Add microchip,sam9x7-pmecc to DT bindings documentation.
Signed-off-by: Varshini Rajendran <[email protected]>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/atmel-nand.txt | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/atmel-nand.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/atmel-nand.txt
index 50645828ac20..4598930851d9 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/atmel-nand.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/atmel-nand.txt
@@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ Required properties:
"atmel,sama5d4-pmecc"
"atmel,sama5d2-pmecc"
"microchip,sam9x60-pmecc"
+ "microchip,sam9x7-pmecc", "atmel,at91sam9g45-pmecc"
- reg: should contain 2 register ranges. The first one is pointing to the PMECC
block, and the second one to the PMECC_ERRLOC block.
--
2.25.1
On 7/28/23 11:26, Varshini Rajendran wrote:
> Add microchip,sam9x7-pmecc to DT bindings documentation.
>
Why? What's the underlying problem that motivated you do this patch?
> Signed-off-by: Varshini Rajendran <[email protected]>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/atmel-nand.txt | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/atmel-nand.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/atmel-nand.txt
> index 50645828ac20..4598930851d9 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/atmel-nand.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/atmel-nand.txt
> @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ Required properties:
> "atmel,sama5d4-pmecc"
> "atmel,sama5d2-pmecc"
> "microchip,sam9x60-pmecc"
> + "microchip,sam9x7-pmecc", "atmel,at91sam9g45-pmecc"
> - reg: should contain 2 register ranges. The first one is pointing to the PMECC
> block, and the second one to the PMECC_ERRLOC block.
>
On 28/07/2023 13:06, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
>
>
> On 7/28/23 11:26, Varshini Rajendran wrote:
>> Add microchip,sam9x7-pmecc to DT bindings documentation.
>>
>
> Why? What's the underlying problem that motivated you do this patch?
Isn't the problem already described in commit msg, although shortly:
There is a new SoC sam9x7, where the model name is sam9x7 and it is not
a wild-card nor family name of SoCs, and we add compatible for it, as
expected by writing-bindings guideline.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
On 28/07/23 4:36 pm, Tudor Ambarus wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>
> On 7/28/23 11:26, Varshini Rajendran wrote:
>> Add microchip,sam9x7-pmecc to DT bindings documentation.
>>
>
> Why? What's the underlying problem that motivated you do this patch?
Hi Tudor,
The motivation is to have compatibles specific to the SoC. I am aware
that there is no change in the IP nor the driver. As Krzysztof mentioned
in another patch, this is just to add a SoC specific compatible string.
Hope this clears the query.
>
>> Signed-off-by: Varshini Rajendran <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/atmel-nand.txt | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/atmel-nand.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/atmel-nand.txt
>> index 50645828ac20..4598930851d9 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/atmel-nand.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/atmel-nand.txt
>> @@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ Required properties:
>> "atmel,sama5d4-pmecc"
>> "atmel,sama5d2-pmecc"
>> "microchip,sam9x60-pmecc"
>> + "microchip,sam9x7-pmecc", "atmel,at91sam9g45-pmecc"
>> - reg: should contain 2 register ranges. The first one is pointing to the PMECC
>> block, and the second one to the PMECC_ERRLOC block.
>>
--
Thanks and Regards,
Varshini Rajendran.