2023-07-14 01:18:43

by Ilkka Koskinen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v5 0/4] perf: ampere: Add support for Ampere SoC PMUs

Changes since v4:
* "Support implementation specific filters" patch:
- Added comment about filter and impdef registers and reference
to the Coresight PMU specification to the commit message

* "Add support for Ampere SoC PMU" patch:
- Fixed the documentation and added more comments
- Changed the incrementing PMU index number to idr_alloc()
(Needs a impdef release hook patch to release unused index)
- Fixed style in init_ops() to more reasonable
- Moved bank parameter to config1

Changes since v3:
* use_64b_counter_reg => has_atomic_dword (patch 1/4)
* Removed the unnecessary hook for group validation (patch 3/4)
* Added group config validation to ampere_cspmu_validate_event() (patch 4/4)
* Rebased the patchset

Changes since v2:
* Changed to use supports_64bits_atomics() and replaced the split writes
with lo_hi_writeq()
* Added implementation specific group validation to patch 3
* Dropped shared interrupt patch
* Removed unnecessary filter_enable parameter from ampere module
* Added group validation to ampere module

Changes since v1:
* Rather than creating a completely new driver, implemented as a submodule
of Arm CoreSight PMU driver
* Fixed shared filter handling


Ilkka Koskinen (4):
perf: arm_cspmu: Split 64-bit write to 32-bit writes
perf: arm_cspmu: Support implementation specific filters
perf: arm_cspmu: Support implementation specific validation
perf: arm_cspmu: ampere_cspmu: Add support for Ampere SoC PMU

.../admin-guide/perf/ampere_cspmu.rst | 29 +++
drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/Makefile | 2 +-
drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/ampere_cspmu.c | 243 ++++++++++++++++++
drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/ampere_cspmu.h | 17 ++
drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c | 29 ++-
drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h | 6 +
6 files changed, 321 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 Documentation/admin-guide/perf/ampere_cspmu.rst
create mode 100644 drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/ampere_cspmu.c
create mode 100644 drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/ampere_cspmu.h

--
2.40.1



2023-07-14 01:31:26

by Ilkka Koskinen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v5 3/4] perf: arm_cspmu: Support implementation specific validation

Some platforms may use e.g. different filtering mechanism and, thus,
may need different way to validate the events and group.

Signed-off-by: Ilkka Koskinen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]>
---
drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c | 8 +++++++-
drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h | 3 +++
2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
index fafd734c3218..471d6d7ac81a 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
@@ -553,7 +553,7 @@ static void arm_cspmu_disable(struct pmu *pmu)
static int arm_cspmu_get_event_idx(struct arm_cspmu_hw_events *hw_events,
struct perf_event *event)
{
- int idx;
+ int idx, ret;
struct arm_cspmu *cspmu = to_arm_cspmu(event->pmu);

if (supports_cycle_counter(cspmu)) {
@@ -587,6 +587,12 @@ static int arm_cspmu_get_event_idx(struct arm_cspmu_hw_events *hw_events,
if (idx >= cspmu->num_logical_ctrs)
return -EAGAIN;

+ if (cspmu->impl.ops.validate_event) {
+ ret = cspmu->impl.ops.validate_event(cspmu, event);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ }
+
set_bit(idx, hw_events->used_ctrs);

return idx;
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h
index d6d88c246a23..5070d34c2285 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h
@@ -104,6 +104,9 @@ struct arm_cspmu_impl_ops {
/* Set event filter */
void (*set_ev_filter)(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu,
struct hw_perf_event *hwc, u32 filter);
+ /* Implementation specific event validation */
+ int (*validate_event)(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu,
+ struct perf_event *event);
/* Hide/show unsupported events */
umode_t (*event_attr_is_visible)(struct kobject *kobj,
struct attribute *attr, int unused);
--
2.40.1


2023-07-14 01:37:08

by Ilkka Koskinen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v5 2/4] perf: arm_cspmu: Support implementation specific filters

ARM Coresight PMU architecture specification [1] defines PMEVTYPER and
PMEVFILT* registers as optional in Chapter 2.1. Moreover, implementers may
choose to use PMIMPDEF* registers (offset: 0xD80-> 0xDFF) to filter the
events. Add support for those by adding implementation specific filter
callback function.

[1] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/ihi0091/latest

Signed-off-by: Ilkka Koskinen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Besar Wicaksono <[email protected]>
---
drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c | 8 ++++++--
drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h | 3 +++
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
index 0f517152cb4e..fafd734c3218 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
@@ -117,6 +117,9 @@

static unsigned long arm_cspmu_cpuhp_state;

+static void arm_cspmu_set_ev_filter(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu,
+ struct hw_perf_event *hwc, u32 filter);
+
static struct acpi_apmt_node *arm_cspmu_apmt_node(struct device *dev)
{
return *(struct acpi_apmt_node **)dev_get_platdata(dev);
@@ -426,6 +429,7 @@ static int arm_cspmu_init_impl_ops(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu)
CHECK_DEFAULT_IMPL_OPS(impl_ops, event_type);
CHECK_DEFAULT_IMPL_OPS(impl_ops, event_filter);
CHECK_DEFAULT_IMPL_OPS(impl_ops, event_attr_is_visible);
+ CHECK_DEFAULT_IMPL_OPS(impl_ops, set_ev_filter);

return 0;
}
@@ -792,7 +796,7 @@ static inline void arm_cspmu_set_event(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu,
writel(hwc->config, cspmu->base0 + offset);
}

-static inline void arm_cspmu_set_ev_filter(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu,
+static void arm_cspmu_set_ev_filter(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu,
struct hw_perf_event *hwc,
u32 filter)
{
@@ -826,7 +830,7 @@ static void arm_cspmu_start(struct perf_event *event, int pmu_flags)
arm_cspmu_set_cc_filter(cspmu, filter);
} else {
arm_cspmu_set_event(cspmu, hwc);
- arm_cspmu_set_ev_filter(cspmu, hwc, filter);
+ cspmu->impl.ops.set_ev_filter(cspmu, hwc, filter);
}

hwc->state = 0;
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h
index 83df53d1c132..d6d88c246a23 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.h
@@ -101,6 +101,9 @@ struct arm_cspmu_impl_ops {
u32 (*event_type)(const struct perf_event *event);
/* Decode filter value from configs */
u32 (*event_filter)(const struct perf_event *event);
+ /* Set event filter */
+ void (*set_ev_filter)(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu,
+ struct hw_perf_event *hwc, u32 filter);
/* Hide/show unsupported events */
umode_t (*event_attr_is_visible)(struct kobject *kobj,
struct attribute *attr, int unused);
--
2.40.1


2023-07-14 01:38:29

by Ilkka Koskinen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v5 4/4] perf: arm_cspmu: ampere_cspmu: Add support for Ampere SoC PMU

Ampere SoC PMU follows CoreSight PMU architecture. It uses implementation
specific registers to filter events rather than PMEVFILTnR registers.

Signed-off-by: Ilkka Koskinen <[email protected]>
---
.../admin-guide/perf/ampere_cspmu.rst | 29 +++
drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/Makefile | 2 +-
drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/ampere_cspmu.c | 243 ++++++++++++++++++
drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/ampere_cspmu.h | 17 ++
drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c | 8 +
5 files changed, 298 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
create mode 100644 Documentation/admin-guide/perf/ampere_cspmu.rst
create mode 100644 drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/ampere_cspmu.c
create mode 100644 drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/ampere_cspmu.h

diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/perf/ampere_cspmu.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/perf/ampere_cspmu.rst
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..94f93f5aee6c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/perf/ampere_cspmu.rst
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+.. SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+
+============================================
+Ampere SoC Performance Monitoring Unit (PMU)
+============================================
+
+Ampere SoC PMU is a generic PMU IP that follows Arm CoreSight PMU architecture.
+Therefore, the driver is implemented as a submodule of arm_cspmu driver. At the
+first phase it's used for counting MCU events on AmpereOne.
+
+
+MCU PMU events
+--------------
+
+The PMU driver supports setting filters for "rank", "bank", and "threshold".
+Note, that the filters are per PMU instance rather than per event.
+
+
+Example for perf tool use::
+
+ / # perf list ampere
+
+ ampere_mcu_pmu_0/act_sent/ [Kernel PMU event]
+ <...>
+ ampere_mcu_pmu_1/rd_sent/ [Kernel PMU event]
+ <...>
+
+ / # perf stat -a -e ampere_mcu_pmu_0/act_sent,bank=5,rank=3,threshold=2/,ampere_mcu_pmu_1/rd_sent/ \
+ sleep 1
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/Makefile b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/Makefile
index fedb17df982d..b80a8bd8da54 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/Makefile
@@ -3,4 +3,4 @@
# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0

obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_CORESIGHT_PMU_ARCH_SYSTEM_PMU) += arm_cspmu_module.o
-arm_cspmu_module-y := arm_cspmu.o nvidia_cspmu.o
+arm_cspmu_module-y := arm_cspmu.o nvidia_cspmu.o ampere_cspmu.o
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/ampere_cspmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/ampere_cspmu.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..cfafc093b694
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/ampere_cspmu.c
@@ -0,0 +1,243 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Ampere SoC PMU (Performance Monitor Unit)
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2023, Ampere Computing LLC
+ */
+
+#include "ampere_cspmu.h"
+
+#define PMAUXR0 0xD80
+#define PMAUXR1 0xD84
+#define PMAUXR2 0xD88
+#define PMAUXR3 0xD8C
+
+#define to_ampere_cspmu_ctx(cspmu) ((struct ampere_cspmu_ctx *)(cspmu->impl.ctx))
+
+struct ampere_cspmu_ctx {
+ const char *name;
+ struct attribute **event_attr;
+ struct attribute **format_attr;
+};
+
+static DEFINE_IDR(mcu_pmu_idr);
+
+#define SOC_PMU_EVENT_ATTR_EXTRACTOR(_name, _config, _start, _end) \
+ static inline u32 get_##_name(const struct perf_event *event) \
+ { \
+ return FIELD_GET(GENMASK_ULL(_end, _start), \
+ event->attr._config); \
+ } \
+
+SOC_PMU_EVENT_ATTR_EXTRACTOR(event, config, 0, 8);
+SOC_PMU_EVENT_ATTR_EXTRACTOR(threshold, config1, 0, 7);
+SOC_PMU_EVENT_ATTR_EXTRACTOR(rank, config1, 8, 23);
+SOC_PMU_EVENT_ATTR_EXTRACTOR(bank, config1, 24, 55);
+
+static struct attribute *ampereone_mcu_pmu_event_attrs[] = {
+ ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(cycle_count, 0x00),
+ ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(act_sent, 0x01),
+ ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(pre_sent, 0x02),
+ ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(rd_sent, 0x03),
+ ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(rda_sent, 0x04),
+ ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(wr_sent, 0x05),
+ ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(wra_sent, 0x06),
+ ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(pd_entry_vld, 0x07),
+ ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(sref_entry_vld, 0x08),
+ ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(prea_sent, 0x09),
+ ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(pre_sb_sent, 0x0a),
+ ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(ref_sent, 0x0b),
+ ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(rfm_sent, 0x0c),
+ ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(ref_sb_sent, 0x0d),
+ ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(rfm_sb_sent, 0x0e),
+ ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(rd_rda_sent, 0x0f),
+ ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(wr_wra_sent, 0x10),
+ ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(raw_hazard, 0x11),
+ ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(war_hazard, 0x12),
+ ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(waw_hazard, 0x13),
+ ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(rar_hazard, 0x14),
+ ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(raw_war_waw_hazard, 0x15),
+ ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(hprd_lprd_wr_req_vld, 0x16),
+ ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(lprd_req_vld, 0x17),
+ ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(hprd_req_vld, 0x18),
+ ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(hprd_lprd_req_vld, 0x19),
+ ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(prefetch_tgt, 0x1a),
+ ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(wr_req_vld, 0x1b),
+ ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(partial_wr_req_vld, 0x1c),
+ ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(rd_retry, 0x1d),
+ ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(wr_retry, 0x1e),
+ ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(retry_gnt, 0x1f),
+ ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(rank_change, 0x20),
+ ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(dir_change, 0x21),
+ ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(rank_dir_change, 0x22),
+ ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(rank_active, 0x23),
+ ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(rank_idle, 0x24),
+ ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(rank_pd, 0x25),
+ ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(rank_sref, 0x26),
+ ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(queue_fill_gt_thresh, 0x27),
+ ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(queue_rds_gt_thresh, 0x28),
+ ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(queue_wrs_gt_thresh, 0x29),
+ ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(phy_updt_complt, 0x2a),
+ ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(tz_fail, 0x2b),
+ ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(dram_errc, 0x2c),
+ ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(dram_errd, 0x2d),
+ ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(read_data_return, 0x32),
+ ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(chi_wr_data_delta, 0x33),
+ ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(zq_start, 0x34),
+ ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(zq_latch, 0x35),
+ ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(wr_fifo_full, 0x36),
+ ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(info_fifo_full, 0x37),
+ ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(cmd_fifo_full, 0x38),
+ ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(dfi_nop, 0x39),
+ ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(dfi_cmd, 0x3a),
+ ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(rd_run_len, 0x3b),
+ ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(wr_run_len, 0x3c),
+
+ ARM_CSPMU_EVENT_ATTR(cycles, ARM_CSPMU_EVT_CYCLES_DEFAULT),
+ NULL,
+};
+
+static struct attribute *ampereone_mcu_format_attrs[] = {
+ ARM_CSPMU_FORMAT_EVENT_ATTR,
+ ARM_CSPMU_FORMAT_ATTR(threshold, "config1:0-7"),
+ ARM_CSPMU_FORMAT_ATTR(rank, "config1:8-23"),
+ ARM_CSPMU_FORMAT_ATTR(bank, "config1:24-55"),
+ NULL,
+};
+
+static struct attribute **
+ampere_cspmu_get_event_attrs(const struct arm_cspmu *cspmu)
+{
+ const struct ampere_cspmu_ctx *ctx = to_ampere_cspmu_ctx(cspmu);
+
+ return ctx->event_attr;
+}
+
+static struct attribute **
+ampere_cspmu_get_format_attrs(const struct arm_cspmu *cspmu)
+{
+ const struct ampere_cspmu_ctx *ctx = to_ampere_cspmu_ctx(cspmu);
+
+ return ctx->format_attr;
+}
+
+static const char *
+ampere_cspmu_get_name(const struct arm_cspmu *cspmu)
+{
+ const struct ampere_cspmu_ctx *ctx = to_ampere_cspmu_ctx(cspmu);
+
+ return ctx->name;
+}
+
+static u32 ampere_cspmu_event_filter(const struct perf_event *event)
+{
+ /*
+ * PMEVFILTR or PMCCFILTR aren't used in Ampere SoC PMU but are marked
+ * as RES0. Make sure, PMCCFILTR is written zero.
+ */
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void ampere_cspmu_set_ev_filter(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu,
+ struct hw_perf_event *hwc,
+ u32 filter)
+{
+ struct perf_event *event;
+ unsigned int idx;
+ u32 threshold, rank, bank;
+
+ /*
+ * At this point, all the events have the same filter settings.
+ * Therefore, take the first event and use its configuration.
+ */
+ idx = find_first_bit(cspmu->hw_events.used_ctrs,
+ cspmu->cycle_counter_logical_idx);
+
+ event = cspmu->hw_events.events[idx];
+
+ threshold = get_threshold(event);
+ rank = get_rank(event);
+ bank = get_bank(event);
+
+ writel(threshold, cspmu->base0 + PMAUXR0);
+ writel(rank, cspmu->base0 + PMAUXR1);
+ writel(bank, cspmu->base0 + PMAUXR2);
+}
+
+static int ampere_cspmu_validate_configs(struct perf_event *event,
+ struct perf_event *event2)
+{
+ if (get_threshold(event) != get_threshold(event2) ||
+ get_rank(event) != get_rank(event2) ||
+ get_bank(event) != get_bank(event2))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int ampere_cspmu_validate_event(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu,
+ struct perf_event *new)
+{
+ struct perf_event *curr, *leader = new->group_leader;
+ unsigned int idx;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = ampere_cspmu_validate_configs(new, leader);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ /* We compare the global filter settings to the existing events */
+ idx = find_first_bit(cspmu->hw_events.used_ctrs,
+ cspmu->cycle_counter_logical_idx);
+
+ /* This is the first event, thus any configuration is fine */
+ if (idx == cspmu->cycle_counter_logical_idx)
+ return 0;
+
+ curr = cspmu->hw_events.events[idx];
+
+ return ampere_cspmu_validate_configs(curr, new);
+}
+
+static char *ampere_cspmu_format_name(const struct arm_cspmu *cspmu,
+ const char *name_pattern)
+{
+ struct device *dev = cspmu->dev;
+ int id;
+
+ id = idr_alloc(&mcu_pmu_idr, NULL, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (id < 0)
+ return ERR_PTR(id);
+
+ return devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, name_pattern, id);
+}
+
+int ampere_cspmu_init_ops(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu)
+{
+ struct device *dev = cspmu->dev;
+ struct ampere_cspmu_ctx *ctx;
+ struct arm_cspmu_impl_ops *impl_ops = &cspmu->impl.ops;
+
+ ctx = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(struct ampere_cspmu_ctx), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!ctx)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ ctx->event_attr = ampereone_mcu_pmu_event_attrs;
+ ctx->format_attr = ampereone_mcu_format_attrs;
+ ctx->name = ampere_cspmu_format_name(cspmu, "ampere_mcu_pmu_%d");
+ if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(ctx->name))
+ return ctx->name ? PTR_ERR(ctx->name) : -ENOMEM;
+
+ cspmu->impl.ctx = ctx;
+
+ impl_ops->event_filter = ampere_cspmu_event_filter;
+ impl_ops->set_ev_filter = ampere_cspmu_set_ev_filter;
+ impl_ops->validate_event = ampere_cspmu_validate_event;
+ impl_ops->get_name = ampere_cspmu_get_name;
+ impl_ops->get_event_attrs = ampere_cspmu_get_event_attrs;
+ impl_ops->get_format_attrs = ampere_cspmu_get_format_attrs;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/ampere_cspmu.h b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/ampere_cspmu.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..9b3e1628d1d6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/ampere_cspmu.h
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+
+/*
+ * Ampere SoC PMU (Performance Monitor Unit)
+ *
+ * Copyright (c) 2023, Ampere Computing LLC
+ */
+
+#ifndef __AMPERE_CSPMU_H__
+#define __AMPERE_CSPMU_H__
+
+#include "arm_cspmu.h"
+
+/* Allocate AMPERE descriptor. */
+int ampere_cspmu_init_ops(struct arm_cspmu *cspmu);
+
+#endif /* __AMPERE_CSPMU_H__ */
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
index 471d6d7ac81a..579f2697b419 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
@@ -30,6 +30,8 @@
#include <linux/platform_device.h>

#include "arm_cspmu.h"
+
+#include "ampere_cspmu.h"
#include "nvidia_cspmu.h"

#define PMUNAME "arm_cspmu"
@@ -114,6 +116,7 @@

/* JEDEC-assigned JEP106 identification code */
#define ARM_CSPMU_IMPL_ID_NVIDIA 0x36B
+#define ARM_CSPMU_IMPL_ID_AMPERE 0xA16

static unsigned long arm_cspmu_cpuhp_state;

@@ -388,6 +391,11 @@ static const struct impl_match impl_match[] = {
.mask = ARM_CSPMU_PMIIDR_IMPLEMENTER,
.impl_init_ops = nv_cspmu_init_ops
},
+ {
+ .pmiidr = ARM_CSPMU_IMPL_ID_AMPERE,
+ .mask = ARM_CSPMU_PMIIDR_IMPLEMENTER,
+ .impl_init_ops = ampere_cspmu_init_ops
+ },
{}
};

--
2.40.1


2023-07-14 01:38:54

by Ilkka Koskinen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v5 1/4] perf: arm_cspmu: Split 64-bit write to 32-bit writes

Split the 64-bit register accesses if 64-bit access is not supported
by the PMU.

Signed-off-by: Ilkka Koskinen <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Besar Wicaksono <[email protected]>
---
drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
index e2b7827c4563..0f517152cb4e 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_cspmu/arm_cspmu.c
@@ -696,7 +696,10 @@ static void arm_cspmu_write_counter(struct perf_event *event, u64 val)
if (use_64b_counter_reg(cspmu)) {
offset = counter_offset(sizeof(u64), event->hw.idx);

- writeq(val, cspmu->base1 + offset);
+ if (cspmu->has_atomic_dword)
+ writeq(val, cspmu->base1 + offset);
+ else
+ lo_hi_writeq(val, cspmu->base1 + offset);
} else {
offset = counter_offset(sizeof(u32), event->hw.idx);

--
2.40.1


2023-07-28 15:35:19

by Will Deacon

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] perf: ampere: Add support for Ampere SoC PMUs

On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 06:01:37PM -0700, Ilkka Koskinen wrote:
> Changes since v4:
> * "Support implementation specific filters" patch:
> - Added comment about filter and impdef registers and reference
> to the Coresight PMU specification to the commit message
>
> * "Add support for Ampere SoC PMU" patch:
> - Fixed the documentation and added more comments
> - Changed the incrementing PMU index number to idr_alloc()
> (Needs a impdef release hook patch to release unused index)
> - Fixed style in init_ops() to more reasonable
> - Moved bank parameter to config1

This looks pretty good to me, but I think we should merge the series
reworking the backend registration first:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/

and then this should slot in quite nicely. I've left a minor comment over
there and I'd like Suzuki's review, but then we're good to go.

Cheers,

Will

2023-07-31 07:21:51

by Ilkka Koskinen

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/4] perf: ampere: Add support for Ampere SoC PMUs


Hi Will,

On Fri, 28 Jul 2023, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 13, 2023 at 06:01:37PM -0700, Ilkka Koskinen wrote:
>> Changes since v4:
>> * "Support implementation specific filters" patch:
>> - Added comment about filter and impdef registers and reference
>> to the Coresight PMU specification to the commit message
>>
>> * "Add support for Ampere SoC PMU" patch:
>> - Fixed the documentation and added more comments
>> - Changed the incrementing PMU index number to idr_alloc()
>> (Needs a impdef release hook patch to release unused index)
>> - Fixed style in init_ops() to more reasonable
>> - Moved bank parameter to config1
>
> This looks pretty good to me, but I think we should merge the series
> reworking the backend registration first:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/[email protected]/
>
> and then this should slot in quite nicely. I've left a minor comment over
> there and I'd like Suzuki's review, but then we're good to go.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Will

Sounds good to me. I'll try to find some time to do the needed changes to
my patches and rebase them on top of Besar's patchset.

Cheers, Ilkka