Correct the use of define DSA_TAG_PROTO_LAN937X_VALUE to
DSA_TAG_PROTO_LAN937X to improve readability.
Fixes: 99b16df0cd52 ("net: dsa: microchip: lan937x: add dsa_tag_protocol")
Signed-off-by: Sean Nyekjaer <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c b/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c
index 286e20f340e5..5c2214784ed0 100644
--- a/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c
+++ b/drivers/net/dsa/microchip/ksz_common.c
@@ -2614,7 +2614,7 @@ static enum dsa_tag_protocol ksz_get_tag_protocol(struct dsa_switch *ds,
proto = DSA_TAG_PROTO_KSZ9477;
if (is_lan937x(dev))
- proto = DSA_TAG_PROTO_LAN937X_VALUE;
+ proto = DSA_TAG_PROTO_LAN937X;
return proto;
}
--
2.42.0
Hi Sean,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sean Nyekjaer <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2023 12:55 PM
> To: Woojung Huh - C21699 <[email protected]>;
> UNGLinuxDriver <[email protected]>; Andrew Lunn
> <[email protected]>; Florian Fainelli <[email protected]>; Vladimir Oltean
> <[email protected]>; David S. Miller <[email protected]>; Eric
> Dumazet <[email protected]>; Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>;
> Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>; Arun Ramadoss - I17769
> <[email protected]>
> Cc: Sean Nyekjaer <[email protected]>; [email protected]; linux-
> [email protected]
> Subject: [PATCH net] net: dsa: microchip: use DSA_TAG_PROTO without
> _VALUE define
>
> [Some people who received this message don't often get email from
> [email protected]. Learn why this is important at
> https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
>
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the
> content is safe
>
> Correct the use of define DSA_TAG_PROTO_LAN937X_VALUE to
> DSA_TAG_PROTO_LAN937X to improve readability.
>
> Fixes: 99b16df0cd52 ("net: dsa: microchip: lan937x: add dsa_tag_protocol")
> Signed-off-by: Sean Nyekjaer <[email protected]>
Not sure, whether it is a bug fix or not. Since it only improves readability.
I believe it should point to net-next.
Hi Arun,
> On 6 Dec 2023, at 09.58, <[email protected]> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Sean,
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Sean Nyekjaer <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 6, 2023 12:55 PM
>> To: Woojung Huh - C21699 <[email protected]>;
>> UNGLinuxDriver <[email protected]>; Andrew Lunn
>> <[email protected]>; Florian Fainelli <[email protected]>; Vladimir Oltean
>> <[email protected]>; David S. Miller <[email protected]>; Eric
>> Dumazet <[email protected]>; Jakub Kicinski <[email protected]>;
>> Paolo Abeni <[email protected]>; Arun Ramadoss - I17769
>> <[email protected]>
>> Cc: Sean Nyekjaer <[email protected]>; [email protected]; linux-
>> [email protected]
>> Subject: [PATCH net] net: dsa: microchip: use DSA_TAG_PROTO without
>> _VALUE define
>>
>> [Some people who received this message don't often get email from
>> [email protected]. Learn why this is important at
>> https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
>>
>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the
>> content is safe
>>
>> Correct the use of define DSA_TAG_PROTO_LAN937X_VALUE to
>> DSA_TAG_PROTO_LAN937X to improve readability.
>>
>> Fixes: 99b16df0cd52 ("net: dsa: microchip: lan937x: add dsa_tag_protocol")
>> Signed-off-by: Sean Nyekjaer <[email protected]>
>
> Not sure, whether it is a bug fix or not. Since it only improves readability.
> I believe it should point to net-next.
>
Agree :)
Feel free to remove the Fixes tag while applying.
/Sean
On Wed, Dec 06, 2023 at 10:00:52AM +0100, Sean Nyekjaer wrote:
> Hi Arun,
>
> > On 6 Dec 2023, at 09.58, <[email protected]> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Sean,
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> Correct the use of define DSA_TAG_PROTO_LAN937X_VALUE to
> >> DSA_TAG_PROTO_LAN937X to improve readability.
> >>
> >> Fixes: 99b16df0cd52 ("net: dsa: microchip: lan937x: add dsa_tag_protocol")
> >> Signed-off-by: Sean Nyekjaer <[email protected]>
> >
> > Not sure, whether it is a bug fix or not. Since it only improves readability.
> > I believe it should point to net-next.
> >
>
> Agree :)
>
> Feel free to remove the Fixes tag while applying.
>
> /Sean
If you're talking to Arun: he can't do that. Only Jakub, David, Paolo
and Eric can apply patches, and based on history, I don't think that
either of them is keen on editing patches before applying. One way or
another, based on past experience, you might be better off just resending,
with the Fixes tag dropped, and patch retargeted to net-next (and
counter incremented to v2).
The criteria from Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst still
apply pretty much to net.git as well, since these patches land in stable
trees too. We triage as much as possible, to give users of stable
kernels a worthwhile reason to update, not a change that results in
absolutely the same generated machine code.