arguments and do arithmetic to convert index
> > to PAGE_SIZE based index?
> >
>
> I wanted to avoid using "magic numbers" through doing arithmetic shifts to
> convert the index and instead explicitly use the linear_page_index() helper
> function. However this does add more complexity as the function parameters
> are changed. I can change it to doing the arithmetic shift to minimize code
> changes for v2.
>

I would prefer the arithmetic shifts. The only magic is that it assumes the
page cache is managed in PAGE_SIZE units. My guess is more code this this
would break if that was changed.

Matthew may have a more forward thinking opinion.
--
Mike Kravetz